Skip to content

· Public charity

Brian M Anselmo Memorial Foundation

Knowing that brian believed in the jesuit tradition of being "a man for others," it is our aim to positively touch the lives of others through charitable giving, promoting educational opportunities and promoting animal welfare in his name.

$199k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$844kReligion$404kPublic Safety & Disaster$204kEducation$120kHuman Services$104kInternational$64kPhilanthropy$52kAnimals$46kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $170,921, the rows itemized in this filing. The $198,852 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $27,931 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $93k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
$18,302
Median grant
2
States reached
$58k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST THOMAS MORE$60,751
THE DREAM FACTORY$26,086
BAGS OF FUN$21,076
TEAMSMILE$18,302
KIDS TLC$17,422
MIDWEST ANIMAL RESCUE$10,440
CHARLIE'S HOUSE$8,844
TEMPLE MADE FOUNDATION$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 53% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%THE DREAM FACTORY: $56k → 8%CHARLIE'S HOUSE: $71k → 8%DO GOOD CO: $25k → 15%KIDS TLC: $44k → 5%THE DREAM FACTORY: $54k → 8%CHARLIE'S HOUSE: $35k → 8%DO GOOD CO: $18k → 15%KIDS TLC: $23k → 5%THE DREAM FACTORY: $28k → 8%CHARLIE'S HOUSE: $27k → 8%KIDS TLC: $17k → 5%THE DREAM FACTORY: $26k → 8%CHARLIE'S HOUSE: $21k → 8%ST THOMAS MORE: $87k → 15%THE DREAM FACTORY: $16k → 8%ST THOMAS MORE: $61k → 15%ST THOMAS MORE: $49k → 15%NOAH'S BANDAGE PROJECT: $32k → 5%ST THOMAS MORE: $33k → 15%NOAH'S BANDAGE PROJECT: $26k → 5%ST THOMAS MORE: $31k → 15%NOAH'S BANDAGE PROJECT: $25k → 5%TEAMSMILE: $66k → 8%ST THOMAS MORE: $21k → 15%NOAH'S BANDAGE PROJECT: $22k → 5%TEAMSMILE: $39k → 8%NOAH'S BANDAGE PROJECT: $17k → 5%TEAMSMILE: $27k → 8%TEAMSMILE: $26k → 8%ST JOHN REGIS: $19k → 15%TEAMSMILE: $21k → 8%ST JOHN REGIS: $18k → 15%TEAMSMILE: $18k → 8%ST JOHN REGIS: $16k → 15%ST JOHN REGIS: $16k → 15%ROCKHURST HIGH SCHOOL: $27k → 15%ROCKHURST HIGH SCHOOL: $22k → 15%ROCKHURST HIGH SCHOOL: $21k → 15%ROCKHURST HIGH SCHOOL: $18k → 15%BAGS OF FUN: $82k → 15%BAGS OF FUN: $48k → 15%BAGS OF FUN: $39k → 15%BAGS OF FUN: $37k → 15%BAGS OF FUN: $32k → 15%BAGS OF FUN: $31k → 15%BAGS OF FUN: $21k → 15%BAGS OF FUN: $17k → 15%OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH: $18k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 12 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$1.8M
$16k

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPublic Safety & DisasterEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GABBY KRAUSE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $306k · revenue +109%
  • TD
    THE DREAM FACTORY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $211k · revenue +15%
  • TI
    TEAMSMILE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $206k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • SL
    ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SM
    ST MICHAEL THE ARCHANGEL CATHOLIC CHURCH LEAWOOD
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bounce Children's Foundation

Bounce children's foundation transforms the lives of chronically ill children, and their families, shifting all from surviving to thriving.

Health
2
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
3
Kids Crossing

Kids crossing's vision is to provide a safe and caring home for every child. our mission is to strengthen families so they may provide the best care for those children entrusted to them.

Human Services
4
The Children's Place Inc

Provide mental health services to promote resiliency, wellness and positive developmental outcomes through prevention, treatment, education and family support for children under the age of 9 who have experienced abuse, neglect and other…

Crime & Legal
5
Special Love Inc

To provide cancer families a network of support, made up of other patients and families who know and understand the trials and triumphs of the cancer experience.

Health
6
Chain of Hope Kc

Outreach to help animals suffering in the urban core of kansas city.

Animals
7
CancerFree Kids

CancerFree KIDS exists to raise awareness of the need for more funding for pediatric cancer research and to raise funds that are invested in early stage, potentially game-changing research focused on gentler treatments and cures for…

Health
8
The Curetivity Foundation

Provide monetary or financial aid exclusively for charitable, religious, scientific, literary or educational purposes and to solicit, receive, maintain and disburse funds for these purposes and for the betterment of children.

Health
9
Wichitas Littlest Heroes

Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…

Human Services
10
Kosair Charities Committee Inc

Kosair for kids mission is to enhance the health and well-being of children by delivering financial support for healthcare, research, education, social services, and child advocacy.

Health
11
Kid in the Corner

Youth suicide awareness and prevention

Health
12
Cherished Creations Inc

To assist in the lives of seriously ill children

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Operation Breakthrough Inc; the most unlike its peers is Midwest Animal Resq. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE GABBY KRAUSE FOUNDATION: $306,098 · HealthTHE GABBY KRAUSE FOUNDATIONTHE DREAM FACTORY INC: $210,661 · HealthTHE DREAM FACTORY INCTEAMSMILE INC: $206,187 · HealthTEAMSMILE INCNOAH'S BANDAGE PROJECT: $121,100 · HealthNOAH'S BANDAGE PROJECTST THOMAS MORE: $300,068 · OtherST THOMAS MOREROCKHURST HIGH SCHOOL: $109,803 · OtherROCKHURST HIGH SCHOOLKIDSTLC INC: $104,222 · OtherKIDSTLC INCST REGIS ACADEMY: $98,746 · OtherST REGIS ACADEMY+3 more: $23,500 · OtherCHARLIES HOUSE INC: $204,399 · Public Safety & DisasterCHARLIES HOU…OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $63,500 · EducationDo Good 4 Co: $52,000 · PhilanthropyMIDWEST ANIMAL RESQ: $46,239 · Animals
Health$844,046Other$636,339Public Safety & Disaster$204,399Education$63,500Philanthropy$52,000Animals$46,239

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GABBY KRAUSE FOUNDATION: $306,098 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetTHE DREAM FACTORY INC: $210,661 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetTEAMSMILE INC: $206,187 over 7y, 4.7% of budgetCHARLIES HOUSE INC: $204,399 over 8y, 23% of budgetNOAH'S BANDAGE PROJECT: $121,100 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetKIDSTLC INC: $104,222 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $63,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDo Good 4 Co: $52,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetMIDWEST ANIMAL RESQ: $46,239 over 4y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GABBY KRAUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE DREAM FACTORY INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAMSMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLIES HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds NOAH'S BANDAGE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds KIDSTLC INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
  • Who funds Do Good 4 Co ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST ANIMAL RESQ ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO24.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Greater Horizons · McCullough Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Servant Foundation · The Kansas City Royals Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brian M Anselmo Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brian M Anselmo Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brian M Anselmo Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph