· Public charity
Broken Star Pbc Sheriffs Office Inc
To raise, receive and maintain a fund or funds of real or personal property, or both.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $25,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $246,850 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $221,850 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE LEGACY CLOSET | $15,000 |
| KAITLIN A KAZANJIAN MEMORIAL SCHOLA | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LELAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC7× · 2017–2023 · $70k · revenue +32%
- PBPOLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATON CHARITY FUND INC3× · 2021–2023 · $35k · revenue +200%
- BABELLA'S ANGELS INC2× · 2022–2023 · $30k · revenue +322%
Funded once
- BDBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +153%
- SWServing with GRACE Incone grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue -12%
- TPTHE PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF'S FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +128%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
None
To provide support for the families of law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty and to provide support to law enforcement officers' who are disabled in the line of duty by the felonious act of another and to provide assistance…
The police and kids foundation was created to support families of florida 1st responders who die in the line of duty, provide equipment grants t o1st responders and to support children of tampa bay.
The boca raton police foundation mission is to back boca's finest by funding the latest technology and training to enhance the safety of our community. the foundation will enact its mission through providing supplementary funding for the…
The Purpose of the organization is to provide support and assistance to the West Palm Beach force through special programs, award recognition and capital for special purchases for which the city or grant money is unavaliable.
To improve public safety in the city of sarasota, florida, by providing resources and support to the sarasota city police department that are not readily available through other means.
The PBPFF is a charitable organization that supports the Town of Palm Beach First Responders and the local community at large with education, equipment and advocacy; empowering peace of mind with the knowledge that their families and…
The mission of the Tampa Police Benevolent Association is to support and defend the Constitution of the United States and of the State of Florida; to promote social charitable and educational activities; to ensure fidelity to duty under…
Reduction of crime by providing rewards for citizens to anonymously report information allowing law enforcement to arrest felons, recover property and confiscate narcotics.
To provide support for Daytona Beach Police Department education, training, technology and equipment that is not funded by city tax dollars. The Foundation provides additional funding and services which positively affects the safety and…
To aid the surviving family members, friends and co-workers of law enforcement officers who have died in the line of duty
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Police Benevolent Associaton Charity Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Serving with Grace Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATON CHARITY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BELLA'S ANGELS INC ↗
- Who funds KAITLIN A KAZANJIAN MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDNET INC ↗
- Who funds Serving with GRACE Inc ↗
- Who funds JUPITER POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BARKY PINES ANIMAL RESCUE & SANCTUARY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE MCDAVID GROUP CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds HER FUTURE COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds BELIEVERS ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds PALM BEACH COUNTY POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Denise Amber Lee Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Broken Star Pbc Sheriffs Office Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Denise Amber Lee Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Broken Star Pbc Sheriffs Office Inc?
Find your warmest path to Broken Star Pbc Sheriffs Office Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.