Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bruce & Sandy Heerema Charitable Foundat

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$320kInternational$101kArts & Culture$66kRecreation & Sports$20kEducation$10kPhilanthropy$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF THE WAY$25,000
725 MINISTRIES$15,000
THE WELL$10,000
MANY HANDS FOR HAITI$10,000
STORIES FOUNDATION$10,000
SANDY HEEREMA TRUST$1,740
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%MANY HANDS FOR HAITI: $20k → 8%MANY HANDS FOR HAITI: $20k → 8%MANY HANDS FOR HAITI: $20k → 8%MANY HANDS FOR HAITI: $10k → 8%MANY HANDS FOR HAITI: $10k → 8%MANY HANDS FOR HAITI: $10k → 8%MANY HANDS FOR HAITI: $10k → 8%SCHOK & AWE: $5k → 8%SCHOK & AWE: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$690k · 12 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +129% since the first grant, against +51% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

$690k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+129%
+51%

Still filing today

33%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureReligionInternationalCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MANY HANDS FOR HAITI
    7× · 2019–2025 · $100k · revenue +129%
  • 7M
    725 MINISTRIES
    2× · 2019–2025 · $23k · revenue +31%
  • SA
    SCHOK AND AWE INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $6k · revenue +476%

Funded once

  • PH
    PELLA HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +278%
  • PB
    PELLA BOOSTER CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • U
    UNITE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
2
Seeds of Change Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Le Pont International - a Bridge to Africa

Le pont international aims to transform lives and communities by equipping the church, empowering the community, and educating children.

International
4
Mission Mutual

Equipping mission, ministry, and philanthropic organizations (of similar vision) with the organizational and relational perspective needed to accelerate and enhance their collective impact. mission mutual exists to provide centralized…

International
5
Emmanne Ministries

We point people to jesus through loving action and the life-giving word.

International
6
Shebuilds Foundation

To accelerate social, economic, and environmental progress globally by equipping entrepreneurs, innovators, and change makers with the tools to scale their impact

Community Improvement
7
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
8
The Global Hunger Project

The hunger project is working to create a world without hunger through women-centered, holistic development strategies that address the root causes of hunger and poverty. in 2025, it reached nearly 12.7 million people in over 10,000…

International
9
Global Seed Planters

Supportive ministry in countries such as china, india, & uganda. preaching and teaching the gospel, aiding farming and water initiatives, and serving the needs of women and girls.

International
10
Partnership for Indigenous Peoples -Pipes - International

We are a global Christian organization committed to partnering with indigenous peoples, local churches, and community-based organizations to make disciples of Jesus Christ and help end extreme poverty. We serve indigenous pygmies,…

International
11
Shadow of His Wings

Shadow of his wings is a ministry, raised up by god, called to "change the world one woman at a time for jesus christ". there is a sense of urgency to help women understand their need of knowing god with all their heart, mind and soul as…

International
12
Iris Global

Iris global: empowered by the love of god to stop for the one in need through worship, outreach, family, education, relief, development, healing, and the arts.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Many Hands for Haiti; the most unlike its peers is Unite. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE WAY: $200,000 · OtherTHE WAYIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHURCH OF THE WAY: $75,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE WAYIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE WELL: $55,000 · OtherTHE WELLPELLA OPERA HOUSE: $40,500 · OtherPELLA OPERA HOUSE+11 more: $77,645 · Other+11 moreMANY HANDS FOR HAITI: $100,000 · Human ServicesMANY HANDS FOR …SCHOK AND AWE INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesSCHOK AND AWE I…PELLA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25,000 · Arts & Culture725 MINISTRIES: $22,500 · ReligionSTORIES FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Crime & LegalIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationPELLA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,500 · PhilanthropyTECHNOSERVE INC: $5,000 · International
Other$608,145Human Services$106,000Arts & Culture$25,000Religion$22,500Crime & Legal$10,000Education$10,000Philanthropy$6,500International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMANY HANDS FOR HAITI: $100,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetPELLA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budget725 MINISTRIES: $22,500 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetSTORIES FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPELLA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSCHOK AND AWE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetTECHNOSERVE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MANY HANDS FOR HAITI ↗
  • Who funds PELLA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds 725 MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds STORIES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITE ↗
  • Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PELLA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SCHOK AND AWE INC ↗
  • Who funds TECHNOSERVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vermeer Charitable FoundationIA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vermeer Charitable Foundation · Sam & Lisa Van Maanen Charitable Foundation · Vanden Bosch Foundation · Mark & Kay Decook Charitable Founda · R & L Vermeer Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bruce & Sandy Heerema Charitable Foundat funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bruce & Sandy Heerema Charitable Foundat. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bruce & Sandy Heerema Charitable Foundat?

    Find your warmest path to Bruce & Sandy Heerema Charitable Foundat through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bruce & Sandy Heerema Charitable Foundat’s filings →

    More from the funding graph