Skip to content
Bohannon Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Bohannon Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$464kEducation$268kYouth Development$172kHousing & Shelter$163kHealth$129kEnvironment$61kCommunity Improvement$38kCrime & Legal$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA$10,000
REBUILDING TOGETHER PENINSULA$10,000
ST FRANCIS CENTER$5,000
SAN MATEO POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE$5,000
LIFEMOVES$5,000
SAN MATEO COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION$2,500
SAN MATEO POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE$2,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD - MAR MONTE$2,500
SUSTAINABLE SAN MATEO COUNTY$2,500
CAMINAR FOR MENTAL HEALTH$2,500
PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS$2,500
KIWANIS CLUB OF WOODSIDE TERRACE AM$2,000
ROTARY CLUB OF MENLO PARK FOUNDATION$2,000
ARAGON HIGH SCHOOL$1,250
SERVICE LEAGUE OF SAN MATEO COUNTY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 10%PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $25k → 7%PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $12k → 7%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $3k → 7%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $3k → 7%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $3k → 7%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $1k → 7%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $1k → 7%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $1k → 7%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $3k → 7%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $3k → 7%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $3k → 7%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$905k · 42 repeat orgs$441k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
48

Total granted

$905k
$433k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+16%

Still filing today

69%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SAMARITAN HOUSE
    3× · 2020–2023 · $228k · revenue +50%
  • SM
    San Mateo Police Activities League Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $140k · revenue +8%
  • TP
    THE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAM
    2× · 2020–2021 · $75k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • KA
    Kids & Art Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +16%
  • CO
    Children of Shelters
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -23%
  • PC
    PIVOTAL CONNECTIONSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +58%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Parents for Public Schools of San Francisco

PPS-SF's mission is to promote the fundamental value of public education and pursue the success of every public school by sharing knowledge, bridging communities, and informing policy.

—
2
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
4
Silicon Valley Education Foundation

Who we are - silicon valley education foundation (svef) focuses on raising student performance in the critical areas of math and science across all 33 santa clara county school districts, and also adjoining san mateo and alameda counties.…

Community Improvement
5
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Mario Pedrozzi Scholarship Foundation
Education
7
San Mateo Parents Nursery School

San mateo parents nursery school is a diverse community dedicated to fostering the learning and growth of children and adults. its goal is to create a loving, suppportive, empowering environment for children and their families.

—
8
Transportation Alternatives for Marin
Public Benefit
9
Santa Clara City Library Foundation and Friends

Santa Clara City Library Foundation and Friends is a nonprofit organization formed to enrich the local community by providing the Santa Clara City Library with funding and advocacy to enhance its facilities, programs, and services.

Education
10
Marcella Foundation
Philanthropy
11
San Francisco High School of the Arts

San Francisco Arts and Science Academy (ASA) provides TK5 grade students with a strong foundation in the arts, language, math, and science, fostering creativity, curiosity, and character development. Our bilingual, hands-on curriculum…

Education
12
Friends of the Children - San Francisco Bay Area

Impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Children's Services; the most unlike its peers is League to Save Lake Tahoe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/52
Grantees still filing
40/52
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAMARITAN HOUSE: $227,500 · OtherSAMARITAN HOUSEChildren of Shelters: $100,000 · OtherChildren of SheltersHIP HOUSINGHUMAN INVESTMENT PROJECT: $78,000 · OtherHIP HOUSINGHUMAN INVESTMENT PROJECTTHE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAM: $75,000 · OtherTHE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAMPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS: $75,000 · OtherPIVOTAL CONNECTIONSSt Francis Center: $55,000 · OtherSt Francis CenterSAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY ED FOUND: $35,000 · OtherLIFEMOVES: $30,000 · OtherHILLSDALE HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Other+71 more: $142,600 · Other+71 moreSan Mateo Police Activities League Inc: $140,050 · Youth DevelopmentSan Mateo Poli…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS C…+1 more: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentKids & Art Foundation: $100,000 · HealthKids & Art…PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $13,000 · HealthPLANNED PA…SEQUOIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Health+3 more: $5,000 · HealthPENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $37,000 · Human ServicesPENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $10,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $10,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5,000 · Human ServicesGRASSROOTS ECOLOGY: $50,000 · EnvironmentSustainable San Mateo County: $10,000 · EnvironmentRebuilding Together Peninsula: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterMONTERRA COMMUNITY FUND: $30,000 · Community ImprovementROTARY CLUB OF MENLO PARK FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Community Improvement
Other$848,100Youth Development$171,050Health$123,000Human Services$62,500Environment$60,000Housing & Shelter$50,000Community Improvement$38,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE: $227,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSan Mateo Police Activities League Inc: $140,050 over 5y, 11% of budgetKids & Art Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetChildren of Shelters: $100,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetTHE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAM: $75,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS: $75,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSt Francis Center: $55,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetRebuilding Together Peninsula: $50,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGRASSROOTS ECOLOGY: $50,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetPENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $37,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMONTERRA COMMUNITY FUND: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMENLO PARK-ATHERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSan Mateo Public Library Foundation: $20,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $10,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSustainable San Mateo County: $10,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetJOBTRAIN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF MENLO PARK FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSAN MATEO COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEQUOIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetService League of San Mateo County DBA Hope House: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA FAMILY FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAWN REDWOODS CHARITABLE TRUST: $4,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJack McGovern Coats Disease Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PALO ALTO JUNIOR MUSEUM & ZOO: $2,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN YOUTH SOCCER ORGANIZATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASA of San Mateo County: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN JOSE MUSEUM OF ART ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS FOR YOUTH INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBRING ME A BOOK FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSilicon Valley Bicycle Coalition: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA CONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIA HEART PROJECT: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF FOSTER CITY FOUNDATION: $425 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ODYSSEY SCHOOL: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHY CITIES TUTORING INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJSC SOCCER CLUB: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS TEACHERS & STUDENTS INC: $150 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Atkinson FoundationThe David and Lucile …The Palo Alto Communi…Danford FoundationLos Altos Mountain Vi…Bothin FoundationSand Hill FoundationGordon E and Betty I …Jewish Community Fede…Community Foundation …The San Bruno Communi…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA36.3× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Atkinson Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Palo Alto Community Fund · Danford Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Bothin Foundation · Sand Hill Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Community Foundation of San Carlos · The San Bruno Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bohannon Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bohannon Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 98 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bohannon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home