Skip to content
Boeing Company Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Boeing Company Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$3.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$7.4MScience & Tech$4.1MInternational$3.9MPhilanthropy$3.0MPublic Benefit$2.7MHealth$2.5MEducation$2.0MFood & Nutrition$1.7MOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $700k
  • $250k+4 grants · $4.3M
$100,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$104M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION$3,100,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS KENTUCKY REGION$700,000
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$300,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY$250,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$200,000
THE SALVATION ARMY - MIDLAND DIVISION$100,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL$100,000
LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTAMENT FOUNDATION$100,000
THE SALVATION ARMY METROPOLITAN AREA$100,000
URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN$100,000
GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FDN$30,000
WICHITA FOUNDATION$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $4.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS KENTUCKY REGION: $700k → 15%PRECINT2GETHER INC: $50k → 16%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $1.6M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $1.0M → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $700k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $550k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
OR
NJ
CT
CA
MO
KY
VA
AZ
NM
KS
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.4M · 6 repeat orgs$17M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
32

Total granted

$9.4M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
0%

Still filing today

83%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2020–2025 · $4.6M · revenue +38%
  • AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $950k · revenue +50%
  • Feeding America
    3× · 2021–2023 · $800k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • SC
    SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2.5M · revenue +78%
  • WS
    WASHINGTON STATE
    one grant, 2021 · $2.5M
  • THE WASHINGTON STEM CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $2.0M · revenue -54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
3
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
4
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
5
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

—
6
California Association of Food Banks

California association of food banks (cafb) is a non-profit public benefit corporation located in oakland, california. together with its 41-member foodbanks, cafb is the largest charitable hunger-relief and anti-hunger leader in the state.…

Food & Nutrition
7
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
8
Community Food Bank of New Jersey Inc

We serve as a champion for addressing the root causes of hunger, delivering neighbor-centric solutions, and fostering collaborative partnerships across all sectors of society for New Jersey.

Food & Nutrition
9
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
10
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research

Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.

Food & Nutrition
11
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
12
Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank

The jacobs & cushman san diego food bank is the largest hunger-relief organization in san diego county. its mission is to provide nutritious food to people in need, advocate for the hungry, and educate the public about hunger-related…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Cerdas Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/45
Grantees still filing
18/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHINGTON STATE: $2,500,000 · OtherWASHINGTON STATEAMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS-HARVEY: $1,605,000 · OtherAMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS-HARVEYIndividual grant recipient: $1,000,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND: $500,000 · OtherFLORIDA DISASTER FUND: $500,000 · OtherFeeding America: $800,000 · OtherFeeding America+24 more: $2,475,000 · Other+24 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,583,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National…+1 more: $50,000 · Human ServicesCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $1,350,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR…AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $950,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUN…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $500,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIEND…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC: $500,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIEND…BRAZIL FOUNDATION: $200,000 · International+5 more: $473,728 · International+5 moreCALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $3,100,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA …THE WASHINGTON STEM CENTER: $2,000,000 · EducationTHE WASHING…AIAA FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · EducationAIAA FOUNDA…THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND: $1,500,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BLACKB…CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $300,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA…NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250,000 · PhilanthropyNORTH CARO…Community Foundation of Snohomish County: $250,000 · PhilanthropyCommunity …HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COM…THE GREATER NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHSHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $70,000 · PhilanthropySEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $2,500,000 · HealthSEATTLE C…
Other$9,380,000Human Services$4,633,000International$3,973,728Arts & Culture$3,100,000Education$3,000,000Philanthropy$2,820,000Health$2,500,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,583,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $3,100,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $2,500,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WASHINGTON STEM CENTER: $2,000,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND: $1,500,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $1,350,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAIAA FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $950,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $800,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $500,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC: $500,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJobs for America's Graduates Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRAZIL FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTSCRA DISASTER RELIEF FUND: $175,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetCombined Arms: $125,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCERDAS FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE GREATER NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBayou Community Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNORTHSHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Food Bank: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF SOUTH JERSEY INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank: $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SALVATION ARMY WORLD SERVICE OFFICE: $73,728 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRECINCT2GETHER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…ImpactassetsincShell USA Company Fou…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Vanguard Charitable E…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA12.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Boeing Company Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Boeing Company Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Food Bank of South Jersey Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Boeing Company’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home