Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brickley Harry Dr Farm Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$630k
Granted FY2025still arriving
49
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0169% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.5MYouth Development$105kPhilanthropy$62kHuman Services$62kReligion$18kArts & Culture$17kAnimals$16kCommunity Improvement$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k39 grants · $109k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $477k
$2,500
Median grant
13
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION$100,000
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO$100,000
IVY TECH FOUNDATION$76,600
INDIGENOUS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$50,000
WELLS COUNTY FOUNDATION$50,000
WELLS COUNTY 4H ASSOCIATION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
WELLS COUNTY 4H SWINE BOOSTERS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,145
Individual grant recipient$7,150
Individual grant recipient$6,363
Individual grant recipient$6,100
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SOM SCHOLAR$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HELPING HANDS: $5k → 9%HELPING HANDS: $2k → 9%HELPING HANDS: $1k → 9%HELPING HANDS: $1k → 9%HELPING HANDS: $1k → 9%FAMILY CENTERED SERVICES INC: $250 → 9%FAMILY CENTERED SERVICES INC: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
SD
IN
OH
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
SC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 48 repeat orgs$910k to everyone else

48 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
34

Total granted

$1.2M
$535k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+54%

Still filing today

21%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $375k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEnvironmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IT
    IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $426k · revenue +208%
  • WC
    WELLS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $73k · revenue +52%
  • HU
    Huntington University
    2× · 2022–2023 · $12k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • MU
    MARIAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • UW
    UNIV WISCONSON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
2
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
3
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
4
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
5
Indiana University Alumni Association Inc

The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…

—
6
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
7
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
9
Indiana Wesleyan University

Indiana wesleyan university is a christ-centered academic community committed to changing the world by developing students in character, scholarship, and leadership.

Education
10
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Wayne County Indiana Foundation Inc

To foster and encourage private philanthropic giving, to enhance the spirit of community, and to improve the quality of life in the wayne county, indiana, area now and for future generations.

Philanthropy
12
Franklin College of Indiana

Franklin College empowers students through an experiential education, grounded in the liberal arts and sciences, promoting impactful careers and meaningful lives.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ivy Tech Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Helping Hand Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SOM SCHOLAR: $119,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SOM SCHOLARIndividual grant recipient: $117,682 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMARIAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherMARIAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONUNIV WISCONSON FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherUNIV WISCONSON FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTAUNIVERSITY NORTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY NORTH DAKOTA FOUNDATIONJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONOKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO: $100,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIOIndividual grant recipient: $95,671 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWELLS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC: $73,070 · Other+67 more: $404,282 · Other+67 moreIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $426,100 · EducationIVY TECH FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIO…WELLS COUNTY FOUNDATION INC: $62,000 · EducationWELLS COUNTY FOUNDATION INCINDIGENOUS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $50,000 · EducationINDIGENOUS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE+2 more: $17,100 · EducationHISTORIC WARREN INC: $11,000 · Arts & CultureNewfields Inc: $2,000 · Arts & CultureINDIANA MEDICAL HISTORY MUSEUM INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCENTRAL INDIANA DANCE ENSEMBLE: $1,000 · Arts & CultureThe Helping Hand Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY CENTERED SERVICES INC: $350 · Human ServicesINDIANA FFA FOUNDATION INC: $5,300 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentDucks Unlimited Inc: $3,700 · EnvironmentFORT WAYNE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · AnimalsLAUNCH CAMPUS MINISTRY INC: $500 · Religion
Other$1,509,705Education$655,200Arts & Culture$16,000Human Services$10,350Youth Development$7,300Environment$3,700Animals$1,000Religion$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $426,100 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELLS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC: $73,070 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetWELLS COUNTY FOUNDATION INC: $62,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetINDIGENOUS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetHuntington University: $12,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORIC WARREN INC: $11,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetThe Helping Hand Inc: $10,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetINDIANA FFA FOUNDATION INC: $5,300 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $3,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNewfields Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA MEDICAL HISTORY MUSEUM INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WAYNE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL INDIANA DANCE ENSEMBLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLAUNCH CAMPUS MINISTRY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY CENTERED SERVICES INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WELLS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WELLS COUNTY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIGENOUS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds Huntington University ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC WARREN INC ↗
  • Who funds The Helping Hand Inc ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA FFA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN16.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brickley Harry Dr Farm Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brickley Harry Dr Farm Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 95 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brickley Harry Dr Farm’s filings →

    More from the funding graph