Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bridgemill Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$367k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$7.6MEnvironment$3.7MEducation$1.3MHousing & Shelter$895kHealth$644kInternational$583kPublic Safety & Disaster$252kEmployment$246kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $1,369,908, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,060,240 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,690,332 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $485k
  • $250k+2 grants · $725k
$45,601
Median grant
6
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND - 1899 SHS ALPHABET INC CL A$367,352
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND - 1559 SHS AMAZON COM INC$357,572
NATURE CONSERVANCY - 238 SHS MASTERCARD INC CL A$127,178
ECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL - 338 SHS VISA INC CL A$106,298
AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC - 441 SHS AMAZON COM INC$101,148
ZANAAFRICA FOUNDATION$100,000
WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC - 95 SHS MASTERCARD INC CL A$50,764
RESOURCE (NP COMM ENTERPRISE INC) - 145 SHS VISA INC CL A$45,601
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION - 86 SHS VISA INC CL A$27,054
REACH PREP INC - 81 SHS VISA INC CL A$25,474
ECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL - 111 SHS ALPHABET INC CL A$21,472
NEW YORK YOUTH SYMPHONY INC - 32 SHS VISA INC CL A$10,099
FARM & WILDERNESS FOUNDATION INC - 56 SHS AMAZON COM INC$10,087
NEW CANAAN NATURE CENTER ASSOCIATION INC$10,000
ADAM J LEWIS ACADEMY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $301k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ZANAAFRICA FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%ZANAAFRICA FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZANAAFRICA CORP: $100k → 14%UNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $958 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MT
NY
MA
WY
CT
CO
VA
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Bridgemill Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Bridgemill Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 8 repeat orgs$8.7M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
102

Total granted

$4.3M
$7.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+48%

Still filing today

63%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationRecreation & SportsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    2× · 2018–2020 · $146k · revenue +111%
  • FA
    FARM AND WILDERNESS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue +19%
  • NC
    New Canaan Nature Center Association Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • MG
    MS GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING-DAVID C WILSON FUND DAF
    one grant, 2021 · $1.2M
  • ED
    ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND - 2023 SHS APPLE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $396k
  • ED
    ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND - 560 SHS THERMO
    one grant, 2022 · $309k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
2
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
5
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
6
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
7
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation

The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…

Health
8
African Parks Foundation of America

To engage the united states and its citizens in the work of african parks and to promote access to american experience and expertise in the african parks actiities by 1) raising funds for specific projects, activities, training, equipment…

Recreation & Sports
9
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
10
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
11
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Union Settlement Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alliance for Vermont Communities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 124 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MS GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING-JOHN HT WILSON JR FUND: $1,203,865 · OtherMS GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING-JOHN HT WILSON JR FUNDMS GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING-BURNS FAMILY FUND (ATT): $1,203,852 · OtherMS GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING-BURNS FAMILY FUND (ATT)MS GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING-THE WILLOW FUND (SEE ATT): $1,203,832 · OtherMS GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING-THE WILLOW FUND (SEE ATT)MS GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING-DAVID C WILSON FUND DAF: $1,202,830 · OtherMS GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING-DAVID C WILSON FUND DAF+110 more: $7,475,697 · Other+110 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZANAAFRICA CORP: $300,000 · Human Services+1 more: $958 · Human ServicesAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $222,360 · InternationalENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $146,363 · EnvironmentNew Canaan Nature Center Association Inc: $15,000 · EnvironmentTHE INSTITUTE FOR ETHNOMEDICINE INC DBA BRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS: $25,353 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $10,000 · HealthFARM AND WILDERNESS FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsREACH PREP INC: $10,450 · EducationADAM J LEWIS ACADEMY INC: $5,000 · Education
Other$12,290,076Human Services$300,958International$222,360Environment$161,363Health$35,353Recreation & Sports$20,000Education$15,450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZANAAFRICA CORP: $300,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $222,360 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $146,363 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR ETHNOMEDICINE INC DBA BRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS: $25,353 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFARM AND WILDERNESS FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNew Canaan Nature Center Association Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR VERMONT COMMUNITIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetREAD TO LEAD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetADAM J LEWIS ACADEMY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $958 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZANAAFRICA CORP ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN11.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bridgemill Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bridgemill Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Farm and Wilderness Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 124 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bridgemill’s filings →

More from the funding graph