· Public charity
Boys & Girls Clubs in Indiana Inc
Mission and significant activities to promote exclusively the social welfare of boys and girls in indiana; to provide guidance and to promote the health, social, educational, vocational, character, and cultural development of boys and girls in indiana without regard to race, color, creed, or national origin; and to receive, invest, and…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $326k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $185k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF EVANSVILLE | $133,371 |
| WELLS COMMUNITY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS | $51,371 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF MICHIGAN CITYLAPORTE COUNTY | $49,991 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF MARSHALL COUNTY | $47,925 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIANA | $45,581 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF MORGAN COUNTY | $41,716 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS HUNTINGTON | $30,457 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF RUSH CO | $24,245 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ST JOSEPHS | $23,769 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NOBLESVILLE | $23,116 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE CO | $21,246 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF LYN TREECE | $17,699 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SEYMOUR | $8,749 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF TIPTON CO | $5,638 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE CO3× · 2021–2023 · $579k · revenue +26%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC4× · 2021–2024 · $430k · revenue +113%
- WCWELLS COMMUNITY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB4× · 2021–2024 · $360k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGEone grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue -7%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF HARRISON COUNTY INCone grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.
To empower all youth, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.
To enable all young people, especially those who need them most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
The boys & girls club's mission is to inspire and enable all youth of the northern cheyenne nation and surrounding areas to be productive citizens.
To enable young people, especially those who need us most to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.
To inspire and enable all young people especially those in need to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.
To enable and inspire all young people, ages five to eighteen, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.
The mission of the boys & girls clubs of west central missouri is to inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as caring and productive citizens.
To inspire and enable all youth to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
Enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Northwest Indiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boys & Girls Club of Morgan County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE CO ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds WELLS COMMUNITY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARSHALL COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MORGAN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HUNTINGTON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds LYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RUSH CO INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOBLESVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SEYMOUR INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF HARRISON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPTON COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · Good360 · Indiana Youth Institute Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Boys and Girls Club of the Northern Indiana Corridor Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Lilly Endowment Inc · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Boys & Girls Clubs in Indiana Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.