· Private foundation
Bohnert Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $22k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $117k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $66,800 |
| SPECIAL OPERATIONS FUND | $50,000 |
| OUTLYR LLC | $8,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| COLUMBUS CITIZENS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| TUIITION SUPPORT FUND | $3,000 |
| GUARDIAN REVIVAL | $880 |
| THE KEYS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +84% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SOSpecial Operations Fund2× · 2023–2024 · $125k · revenue +55%
- ESEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2022 · $37k · revenue +56%
- USUDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC2× · 2019–2022 · $25k · revenue +219%
Funded once
Cornell Universitygraduatedone grant, 2017 · $350k · revenue +59%- AEAMERICAN EXPRESS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $24k · revenue -97%
- MHMORRISTOWN HOSPITALone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The fund is formed to provide scholarships to individuals for higher forms of education, such as college, graduate school or vocational schools.
Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…
The ucf foundation encourages, stewards and celebrates charitable contributions from alumni and friends to support university of central florida (ucf).
Provide donations to organizations that are charitable and/or educational: see sch o. meet the specifications of irc 501 (c) (3) ; and promote the furtherance of golf through providing scholarships to caddies and others worthy of support…
Arcs foundation advances science and technology in the united states by providing financial awards to academically outstanding u.s. citizens studying to complete degrees in science, engineering and medical research.
The dolphin scholarship foundation (dsf) believes that enhancement of both human potential and quality of life is achievable through education. many sons, daughters, and spouses of u.s. navy submariners face financial obstacles while…
The service academies golf foundation, inc. fosters the academic and athletic development of members of the golf programs at the united states military service academies and military benefit organizations through funds provided by the…
The foundation advances science and technology in the united states by providing financial awards to academically outstanding u.s. citizens studying to complete doctoral degrees in science, engineering and medical research.
The carolinas golf foundation was formed by the carolinas golf association in 1977 to provide scholarships and funding for a variety of carolinas-based golf initiatives.
The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…
Provide educational scholarships based on need or merit.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Columbus Citizens Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Express Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds Special Operations Fund ↗
- Who funds COLUMBUS CITIZENS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN EXPRESS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DESALES UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE ALEXANDRA ROSE TOZZI MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds TUITION SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GUARDIAN REVIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds American Junior Golf Association Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The John H and Katherine J Weiland Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bohnert Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Bohnert Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Bohnert Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.