Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bryan Cressey and Iliana Sweis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$7.9MHuman Services$538kSocial Science$520kReligion$510kEducation$371kArts & Culture$301kScience & Tech$260kHousing & Shelter$185kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $136k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.7M
$12,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ABOVE BEYOND FAMILY RECOVERY CENTER$1,400,786
AVOCET POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES INC$260,000
HEALTHSPERIEN$50,000
LAKE FOREST ACADEMY$30,000
UIC DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY$30,000
CHICAGO INSTITUTE FOR REBT$28,000
HARVARD LAW SCHOOL$25,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$12,500
GATEWAY FOR CANCER RESEARCH$10,000
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL WOMAN'S BOA$5,000
REVIVE CENTER FOR HOUSING AND HEALI$5,000
PCRM INC$5,000
LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY$5,000
H FOUNDATION$5,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $211k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WILLOW FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $750 → 14%REVIVE CENTER FOR HOUSING AND HEALI: $100k → 14%REVIVE CENTER FOR HOUSING AND HEALI: $25k → 14%REVIVE CENTER FOR HOUSING AND HEALI: $25k → 14%REVIVE CENTER FOR HOUSING AND HEALI: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
TN
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.8M · 23 repeat orgs$972k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
35

Total granted

$9.8M
$616k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+3%

Still filing today

52%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $356k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ADLER PLANETARIUM
    6× · 2019–2024 · $160k · revenue +14%
  • NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $120k · revenue +67%
  • LF
    LAKE FOREST ACADEMY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • CC
    CRESSEY CARES CHARITABLE FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $200k
  • GF
    GREENLIGHT FUND INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +3%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF IL COLLEGE OF MEDICIN
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
2
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
3
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
4
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
8
The Carle Foundation Hospital

To be the trusted partner in all healthcare decisions and to improve health by providing highly accessible, world-class care and services.

Health
9
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
10
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
11
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
12
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is D4C Cares Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/40
Grantees still filing
22/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ABOVE BEYOND FAMILY RECOVERY CENTER: $7,379,708 · OtherABOVE BEYOND FAMILY RECOVERY CENTERHARVARD LAW SCHOOL: $370,000 · Other+36 more: $2,097,773 · Other+36 moreTHE ADLER PLANETARIUM: $160,000 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $162,500 · PhilanthropyD4C CARES INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropySELECT MEDICAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyHOPE THROUGH HEALING HANDS: $12,500 · Philanthropy+3 more: $5,700 · PhilanthropyREVIVE CENTER FOR HOUSING AND HEALING: $155,000 · Human ServicesMARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Human Services+2 more: $5,750 · Human ServicesGATEWAY FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $85,000 · HealthRush University Medical Center: $25,000 · HealthFace the Future Foundation: $20,000 · HealthIMERMAN ANGELS: $7,000 · Health+5 more: $14,500 · HealthLAKE FOREST ACADEMY: $95,000 · EducationGLENWOOD ACADEMY: $45,000 · Education+3 more: $4,500 · EducationGREENLIGHT FUND INC: $100,000 · Community Improvement
Other$9,847,481Arts & Culture$300,250Philanthropy$230,700Human Services$210,750Health$151,500Education$144,500Community Improvement$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $162,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADLER PLANETARIUM: $160,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetREVIVE CENTER FOR HOUSING AND HEALING: $155,000 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGREENLIGHT FUND INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLAKE FOREST ACADEMY: $95,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGATEWAY FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $85,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBARRINGTON CHILDRENS CHARITIES: $55,000 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetMARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGLENWOOD ACADEMY: $45,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetD4C CARES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetFace the Future Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE THROUGH HEALING HANDS: $12,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIN DEFENSE OF ANIMALS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIMERMAN ANGELS: $7,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWILLOW FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE H FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSt Leonard's Ministries: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLa Rabida Children's Hospital: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cara Program: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARRINGTON AREA COMM FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL SOCIETY TO PREVENT BLINDNESS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Zoological Society: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPELOTONIA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVARD MAGAZINE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ADLER PLANETARIUM ↗
  • Who funds REVIVE CENTER FOR HOUSING AND HEALING ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENLIGHT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE FOREST ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY FOR CANCER RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds BARRINGTON CHILDRENS CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLENWOOD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds D4C CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds SELECT MEDICAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Face the Future Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER ↗
  • Who funds STREETWISE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE THROUGH HEALING HANDS ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IN DEFENSE OF ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds IMERMAN ANGELS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL16.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Butler Family Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bryan Cressey and Iliana Sweis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bryan Cressey and Iliana Sweis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bryan Cressey and Iliana Sweis Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bryan Cressey and Iliana Sweis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bryan Cressey and Iliana Sweis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph