Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bonbright Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Arts & Culture$55kHealth$54kEducation$44kRecreation & Sports$32kInternational$23kHuman Services$20kEnvironment$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$898k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL DANCE EDUCATION ORGANIZATION$13,750
ROWAN CABARRUS YMCA$11,250
COLLEGIATE SCHOOL$10,000
RINCON WATER SAFETY ORGANIZATION CORP$4,000
JESSE CLUMP MEMORIAL FUND$3,000
LOWER SHORE LAND TRUST$2,500
ROWAN CABARRUS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
VCU MASSEY COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER$2,225
INDIAN RIVER BAND BOOSTERS$1,000
DELMARVA PUBLIC MEDIA (SALISBURY UNIVERSITY)$750
GREATER RICHMOND SCAN$500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR ROCKBRIDGE BETH AND ALLEGHANY$500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF RICHMOND$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CANNON MEMORIAL YMCA: $1k → 8%ROWAN CABARRUS YMCA: $11k → 15%CAMERON K GALLAGHER FOUNDATION: $250 → 6%ROWAN-CABARRUS YMCA: $5k → 15%JESSE CLUMP MEMORIAL FUND: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
NY
MA
PA
CT
VA
MD
DE
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of Bonbright Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 27% of the giving stays in ME; read by stated purpose it is 31% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Bonbright Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$185k · 19 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
28

Total granted

$185k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+8%

Still filing today

68%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ND
    NATIONAL DANCE EDUCATION ORGANIZATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $46k · revenue +0%
  • TC
    THE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL
    3× · 2021–2025 · $21k · revenue +15%
  • RY
    ROWAN-CABARRUS YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2021–2025 · $17k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • AA
    ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • NM
    NAMI MAINE
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kennebunk Land Trust

Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.

Environment
2
The Great Pond Foundation Inc

Our mission is to cultivate the resilience of our coastal pond ecosystems through science, collaboration, and education.

Environment
3
Save the Bay Inc

Save the bay protects, restores, and improves the ecological health of the narragansett bay region, including its watershed and adjacent coastal waters, through an ecosystem-based approach to environmental action; defends the right of the…

Environment
4
Save Barnegat Bay Inc

Our mission is to restore and protect barnegat bay and its ecosystem. we advance our mission by being a strong and independent voice for the bay throughout the watershed, including all of ocean and part of monmouth counties. we do this…

Environment
5
Chebeague & Cumberland Land Trust

Our mission is to permanently conserve and steward natural resources across our island and mainland communities for the benefit of current and future generations.

6
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
7
Royal River Conservation Trust

The royal river conservation trust (rrct) is a regional land trust working primarily in seven maine municipalities. the trust owns,cares for, and stewards land and conservation easements to protect land and water resources for the general…

Environment
8
Saddle River Day School Inc

To inspire each child to achieve personal and academic excellence and to become a caring and ethical contributor to society.

9
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
10
Rhode Island Bankers Association Inc

The rhode island bankers association will serve as the sole rhode island based organization serving the banking industry and will advocate for its member institutions and participate alongside other new england banking industry…

Public Benefit
11
Stoneleigh-Burnham School

Stoneleigh-burnham school is an academic community that fosters an international perspective. we inspire girls to pursue meaningful lives based on honor, respect, and intellectual curiosity. each student is challenged to discover her best…

Education
12
Rhode Island Marine Trade Association

Rimta's mission is to champion the rhode island marine industry through advocacy, education, environmental stewardship, innovation and promotion.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sandy Hook Promise Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Rincon Water Safety Organization Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYmca Community CentersProfessional Ballet Compani…Independent K-8 SchoolsPublic University Foundatio…Pregnancy Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Public Library SupportLand Conservation Organizat…Volunteer Fire DepartmentsCancer Support OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionChristian Youth CampsFood Pantries & AssistanceYouth Sports Booster Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%29%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%37%20–35yr13%39%35–55yr16%11%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,533

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
20/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LENORE RHYNE UNIVERSITY — $14,250 · OtherLENORE RHYNE UNIVERSITYMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $10,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTER — $10,000 · OtherARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL CLINICAL RESEAR…NORTHERN LIGHTS BLUE HILL HOSPITAL — $10,000 · OtherNORTHERN LIGHTS BLUE HILL HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient — $7,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNOVA MIDDLE SCHOOL — $5,000 · OtherJOSHUA M FREEMAN ARTS FOUNDATION — $4,000 · OtherRINCON WATER SAFETY ORGANIZATION CORP — $4,000 · Other+29 more — $40,725 · Other+29 moreNATIONAL DANCE EDUCATION ORGANIZATION — $45,750 · EducationNATIONAL DANCE EDUCATION ORGANIZATIO…THE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL — $20,500 · EducationTHE COLLEGIATE SCHOOLSALISBURY SCHOOL INC — $9,500 · EducationSALISBURY SCHOOL INCVIRGINIA SQUASH RACQUETS ASSOCIATION INC — $5,750 · EducationVIRGINIA SQUASH RACQUETS ASSOCIATION…+2 more — $4,000 · EducationROWAN-CABARRUS YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $17,250 · Human ServicesJESSE KLUMP MEMORIAL FUND INC — $3,000 · Human Services+1 more — $250 · Human ServicesGLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC — $9,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC — $7,250 · Recreation & SportsCHARLOTTE SOCCER ACADEMY — $3,000 · Recreation & SportsSave The Children Federation Inc — $13,500 · InternationalBLUE HILL HERITAGE TRUST — $7,000 · EnvironmentLOWER SHORE LAND TRUST INC — $2,500 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR THE INLAND BAYS INC — $1,500 · EnvironmentAMIGOS DE TRES PALMAS INC — $1,000 · EnvironmentNAMI MAINE — $5,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $500 · Health
Other$105,725Education$85,500Human Services$20,500Recreation & Sports$19,250International$13,500Environment$12,000Health$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL DANCE EDUCATION ORGANIZATION — $45,750 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTHE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL — $20,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROWAN-CABARRUS YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $17,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $13,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSALISBURY SCHOOL INC — $9,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC — $7,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE HILL HERITAGE TRUST — $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVIRGINIA SQUASH RACQUETS ASSOCIATION INC — $5,750 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetNAMI MAINE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRINCON WATER SAFETY ORGANIZATION CORP — $4,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPENINSULA AMBULANCE CORPS — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLOTTE SOCCER ACADEMY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER RICHMOND SCAN - STOP CHILD ABUSE NOW INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE HILL PUBLIC LIBRARY — $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROWAN-CABARRUS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARKS OF HOPE A NJ NONPROFIT CORP — $1,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCENTER FOR THE INLAND BAYS INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUP RVA — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRANDYWINE VALLEY SPCA — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Foundation for RockbridgeBath & Allegh — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMIGOS DE TRES PALMAS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 68% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEDGWICK-BROOKLIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Cameron K Gallagher Foundation — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Estes Foundation Co Matthew Breidenbach Pitcairn · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Carmax Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bonbright Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 26%
  • Center for the Inland Bays Inc59% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc26% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation0% of income from government
  • National Dance Education Organization0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph