· Private foundation
Browning Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BE GOOD FOUNDATION INC | $7,500 |
| BOOTS TO HEALTH FOUNDATION INC | $6,500 |
| LEE PESKY LEARNING CENTER INC | $5,250 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN FRENCH BULLDOG RESCUE | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY CANCER SERVICES | $5,000 |
| VOICE FOR THE ANIMALS | $5,000 |
| SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC | $5,000 |
| BILL OF RIGHTS INSTITUTE | $5,000 |
| DOMINIFARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY | $5,000 |
| IDAHO FOOD WAREHOUSE INC | $5,000 |
| BUILDING YOUTH AROUND THE WORLD | $3,500 |
| MAGIC VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL INC | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RFRide For Joy Therapeutic Riding Program Inc4× · 2020–2024 · $52k · revenue +7%
- MVMAGIC VALLEY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC6× · 2018–2023 · $30k · revenue +4% · 28% of their budget
- IFIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE4× · 2018–2022 · $25k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- OBORTON BOTANICAL GARDEN INCone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -40%
- BOBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS Uone grant, 2021 · $13k
- ATA Time For Change Movement Incone grant, 2018 · $10k · 27% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Idaho Animal Rescue Network is a 501(c)(3) non-profit based in Idaho that works in Idaho and Eastern Washington to educate, advocate, and network with other rescues and law enforcement in Idaho regarding animal cruelty and neglect. We are…
The organization provides animal care, animal shelter and adoption opportunities for thousands of dogs and cats located in the city of twin falls, idaho and in the surrounding in the city of twin falls, idaho and in the surrounding
The mission is to protect and care for homeless animals in the Dillon and Beaverhead county area.
The Idaho Wildlife Federation (IWF) promotes the conservation of Idaho's wildlife heritage and legacy of sporting opportunities for the current and future generations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Idaho and the most unlike its peers is A Time for Change Movement Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Ride For Joy Therapeutic Riding Program Inc ↗
- Who funds La Posada Inc ↗
- Who funds MAGIC VALLEY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds VOICE FOR THE ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds GENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOUSING NORTHWEST - IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds Family Health Services Corporation ↗
- Who funds BE GOOD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BUILDING YOUTH AROUND THE WORLD ↗
- Who funds ORTON BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds LEE PESKY LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds A Time For Change Movement Inc ↗
- Who funds LONELY ENTREPRENEUR INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds TWIN FALLS OPTIMIST YOUTH HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MAGIC VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds UC LAW SF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Snake River Waterkeeper Inc ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds NCCN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PETS FOR THE ELDERLY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF IDAHO ↗
- Who funds BOOTS TO HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DIVINE DROPS ↗
- Who funds THE NORTHERN LIGHTHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF THE MAGIC VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds Bill of Rights Institute ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN FRENCH BULLDOG RESCUE ↗
- Who funds DOMINIFARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO HUNGER RELIEF TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds Community Cancer Services Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · First Federal Foundation Inc · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Janice Seagraves Family Foundation Inc · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Browning Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.