Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bohnen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$191kHealth$46kHousing & Shelter$45kFood & Nutrition$32kReligion$10kAnimals$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$603k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION$10,000
SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES$10,000
CARE AND SHARE FOOD BANK OF SOUTHERN CO$7,500
PIKES PEAK HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
WESTSIDE CARES$5,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL CO$5,000
THE PLACE$5,000
DISABILITY SERVICES OF CO$5,000
MT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICES$5,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION$2,500
SALVATION ARMY COLORADO SPRINGS$2,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$2,500
SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION$2,500
FOUNTAIN VALLEY SENIOR CENTER$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $116k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%THE PLACE: $10k → 9%FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $9k → 9%FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $8k → 9%FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%THE PLACE: $5k → 9%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 9%SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES: $10k → 9%SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES: $10k → 9%SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 9%SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 9%SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 9%SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES: $3k → 9%SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$317k · 13 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$317k
$4k

Still filing today

46%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $59k · revenue +112%
  • SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +110%
  • WC
    WESTSIDE CARES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $30k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • SH
    SACRED HEART FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
2
Fort Collins Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love into action; habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. fort collins habitat for humanity adheres…

Housing & Shelter
3
Pathways Hospice

Honoring every moment of life, pathways hospice provides compassionate, excellent, comprehensive care for those who have an advanced medical condition and those who are grieving.

Human Services
4
Housing Solutions for the Southwest

The mission of housing solutions for the southwest is to lead the way providing help, hope, and a seamless system of affordable housing services to our communities in southwest colorado.

Housing & Shelter
5
Pikes Peak Hospice and Palliative Care Inc

The mission of pikes peak hospice & palliative care is to provide compassionate and expert end-of-life care to patients and their families, partner with those who share our vision, and lead change in the community to ensure comfort for all…

—
6
Catholic Charities & Community Serv of the Archdiocese of Denver

As the charitable arm of the archdiocese of denver and inspired by god's love and compassion, catholic charities extends the healing ministry of jesus christ to the poor and those in need. catholic charities of the archdiocese of denver…

Human Services
7
Set of Colorado Springs

S.e.t. of colorado springs is made up of a small multi-skilled staff and a large corps of volunteers, including many in the medical professions. s.e.t. of colorado springs collaborates with other care-givers in the pikes peak area to teach…

—
8
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
9
Hospice of Metro Denver Inc

To encircle those facing advanced illness with unprecedented levels of comfort, compassion, and expertise.

Human Services
10
Sunshine Home Share Colorado

Sunshine home share colorado ensures quality of life for older adults and strengthens communities through a safe home-sharing model, supportive economic empowerment, and connections to resources and services.

Housing & Shelter
11
Second Chance Center Inc

Our goal is to help formerly incarcerated people transition to lives of success and fulfillment. We provide the formerly incarcerated, and their network, with education, resources, and support to successfully re-enter the community and…

Human Services
12
Humane Society of the South Platte Valley Inc

HSSPV's mission is to be a leader in saving lives and serving communities by providing innovative care for animals, finding loving homes and reuniting families.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Springs Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Fostering Hope Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTSIDE CARES INC: $30,000 · OtherWESTSIDE CARES INCPIKES PEAK HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $30,000 · OtherPIKES PEAK HABITAT FOR HUMANITYCARE AND SHARE FOOD BANK OF SOUTHERN CO: $30,000 · OtherCARE AND SHARE FOOD BANK OF SOUTHERN COCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL COLORADO INC: $30,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL COLORADO INCDISABILITY SERVICES OF CO: $21,000 · OtherDISABILITY SERVICES OF COMT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICES: $15,000 · OtherMT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICESSALVATION ARMY COLORADO SPRINGS: $12,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMY COLORADO SPRINGSDISABILITY SERVICES OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $10,250 · OtherOUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $6,000 · OtherFOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $58,500 · Human ServicesFOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATIONSILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesSILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INCThe Place: $15,000 · Human ServicesThe Place+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $15,000 · HealthHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $2,500 · Animals
Other$194,750Human Services$116,000Health$15,000Animals$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $58,500 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetSILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $40,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWESTSIDE CARES INC: $30,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetPIKES PEAK HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $30,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Place: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $15,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds PIKES PEAK HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds The Place ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pikes Peak United WayCO20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pikes Peak United Way · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Myron Stratton Home · Ent Credit Union · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · The Marson Foundation · Mabel Horrigan Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bohnen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bohnen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bohnen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph