Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bryan Lynch Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$137k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$319kCommunity Improvement$119kRecreation & Sports$101kAnimals$92kReligion$56kArts & Culture$43kHealth$11kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$12,200
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION$65,000
KANSAS ATHLETICS$17,000
BISHOP SEABURY ACADEMY$14,000
ST LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION$12,200
SAINT PETER'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$12,000
FOREST PARK FOREVER$10,000
DOUGLAS COUNTY CASA$5,000
MOUNT VERNON CEMETARY ASSOCIATION$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PROMISE COMMUNITY HOMES: $5k → 11%RAINBOW VILLAGE: $807 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Bryan Lynch Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Bryan Lynch Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$720k · 15 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
13

Total granted

$720k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-10%

Still filing today

40%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FP
    Forest Park Forever Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $84k · revenue +213%
  • BS
    BISHOP SEABURY ACADEMY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $79k · revenue +18%
  • NW
    NATIONAL WWI MUSEUM AND MEMORIAL
    4× · 2017–2021 · $6k · revenue +227%

Funded once

  • VG
    VAN GO INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -10%
  • NY
    NEW YORK MUSICAL FESTIVAL
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • RV
    RAINBOW VILLAGE PROPERTIES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Louis Economic Development Partnership

Economic development.

—
2
St Louis Shakespeare Festival

Fostering community and joy across the st. louis region through the shakespearean tradition of art for all.

Arts & Culture
3
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
4
St Louis Sports Commission Inc

Foster economic growth and improved quality of life in the st. louis area by producing events, enhancing its national and international image as a premier sports region, and increasing community awareness of the value of sports.

—
5
Regional Cultural and Performing Arts Development Commission

As the leading public catalyst for arts and culture in st. louis, the regional arts commission leverages the power of creativity to strengthen and enrich our community.

Arts & Culture
6
St Louis Art Museum Foundation

The sole purpose of the foundation is to support the saint louis art museum, including but not limited to fundraising and other activities and assisting in financing expansion and renovation of its facilities.

Arts & Culture
7
Greater St Louis Inc

Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…

Community Improvement
8
St Louis Science Center Foundation

Support the st. louis science center and its comprehensive array of educational outreach programs to the community in order to increase interest, understanding and enthusiasm for stem (science, technology, engineering and mathematics).

Science & Tech
9
St Louis Voices Academy of Media Arts

The mission of st. louis voices academy of media arts is to leverage media arts and storytelling to equip students with the agency to excel academically, author their own futures, and make meaningful contributions in their communities.

Education
10
Jazz St Louis

Jazz st louis is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to lead our community in advancing the uniquely american art of jazz through performance, education, and community engagement.

Arts & Culture
11
Jefferson National Parks Association

Jefferson national parks association provides quality educational products and related services that enhance public understanding and appreciation of america's national parks, public lands and historic places.

Arts & Culture
12
Missouri Historical Society

The missouri historical society (mhs) is a missouri pro forma decree, not-for-profit corporation whose primary functions are educational and community programs; collections and conservation; library and research; and exhibitions.…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Saint Louis Zoo Association; the most unlike its peers is Fishtank Theatre Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $229,050 · OtherKANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $139,396 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBISHOP SEABURY ACADEMY: $79,000 · OtherBISHOP SEABURY ACADEMYSAINT LOUIS ZOO: $59,400 · OtherSAINT LOUIS ZOOSAINT PETER'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $41,594 · OtherSAINT PETER'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH+17 more: $85,819 · Other+17 moreForest Park Forever Inc: $84,350 · EnvironmentForest Park …THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $32,200 · AnimalsSTARKLOFF DISABILITY INSTITUTE: $10,500 · HealthNATIONAL WWI MUSEUM AND MEMORIAL: $5,900 · Arts & CultureSTIEFEL THEATRE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Arts & CultureFISHTANK THEATRE INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureVAN GO INC: $10,000 · EducationRAINBOW VILLAGE PROPERTIES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesRAINBOW VILLAGE INC: $807 · Human Services
Other$634,259Environment$84,350Animals$32,200Health$10,500Arts & Culture$10,400Education$10,000Human Services$5,807

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $84,350 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetBISHOP SEABURY ACADEMY: $79,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $32,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTARKLOFF DISABILITY INSTITUTE: $10,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVAN GO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL WWI MUSEUM AND MEMORIAL: $5,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDOUGLAS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,639 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAINBOW VILLAGE PROPERTIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDOUGLAS COUNTY CASA PROGRAM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHAWTHORN LEADERSHIP SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTIEFEL THEATRE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFISHTANK THEATRE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetRAINBOW VILLAGE INC: $807 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
  • Who funds BISHOP SEABURY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds STARKLOFF DISABILITY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds VAN GO INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WWI MUSEUM AND MEMORIAL ↗
  • Who funds DOUGLAS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW VILLAGE PROPERTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds DOUGLAS COUNTY CASA PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds HAWTHORN LEADERSHIP SCHOOL FOR GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds STIEFEL THEATRE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FISHTANK THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW VILLAGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The William R Orthwein Jr and Laura Rand Orthwein Foundation Inc · World Wide Technology Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bryan Lynch Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bryan Lynch Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bryan Lynch Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bryan Lynch Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bryan Lynch Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph