Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brenda Abramson Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$163kArts & Culture$83kAnimals$41kHuman Services$33kInternational$22kEnvironment$18kEducation$16kReligion$5k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$5,000
TOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$5,000
ST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$5,000
DAVID SHELDRICK ELEPHANT ORPHANAGE$3,500
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES LOS ANGELES$2,500
ALLIES FOR EVERY CHILD$2,500
CROSSROADS SCHOOL$2,500
DIAN FOSSEY GORILLA FUND$2,500
ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION$2,500
L A PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION$2,500
PILCHUCK GLASS SCHOOL$2,500
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$1,500
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$1,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ALLIES FOR EVERY CHILD: $3k → 14%ALLIES FOR EVERY CHILD: $3k → 14%ALLIES FOR EVERY CHILD: $3k → 14%ALLIES FOR EVERY CHILD: $3k → 14%ALLIES FOR EVERY CHILD: $3k → 14%ALLIES FOR EVERY CHILD: $3k → 14%ALLIES FOR EVERY CHILD: $3k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$339k · 20 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
4

Total granted

$339k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+97%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +99%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    7× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +17%
  • AF
    Allies for Every Child Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • WA
    WALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +71%
  • H
    HASASSAH
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • AM
    ACADEMY MUSEUM OF MOTION PICTURES
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
3
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
6
Chile-California Council

The Chile-California Council is a San Francisco-based nonprofit dedicated to developing and promoting joint endeavors and cooperative relations between Chile and California, as well as individuals, legal entities and other institutions in…

International
7
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
8
The International Dark-Sky Association Inc

Darksky international restores the nighttime environment and protects communities from the harmful effects of light pollution through outreach, advocacy, and conservation.

—
9
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
10
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
11
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Allies for Every Child Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $37,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODDAVID SHELDRICK ELEPHANT ORPHANAGE: $24,500 · OtherDAVID SHELDRICK ELEPHANT ORPHANAGEL A PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $17,000 · OtherL A PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATIONDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc: $15,000 · OtherDian Fossey Gorilla Fund Internationa…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICESCROSSROADS SCHOOLS: $6,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES LOS ANGELES: $5,000 · OtherHASASSAH: $5,000 · OtherACADEMY MUSEUM OF MOTION PICTURES: $5,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $35,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL …Children's Hospital Los Angeles: $35,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los AngelesTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $35,000 · HealthTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATIONELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUND…WALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $30,000 · Arts & CultureWALLIS ANNENBERG C…PILCHUCK GLASS SCHOOL: $18,500 · Arts & CulturePILCHUCK GLASS SCH…THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $12,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF CONT…DIRECT RELIEF: $15,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,500 · InternationalNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $9,500 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $8,750 · EnvironmentAllies for Every Child Inc: $17,500 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesCROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES: $10,000 · EducationNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $1,250 · Animals
Other$125,000Health$125,000Arts & Culture$60,500International$21,500Environment$18,250Human Services$18,000Education$10,000Animals$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPILCHUCK GLASS SCHOOL: $18,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAllies for Every Child Inc: $17,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $9,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $8,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED IN HARMONY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds TOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PILCHUCK GLASS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Allies for Every Child Inc ↗
  • Who funds Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED IN HARMONY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brenda Abramson Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brenda Abramson Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brenda Abramson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph