Skip to content

· Public charity

Bradley Henry Barnes and Leila Barnes Memorial Trust C/O Main Street Community

To support the charitable activities of the main street community foundation by improving the health, medical care and wellness of the southington, ct community.

$904k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$2.6MHuman Services$1.6MFood & Nutrition$965kArts & Culture$511kPhilanthropy$471kRecreation & Sports$250kEducation$231kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $89k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $811k
$60,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVEWELL$150,000
WHEELER CLINIC$116,422
SENIOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INC$113,127
YALE UNIVERSITY$100,000
PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER$85,000
SOUTHINGTON COMMUNITY CULTURAL ARTS INC$81,750
LEWIS EDUCATIONAL AGRICULTURAL FARM$60,000
BREAD FOR LIFE INC$54,400
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC$50,000
SOUTHINGTON LAND CONSERVATION TRUST$30,000
EARLY CHILDHOOD COLLABORATIVE OF SOUTHINGTON$28,500
FRIENDS OF SOUTHINGTON COMMUNITY SERVICES$20,500
SOUTHINGTON MANNA FUND INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.2M · 17 repeat orgs$250k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

$6.2M
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+14%

Still filing today

88%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $153k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionArts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SOUTHINGTON-CHESHIRE COMMUNITY YMCA
    7× · 2018–2024 · $893k · revenue +22%
  • LA
    LIVEWELL ALLIANCE INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $610k · revenue +44%
  • PC
    PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $589k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • TO
    THE ORCHARDS AT SOUTHINGTON
    one grant, 2024 · $33k · revenue +7%
  • ST
    SENIOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $27k · revenue +130%
  • ES
    EASTER SEAL REHABILITATION CENTER OF GREATER WATERBURY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Association of Health Care Facilities Inc

The association is the leader in providing services to and advocating for, the state's providers of long-term, subacute, rehabilitative, and assisted living care. additionally, the association serves as a clearing house for information…

—
2
Visiting Nurse Services of Connecticut Inc

Visiting Nurse Services of Connecticut, Inc., (VNS) a nonprofit health care provider, finds its mission in the provision of quality home health and hospice services to individuals, families and the communities it serves. VNS is committed…

—
3
Whitney Center Inc

Whitney center's mission, excellence in senior living, is grounded in the principal that all elders, regardless of physical or cognitive limitation, have the right to engage in life and seek fulfillment. our ideals of self-determination,…

Human Services
4
Center for Hospice Care Southeast Connecticut Inc

Provide Health and Supportive Services to terminally ill individuals at their home or in a medical facility in Southeastern Connecticut.

—
5
Connecticut Community Care Inc

Connecticut community care, inc provides person-centered care coordination and transition services for elders and individuals with disabilities to help ensure they can live safely in the place they choose to live. people served experience…

Health
6
Hartford HealthCare at Home Inc

The mission of the agency is to provide and safeguard quality home health care to all persons in need, especially the indigent and medically underserved population. The agency strongly believes that appropriate health care is a fundamental…

Health
7
Hartford Hospital

To improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.

Health
8
Natchaug Hospital Inc

The mission of Natchaug Hospital is to provide a continuum of accessible, community-based services for those living with psychiatric illness and chemical dependency or emotional and related educational disabilities, with a commitment to…

Health
9
Saint Mary Home Incorporated

We, mercy community health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming presence within our communities. saint mary home is a member of mercy community health and trinity health.

—
10
Southminster Inc

At southminster, our mission is to embrace community, caring and collaboration to enrich the lives of those we serve. we are southminster.

Human Services
11
Hartford HealthCare Corporation

Hartford HealthCare's mission is to improve the health and healing of the people and communities it serves.

Health
12
Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists Pllc

The Mission of Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists, PLLC is to put the patients first, provide coordinated quality care and value, exceed the expectations of patients, providers, staff and the community that it serves.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc of Southington Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lewis Educational Agricultural Farm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIVEWELL ALLIANCE INC: $610,000 · OtherLIVEWELL ALLIANCE INCTHE ARC OF SOUTHINGTON INC: $220,158 · OtherTHE ARC OF SOUTHINGTON INCCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER NEW BRITAIN: $198,925 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREA…SOUTHINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $167,007 · OtherSOUTHINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDA…SENIOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INC: $113,127 · OtherSENIOR TRANSPORTATION SERVIC…Friends of Southington Community Services: $108,500 · OtherFriends of Southington Commu…LIVING IN SAFE ALTERNATIVES INC: $98,820 · OtherLIVING IN SAFE ALTERNATIVES …Southington Rotary Trust: $89,635 · Other+5 more: $99,000 · Other+5 moreSOUTHINGTON-CHESHIRE COMMUNITY YMCA: $893,497 · Human ServicesSOUTHINGTON-CHESHIRE COMMU…PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC: $589,400 · Human ServicesPRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER I…MULBERRY GARDENS OF SOUTHINGTON LLC: $72,125 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesWHEELER CLINIC INC: $531,981 · HealthWHEELER CLINIC IN…The Hospital of Central Connecticut: $367,179 · HealthThe Hospital of C…HARTFORD HEALTHCARE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $170,000 · HealthHARTFORD HEALTHCA…BREAD FOR LIFE INC: $465,380 · Food & NutritionBREAD FOR LIFE…Lewis Educational Agricultural Farm: $390,750 · Food & NutritionLewis Educatio…THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $475,000 · EducationTHE UNIVE…Yale University: $100,000 · EducationYale Univ…SOUTHINGTON COMMUNITY CULTURAL ARTS INC: $511,400 · Arts & CultureUNITED WAY OF SOUTHINGTON INC: $470,706 · PhilanthropyTHE ORCHARDS AT SOUTHINGTON: $33,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,705,172Human Services$1,560,022Health$1,069,160Food & Nutrition$856,130Education$575,000Arts & Culture$511,400Philanthropy$470,706Housing & Shelter$33,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHINGTON-CHESHIRE COMMUNITY YMCA: $893,497 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetLIVEWELL ALLIANCE INC: $610,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetPRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC: $589,400 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetWHEELER CLINIC INC: $531,981 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHINGTON COMMUNITY CULTURAL ARTS INC: $511,400 over 8y, 31% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $475,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHINGTON INC: $470,706 over 7y, 37% of budgetBREAD FOR LIFE INC: $465,380 over 8y, 20% of budgetLewis Educational Agricultural Farm: $390,750 over 7y, 33% of budgetThe Hospital of Central Connecticut: $367,179 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF SOUTHINGTON INC: $220,158 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER NEW BRITAIN: $198,925 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetHARTFORD HEALTHCARE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $170,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFriends of Southington Community Services: $108,500 over 5y, 27% of budgetYale University: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING IN SAFE ALTERNATIVES INC: $98,820 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetSouthington Rotary Trust: $89,635 over 2y, 78% of budgetMULBERRY GARDENS OF SOUTHINGTON LLC: $72,125 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ORCHARDS AT SOUTHINGTON: $33,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSENIOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INC: $27,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetEASTER SEAL REHABILITATION CENTER OF GREATER WATERBURY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF SOUTHINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $7,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetTRICIRCLE CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater New BritainCT30.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater New Britain · Main Street Community Foundation Inc · American Savings Foundation Inc · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · Ion Bank Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · United Way of Southington Inc · The Joe and Kay Calvanese Foundation Inc · Thomaston Savings Bank Foundation Inc · The Albert and Alice Brunalli Foundation · The Community Chest of New Britain and Berlin Inc · United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bradley Henry Barnes and Leila Barnes Memorial Trust C/O Main Street Community funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bradley Henry Barnes and Leila Barnes Memorial Trust C/O Main Street Community. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 43%
  • The Arc of Southington Inc: 97% of income from government
  • Wheeler Clinic Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Tricircle Corporation: 43% of income from government
  • Prudence Crandall Center Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Southington-Cheshire Community Ymca: 23% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bradley Henry Barnes and Leila Barnes Memorial Trust C/O Main Street’s filings →

More from the funding graph