· Public charity
Bradley Henry Barnes and Leila Barnes Memorial Trust C/O Main Street Community
To support the charitable activities of the main street community foundation by improving the health, medical care and wellness of the southington, ct community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $89k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $811k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LIVEWELL | $150,000 |
| WHEELER CLINIC | $116,422 |
| SENIOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INC | $113,127 |
| YALE UNIVERSITY | $100,000 |
| PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER | $85,000 |
| SOUTHINGTON COMMUNITY CULTURAL ARTS INC | $81,750 |
| LEWIS EDUCATIONAL AGRICULTURAL FARM | $60,000 |
| BREAD FOR LIFE INC | $54,400 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| SOUTHINGTON LAND CONSERVATION TRUST | $30,000 |
| EARLY CHILDHOOD COLLABORATIVE OF SOUTHINGTON | $28,500 |
| FRIENDS OF SOUTHINGTON COMMUNITY SERVICES | $20,500 |
| SOUTHINGTON MANNA FUND INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $153k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSOUTHINGTON-CHESHIRE COMMUNITY YMCA7× · 2018–2024 · $893k · revenue +22%
- PCPRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC8× · 2018–2025 · $589k · revenue +82%
- WCWHEELER CLINIC INC6× · 2018–2025 · $532k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- TOTHE ORCHARDS AT SOUTHINGTONone grant, 2024 · $33k · revenue 0%
- STSENIOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $27k · revenue +130%
- ESEASTER SEAL REHABILITATION CENTER OF GREATER WATERBURY INCone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The association is the leader in providing services to and advocating for, the state's providers of long-term, subacute, rehabilitative, and assisted living care. additionally, the association serves as a clearing house for information…
Visiting Nurse Services of Connecticut, Inc., (VNS) a nonprofit health care provider, finds its mission in the provision of quality home health and hospice services to individuals, families and the communities it serves. VNS is committed…
Whitney center's mission, excellence in senior living, is grounded in the principal that all elders, regardless of physical or cognitive limitation, have the right to engage in life and seek fulfillment. our ideals of self-determination,…
Provide Health and Supportive Services to terminally ill individuals at their home or in a medical facility in Southeastern Connecticut.
Connecticut community care, inc provides person-centered care coordination and transition services for elders and individuals with disabilities to help ensure they can live safely in the place they choose to live. people served experience…
The mission of the agency is to provide and safeguard quality home health care to all persons in need, especially the indigent and medically underserved population. The agency strongly believes that appropriate health care is a fundamental…
To improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.
The mission of Natchaug Hospital is to provide a continuum of accessible, community-based services for those living with psychiatric illness and chemical dependency or emotional and related educational disabilities, with a commitment to…
We, mercy community health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming presence within our communities. saint mary home is a member of mercy community health and trinity health.
At southminster, our mission is to embrace community, caring and collaboration to enrich the lives of those we serve. we are southminster.
Hartford HealthCare's mission is to improve the health and healing of the people and communities it serves.
The Mission of Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists, PLLC is to put the patients first, provide coordinated quality care and value, exceed the expectations of patients, providers, staff and the community that it serves.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc of Southington Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lewis Educational Agricultural Farm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOUTHINGTON-CHESHIRE COMMUNITY YMCA ↗
- Who funds LIVEWELL ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WHEELER CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHINGTON COMMUNITY CULTURAL ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds BREAD FOR LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds Lewis Educational Agricultural Farm ↗
- Who funds The Hospital of Central Connecticut ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF SOUTHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER NEW BRITAIN ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD HEALTHCARE SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of Southington Community Services ↗
- Who funds Yale University ↗
- Who funds LIVING IN SAFE ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds Southington Rotary Trust ↗
- Who funds MULBERRY GARDENS OF SOUTHINGTON LLC ↗
- Who funds THE ORCHARDS AT SOUTHINGTON ↗
- Who funds SENIOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEAL REHABILITATION CENTER OF GREATER WATERBURY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF SOUTHINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY INC ↗
- Who funds TRICIRCLE CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater New Britain · Main Street Community Foundation Inc · American Savings Foundation Inc · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · Ion Bank Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · United Way of Southington Inc · The Joe and Kay Calvanese Foundation Inc · Thomaston Savings Bank Foundation Inc · The Albert and Alice Brunalli Foundation · The Community Chest of New Britain and Berlin Inc · United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bradley Henry Barnes and Leila Barnes Memorial Trust C/O Main Street Community funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Arc of Southington Inc — 97% of income from government
- Wheeler Clinic Inc — 47% of income from government
- Tricircle Corporation — 43% of income from government
- Prudence Crandall Center Inc — 30% of income from government
- Southington-Cheshire Community Ymca — 23% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.