Skip to content
Boys & Girls Clubs in Indiana Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Boys & Girls Clubs in Indiana Inc

Mission and significant activities to promote exclusively the social welfare of boys and girls in indiana; to provide guidance and to promote the health, social, educational, vocational, character, and cultural development of boys and girls in indiana without regard to race, color, creed, or national origin; and to receive, invest, and…

$526k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$133k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Youth Development$2.7M
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $326k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $185k
$30,457
Median grant
1
States reached
$852k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF EVANSVILLE$133,371
WELLS COMMUNITY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS$51,371
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF MICHIGAN CITYLAPORTE COUNTY$49,991
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF MARSHALL COUNTY$47,925
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIANA$45,581
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF MORGAN COUNTY$41,716
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS HUNTINGTON$30,457
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF RUSH CO$24,245
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ST JOSEPHS$23,769
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NOBLESVILLE$23,116
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE CO$21,246
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF LYN TREECE$17,699
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SEYMOUR$8,749
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF TIPTON CO$5,638
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BGC OF PORTAGE: $13k → 10%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NOBLESVILLE: $23k → 5%BGC HARRISON CRAWFORD: $11k → 8%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIANA: $46k → 9%WELLS COMMUNITY BGC: $128k → 9%BGC OF MORGAN COUNTY: $79k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF TIPTON CO: $6k → 10%BGC OF MARSHALL COUNTY: $128k → 10%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SEYMOUR: $9k → 11%BGC OF FORT WAYNE: $6k → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF RUSH CO: $24k → 12%LAWRENCE COUNTY BGC: $251k → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS HUNTINGTON: $30k → 13%BGC OF ST JOSEPHS: $84k → 13%BGC OF MICHIGAN CITYLAPORTE COUNTY: $102k → 15%BGC OF EVANSVILLE: $154k → 15%INDIANA ALLIANCE OF BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS: $97k → 16%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE CO: $21k → 18%BGC OF LYN TREECE: $21k → 19%BGC OF GREATER NW INDIANA: $10k → 9%WELLS COMMUNITY BGC: $102k → 9%BGC OF MORGAN COUNTY: $43k → 9%BGC OF MARSHALL COUNTY: $118k → 10%BGC OF SEYMOUR: $7k → 11%BGC OF FORT WAYNE: $6k → 12%LAWRENCE COUNTY BGC: $229k → 12%BGC HUNTINGTON: $13k → 13%BGC OF ST JOSEPHS: $40k → 13%BGC OF MICHIGAN CITYLAPORTE COUNTY: $89k → 15%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF EVANSVILLE: $133k → 15%INDIANA ALLIANCE OF BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS: $16k → 16%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF LYN TREECE: $18k → 19%WELLS COMMUNITY BGC: $79k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF MORGAN COUNTY: $42k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF MARSHALL COUNTY: $48k → 10%BGC OF SEYMOUR: $5k → 11%LAWRENCE COUNTY BGC: $99k → 12%BGC HUNTINGTON: $12k → 13%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ST JOSEPHS: $24k → 13%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF MICHIGAN CITYLAPORTE COUNTY: $50k → 15%BGC OF EVANSVILLE: $88k → 15%BGC OF INDIANAPOLIS: $6k → 16%BGC OF LYN TREECE: $16k → 19%WELLS COMMUNITY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS: $51k → 9%BGC OF MORGAN COUNTY: $40k → 9%BGC OF MICHIGAN CITYLAPORTE COUNTY: $46k → 15%BGC OF EVANSVILLE: $55k → 15%BGC OF INDIANAPOLIS: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 15 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$2.6M
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+20%

Still filing today

93%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE CO
    3× · 2021–2023 · $579k · revenue +26%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $430k · revenue +113%
  • WC
    WELLS COMMUNITY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    4× · 2021–2024 · $360k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE
    one grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue -7%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF HARRISON COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys Girls Club
—
2
Boys and Girls Club of Augusta/Waynesboro

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
3
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Northwoods Inc

To empower all youth, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
4
Boys & Girls Club of the Missouri River Area

To enable all young people, especially those who need them most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
5
Boys and Girls Club of the Northern Cheyenne Nation

The boys & girls club's mission is to inspire and enable all youth of the northern cheyenne nation and surrounding areas to be productive citizens.

Youth Development
6
Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Peoria Inc

To enable young people, especially those who need us most to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
7
Boys & Girls Clubs of the San Gorgonio Pass

To inspire and enable all young people especially those in need to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Education
8
Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest Virginia Inc

To enable and inspire all young people, ages five to eighteen, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

Youth Development
9
Boys and Girls Clubs of West Central Missouri

The mission of the boys & girls clubs of west central missouri is to inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as caring and productive citizens.

Youth Development
10
Boys and Girls Club of Carroll County Inc

To inspire and enable all youth to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
11
Boys & Girls Club of Baldwin and Jones Co Inc

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

—
12
Boys and Girls Clubs of Cascade County

Enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Northwest Indiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boys & Girls Club of Morgan County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE CO: $578,671 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE COWELLS COMMUNITY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $360,002 · Youth DevelopmentWELLS COMMUNITY BOYS & GIRLS CLUBBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARSHALL COUNTY INC: $293,910 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARSHALL COUNTY INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC: $286,679 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INCBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC: $147,366 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC+8 more: $230,958 · Youth Development+8 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC: $429,932 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVAN…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA: $112,364 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AM…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE COUNTY: $26,440 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOBLESVILLE INC: $23,116 · Other+2 more: $32,649 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MORGAN COUNTY: $204,215 · Education
Youth Development$1,897,586Other$624,501Education$204,215

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE CO: $578,671 over 3y, 24% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC: $429,932 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetWELLS COMMUNITY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $360,002 over 4y, 22% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARSHALL COUNTY INC: $293,910 over 3y, 14% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC: $286,679 over 4y, 9.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MORGAN COUNTY: $204,215 over 4y, 16% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC: $147,366 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIANA INC: $55,871 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HUNTINGTON COUNTY INC: $55,274 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetLYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY: $53,976 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE COUNTY: $26,440 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RUSH CO INC: $24,245 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOBLESVILLE INC: $23,116 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SEYMOUR INC: $20,649 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE: $13,055 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF HARRISON COUNTY INC: $10,899 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPTON COUNTY: $5,638 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boys & Girls Clubs of…Boys & Girls Clubs of…Good360Indiana Youth Institu…Centerpoint Energy Fo…Boys and Girls Club o…The Blackbaud Giving …Lilly Endowment IncDollar General Litera…1st Source Bank Found…Nisource Charitable F…Duke Energy Foundation
Boys & Girls Clubs of AmericaGA39.8× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · Good360 · Indiana Youth Institute Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Boys and Girls Club of the Northern Indiana Corridor Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Lilly Endowment Inc · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Boys & Girls Clubs in Indiana Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Boys & Girls Clubs in Indiana Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Boys & Girls Clubs in Indiana’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home