· Private foundation
Bollinger Foundation Inc
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k16 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $71k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REAL LOVE MINISTRIES | $35,500 |
| BATON BAPTIST CHURCH | $23,937 |
| SAMARITANS PURSE | $11,500 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $1,500 |
| THE JIMMY V FOUNDATION FOR CANCER R | $1,000 |
| CALDWELL PREGNANCY CENTER | $1,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $1,000 |
| CALDWELL COUNTY SMART START | $1,000 |
| SHELTER HOME OF CALDWELL COUNTY | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| ROBINS NEST | $1,000 |
| ST JUDES | $500 |
| FOCUS ON THE FAMILY | $500 |
| HELPING HANDS | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2022, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSE5× · 2018–2022 · $18k · revenue +163%
- HSHART SQUARE FOUNDATION INC2× · 2018–2020 · $10k · revenue +2%
- SHSHELTER HOME OF THE FOOTHILLS INC4× · 2018–2022 · $5k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- DMDUNKLIN MEMORIAL CHURCH INCone grant, 2017 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $3k
- HHHELPING HANDS CLINIC INCone grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide safe, effective, compassionate care and to promote healthy lifestyles to our community.
To build affordable housing for disadvantaged families in caldwell county.
The victory television network (vtn) is a network of full-powered, commerical tv stations in arkansas, including kvtn-dt in little rock/pinebluff, kvth-dt in hot springs and kvtj-dt in jonesboro. founded by pastors h. l. and jeanne…
Seeking to put god's love into action, central valley habitat for humanity, inc. brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.
Putting Gods love into action by bringing people together to build homes to realize our vision where everyone has a decent place to live. Habitat (local affiliate) adheres to a strict non-proselytizing policy.
Health and human services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shelter Home of the Foothills Inc and the most unlike its peers is Caldwell County Dialysis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds HART SQUARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SHELTER HOME OF THE FOOTHILLS INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds CALDWELL PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING HANDS CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds Henderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity ↗
- Who funds FOOTHILLS SERVICE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Caldwell County Yokefellow Inc ↗
- Who funds CALDWELL COUNTY DIALYSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CALDWELL HERITAGE MUSEUMINC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Bernhardt Furniture Foundation · Broyhill Family Foundation Inc · Hogan Family Foundation Inc · The Coffey Foundation Inc · Stevens Family Foundation Inc · The Wilson Family Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bollinger Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.