Skip to content

Wyoming · Private foundation

Brad S & Katherine L Mead Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$35k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
10
Grants FY2025
6
Organizations funded FY2024
50%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$2,500
Largest grant, FY2025
$13,446
Organizations funded a year
1 to 6
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$522k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 50% of the organizations Brad S & Katherine L Mead Charitable Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 33% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving10$35k40%
FY20246$56k50%
FY20234$47k25%
FY20224$34k75%
FY20211$2k100%
FY20201$8k0%
FY20192$9k0%
FY20183$18k100%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$257kEducation$155kEnvironment$22kRecreation & Sports$10kEmployment$8kHealth$5kScience & Tech$5k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 16 grantees
All grantees of Brad S & Katherine L Mead Charitable Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Education Foundation of Jackson Hole$41,00054%
Grand Teton National Park Foundation$22,50030%
Mount Marty University$12,00020%
Northwest Lineman College$11,0001n/a
Community Entry Services Inc$7,50020%
Climb Dba Climb Wyoming$5,50020%
Teton Literacy Center$5,50020%
Wyoming Star Gazing$5,00021%
Mental Health & Recovery Services of Jackson Hole$5,00010%
Teton Valley Ski Education Foundation Inc$5,00011%
Jackson Hole Land Trust$5,00010%
Wyofile$2,0001n/a
Davidson College$2,00010%
Horse Warriors$1,00011%
Becoming Jackson Whole$1,00010%
Girls Actively Participating$1,00010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 9 recipients with no EIN on record ($124k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Brad S & Katherine L Mead Charitable Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEducation Foundation of Jackson Hole: $41,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetGrand Teton National Park Foundation: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMount Marty University: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Entry Services Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetClimb Dba Climb Wyoming: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTeton Literacy Center: $5,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWyoming Star Gazing: $5,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMental Health & Recovery Services of Jackson Hole: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTeton Valley Ski Education Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetJackson Hole Land Trust: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDavidson College: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHorse Warriors: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBecoming Jackson Whole: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGirls Actively Participating: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 14.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Jackson HoleWY17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Karl M Johnson Foundation · Hughes Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Brad S & Katherine L Mead Charitable Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Brad S & Katherine L Mead Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Brad S & Katherine L Mead Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Brad S & Katherine L Mead Charitable Foundation

How much does Brad S & Katherine L Mead Charitable Foundation give?
Brad S & Katherine L Mead Charitable Foundation reported 10 grants totaling $34,946 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 6 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Brad S & Katherine L Mead Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (56%), Education (34%), Environment (5%).
Who are Brad S & Katherine L Mead Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Education Foundation of Jackson Hole ($41k), Grand Teton National Park Foundation ($23k), Mount Marty University ($12k).
Does Brad S & Katherine L Mead Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Brad S & Katherine L Mead Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Brad S & Katherine L Mead Charitable Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Community Foundation of Jackson Hole, Karl M Johnson Foundation, Hughes Charitable Foundation.
Where is Brad S & Katherine L Mead Charitable Foundation based?
Brad S & Katherine L Mead Charitable Foundation is based in WY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Brad S & Katherine L Mead’s filings →

More from the funding graph