Skip to content

· Private foundation

Braatz Fund for Culture Community and Conservation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Environment$58kYouth Development$19kEducation$18kInternational$15kArts & Culture$5kFood & Nutrition$4kHuman Services$2k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$713k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT INC$7,000
NORTH FORK ARTS CENTER INC$5,000
LANDCRAFT GARDEN FOUNDATION INC$5,000
NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT FUND INC$5,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$2,000
TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE$2,000
WESTTOWN SCHOOL$2,000
HURRICANE ISLAND FOUNDATION$1,500
PECONIC BAYKEEPER INC$1,000
EDUCATE THE CHILDREN INC$1,000
COMMUNITY ACTION SOUTHOLD TOWN INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $2k → 12%WESTTOWN SCHOOL: $2k → 6%COMMUNITY ACTION SOUTHOLD TOWN INC: $1k → 7%MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC: $13k → 14%YALE UNIVERSITY - YALE SCHOOL OF FORESTRY & ENVIRO: $4k → 12%HURRICANE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $2k → 12%WESTTOWN SCHOOL: $2k → 6%COMMUNITY ACTION SOUTHOLD TOWN INC: $500 → 7%YALE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%HURRICANE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $1k → 12%WESTTOWN SCHOOL: $1k → 6%PECONIC BAYKEEPER INC: $1k → 7%YALE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT FUND INC: $5k → 7%YALE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 12%NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT FUND INC: $5k → 7%NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT FUND INC: $5k → 7%LANDCRAFT GARDEN FOUNDATION INC: $16k → 7%NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT FUND INC: $5k → 7%LANDCRAFT GARDEN FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 7%BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT INC: $12k → 7%BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT INC: $7k → 7%HALLOCKVILLE INC: $4k → 7%NORTH FORK ARTS CENTER INC: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$92k · 9 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$92k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+61%

Still filing today

78%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LG
    LANDCRAFT GARDEN FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $21k · revenue +20%
  • NS
    NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT FUND INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +29%
  • ET
    EDUCATE THE CHILDREN INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • TM
    The Mountain Institute Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $13k · revenue -61%
  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY - YALE SCHOOL OF FORESTRY & ENVIRO
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • HI
    HALLOCKVILLE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +61%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
East End Food Institute

East End Food is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to support, promote and advocate for farmers and producers, while ensuring everyone in the community can enjoy and be nourished by local food. We envision the East End of Long…

Food & Nutrition
2
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
3
Natural History Institute

Natural History Institute is organized to provide leadership and resources for a revitalized practice of natural history that integrates art, science, and humanities to promote the health and well-being of humans and the rest of the…

Arts & Culture
4
Mountain Top Arboretum Inc

Conserve, enhance, and celebrate our distinctive catskill sanctuary through sustainable horticulture, responsible land stewardship, and innovative educational programming

—
5
Northern Neck Land Conservancy

Northern neck land conservancy's mission is to preserve the rural heritage of the northern neck and essex county by conserving their lands, water, economies and culture for future generations. the land conservancy assists landowners who…

Environment
6
The Great Pond Foundation Inc

Our mission is to cultivate the resilience of our coastal pond ecosystems through science, collaboration, and education.

Environment
7
Nantucket Land & Water Council Inc

Protect nantucket's natural world and rural character by holding and enforcing conservation restrictions, commissioning scientific research, monitoring development proposals, engaging in legal proceedings to protect natural resources, and…

Environment
8
Tuckernuck Land Trust Inc

To preserve land and promote stewardship and education to conserve tuckernuck island's natural communities and unique coastal ecology.

Environment
9
Marine Science Institute

The institutes mission is to cultivate a responsibility for the natural environment and our human communities through interdisciplinary science education.

—
10
Shinnecock Kelp Farmers Incorporated

The organization is formed for the purpose of restoring the health of the shinnecock bay through the cultivation of sugar kelp. activities combine environmental restoration, traditional shinnecock knowledge, climate resilience efforts, and…

Environment
11
Island Institute

The island institute cultivates uncommon conversations about the nature of vital communities, the web of human relationships and responsibilities, and our connections to the greater natural world.

—
12
Nature and Culture International

Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Suffolk Waterfront Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Mountain Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LANDCRAFT GARDEN FOUNDATION INC: $21,233 · EnvironmentLANDCRAFT GARDEN FOUNDATION INCNEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT FUND INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentNEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT FUND INC+1 more: $1,000 · EnvironmentThe Mountain Institute Inc: $13,000 · OtherThe Mountain Institute IncYALE UNIVERSITY: $4,500 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYWESTTOWN SCHOOL: $4,500 · OtherWESTTOWN SCHOOLYALE UNIVERSITY - YALE SCHOOL OF FORESTRY & ENVIRO: $4,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY - YALE SCH…COMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHOLD TOWN INC: $1,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHO…THE BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT INC: $19,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BUTTERFLY EFFECT…THE HURRICANE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE HURRICANE ISLAND…EDUCATE THE CHILDREN INC: $14,500 · Human ServicesEDUCATE THE C…NORTH FORK ARTS CENTER INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureHALLOCKVILLE INC: $3,625 · Arts & CultureTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $4,500 · Education
Environment$42,233Other$27,500Youth Development$21,500Human Services$14,500Arts & Culture$8,625Education$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLANDCRAFT GARDEN FOUNDATION INC: $21,233 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetNEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT FUND INC: $20,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetTHE BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT INC: $19,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetEDUCATE THE CHILDREN INC: $14,500 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetThe Mountain Institute Inc: $13,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHALLOCKVILLE INC: $3,625 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE HURRICANE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHOLD TOWN INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPECONIC BAYKEEPER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Community TrustNY15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Braatz Fund for Culture Community and Conservation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Braatz Fund for Culture Community and Conservation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Braatz Fund for Culture Community and Conservation?

Find your warmest path to Braatz Fund for Culture Community and Conservation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Braatz Fund for Culture Community and Conservation’s filings →

More from the funding graph