Skip to content
Bradhering Kalouria Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Bradhering Kalouria Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$93k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$39k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$140kSocial Science$91kArts & Culture$52kEducation$40kCommunity Improvement$16kHealth$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kCrime & Legal$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $86k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$-2394
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA$38,500
AMBER WAVES FARM$26,454
CASA DEL HERRERO$10,608
FOOD BANK OF SANTA BARBARA$10,000
GRANADA THEATER$1,336
TENEMENT MUSEUM$1,250
CIVIC INFLUENCES LEWES DE$1,000
EAST HAMPTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,000
BAY STREET THEATER$900
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$500
GUILD HALL EAST HAMPTON$420
SECOND STAGE THEATRE COMPANY NY$400
LOBERO THEATER$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DREAM FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NJ
CA
CO
MD
DE
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$330k · 15 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
16

Total granted

$330k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+30%

Still filing today

40%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionInternationalSocial ScienceEducationPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AW
    AMBER WAVES FARM INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $119k · revenue +63%
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $91k · revenue +243%
  • CD
    CASA DEL HERRERO
    3× · 2022–2024 · $26k · revenue +431%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +212%
  • SB
    SANTA BARBARA INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +88%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Barbara Museum of Art

To integrate art into the lives of people, fostering imagination, stimulating thought, and creating personally rewarding experiences.

Arts & Culture
2
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
3
Museum of American Finance

Finance impacts everyone. as a socially relevant organization, the museum of american finance seeks to improve understanding of the influence of financial institutions and capital markets on the u.s. and global economies, and on…

—
4
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
5
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
6
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
7
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
8
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
9
The Foundation at Hearst Castle

The Foundation at Hearst Castle's mission is to support the conservation and restoration of Hearst Castle, and to offer youth programs for underserved middle school students - To enhance the appreciation of the art and architecture of this…

—
10
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
11
The American Theatre Guild

The american theatre guild is dedicated to providing the experience of live theatre to foster passion, inspire creativity and empower youth within our communities.

Arts & Culture
12
Hill-Stead Museum Board of Governors Inc

To support and to provide advice and assistance to the trustees of the hill-stead museum, a national historic landmark and public charity which preserves, displays and interprets the 1901 colonial home, property, and fine art collections…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMBER WAVES FARM INC: $119,154 · Food & NutritionAMBER WAVES FARM INCFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $16,000 · Food & NutritionFoodbank of Santa Barbara County IncFeeding America: $5,250 · Food & NutritionUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA: $39,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BAR…CASA DEL HERRERO: $25,958 · OtherCASA DEL HERREROIndividual grant recipient: $17,684 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGRANADA THEATER: $4,536 · Other+19 more: $21,625 · Other+19 moreTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $90,775 · Social ScienceTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INCTHE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSANTA BARBARA INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL INC: $4,500 · Arts & CultureBAY STREET THEATRE FESTIVAL INC: $2,150 · Arts & CultureLOWER EAST SIDE TENEMENT MUSEUM: $1,250 · Arts & CultureGEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC: $500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $420 · Arts & CultureWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $250 · InternationalKIND INC: $1,500 · Crime & LegalALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · Health
Food & Nutrition$140,404Other$108,803Social Science$90,775Arts & Culture$13,820International$2,750Crime & Legal$1,500Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMBER WAVES FARM INC: $119,154 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $90,775 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCASA DEL HERRERO: $25,958 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $5,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA BARBARA INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAY STREET THEATRE FESTIVAL INC: $2,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKIND INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOWER EAST SIDE TENEMENT MUSEUM: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST HAMPTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE805 INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUILD HALL OF EAST HAMPTON INC: $420 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GARDEN CLUB OF EAST HAMPTONINC: $280 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundMosher FoundationHutton Foundation Dba…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY13.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Mosher Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bradhering Kalouria Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bradhering Kalouria Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bradhering Kalouria’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home