Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Boehm Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$138kEducation$79kRecreation & Sports$53kArts & Culture$51kInternational$40kHealth$28kPublic Benefit$27kPhilanthropy$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTERS$20,000
FERGUSON LIBRARY$10,000
AVON THEATRE FILM CENTER$5,500
BUILDING ONE COMMUNITY$5,000
CMPS$4,000
CHOOSE LOVE$3,000
SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES$2,000
STORAHTELLING LABSHUL$2,000
MUSEUM OF ARTS & DESIGN$1,500
FAIRGATE FARM$1,000
UROLOGY CARE FOUNDATION$1,000
COVE ISLAND WILDLIFE SANCTUARY$1,000
MACULA FOUNDATION$1,000
PARK AVENUE ARMORY$1,000
PACIFIC HOUSE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Gideons Promise: $500 → 13%Building One Community Corp: $25k → 9%Childcare Learning Centers: $20k → 9%Childcare Learning Centers: $15k → 9%BUILDING ONE COMMUNITY: $10k → 9%Childcare Learning Centers: $10k → 9%Childcare Learning Centers: $10k → 9%Childcare Learning Centers: $8k → 9%Childcare Learning Centers: $8k → 9%Building One Community Corp: $8k → 9%Building One Community Corp: $5k → 9%BUILDING ONE COMMUNITY: $5k → 9%Building One Community: $4k → 9%Building One Community Corp: $4k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
MN
WI
NY
MA
OH
CT
CA
NE
MD
HI
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$436k · 38 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
25

Total granted

$436k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+31%

Still filing today

66%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERS OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $71k · revenue +22%
  • BO
    BUILDING ONE COMMUNITY CORP
    7× · 2018–2025 · $60k · revenue +296%
  • MR
    MILL RIVER COLLABORATIVE INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $39k · revenue +216%

Funded once

  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • TC
    THE CLEAR FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +31%
  • PE
    Pure Earth FKA Blacksmith Institute Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Children's Learning Centers of Amarillo Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic Library OperationsJewish Community Organizati…Christian Youth CampsLocal History MuseumsPolicy Research and AdvocacyAffordable Housing Developm…Environmental Conservation …Food Banks and PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsCancer Support ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%3%<5yr15%8%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr18%25%20–35yr11%28%35–55yr13%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%3%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr18%26%20–35yr11%14%35–55yr13%30%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/48
the rest of the field
14%
12,027/86,660

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/45
Grantees still filing
31/45
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERS OF AMARILLO INC — $30,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERS OF AMARILLO INCNEW YORK PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP INC — $15,000 · OtherNEW YORK PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP INCFriends of Zuckerman Institute Fund — $13,500 · OtherFriends of Zuckerman Institute FundCMPS — $12,000 · OtherCMPSNorth Country Foundation — $11,000 · OtherNorth Country FoundationYALE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · OtherCHOOSE LOVE — $9,000 · OtherPark Avenue Armory — $9,000 · OtherPure Earth FKA Blacksmith Institute Inc — $7,500 · OtherCyclic Vomiting Associates — $7,500 · OtherCove Island Bird Sanctuary — $7,000 · OtherTHE MACULA FOUNDATION INC — $9,500 · Other+29 more — $58,400 · Other+29 moreCHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERS OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC — $70,900 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERS OF …BUILDING ONE COMMUNITY CORP — $59,500 · Human ServicesBUILDING ONE COMMUNITY CORPSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $5,000 · Human Services+2 more — $3,000 · Human ServicesMILL RIVER COLLABORATIVE INC — $39,000 · Recreation & SportsMILL RIVE…NORTH COUNTRY CAMPS FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE FERGUSON LIBRARY — $35,000 · EducationVILLAGE COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $1,500 · EducationAVON THEATRE FILM CENTER INC — $16,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN — $12,500 · Arts & CultureRETHINK THE CONVERSATION LTD — $4,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $3,160 · Arts & CultureAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 · InternationalHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC — $11,000 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INC — $2,000 · International+1 more — $1,000 · InternationalTHE CLEAR FUND — $7,500 · PhilanthropyFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyFAIRFIELD COUNTY'S COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$199,400Human Services$138,400Recreation & Sports$41,000Education$36,500Arts & Culture$35,660International$32,000Philanthropy$18,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERS OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC — $70,900 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBUILDING ONE COMMUNITY CORP — $59,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetMILL RIVER COLLABORATIVE INC — $39,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FERGUSON LIBRARY — $35,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERS OF AMARILLO INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAVON THEATRE FILM CENTER INC — $16,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN — $12,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MACULA FOUNDATION INC — $9,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRFIELD COUNTY'S COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUROLOGY CARE FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTORAHTELLING LAB SHUL INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRETHINK THE CONVERSATION LTD — $4,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC HOUSE INC — $3,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH GEN INC — $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Carnegie Hall Society Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFUTURE 5 INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY CAMPS FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTAMFORD LAND CONSERVATION TRUST INC — $1,900 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetVILLAGE COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUNDWATERS INC — $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $960 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStamford Museum & Nature Center Inc — $950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CRAFT COUNCIL — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIDEONS PROMISE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR MODERN PSYCHOANALYTIC STUDIES — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLAL-THE NATIONAL JEWISH CENTER FOR LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRUCE MUSEUM INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERS OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC
  • Who funds BUILDING ONE COMMUNITY CORP
  • Who funds MILL RIVER COLLABORATIVE INC
  • Who funds THE FERGUSON LIBRARY
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERS OF AMARILLO INC
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds AVON THEATRE FILM CENTER INC
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP INC
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN
  • Who funds HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC
  • Who funds THE MACULA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE CLEAR FUND
  • Who funds SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC
  • Who funds FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC
  • Who funds FAIRFIELD COUNTY'S COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds UROLOGY CARE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds STORAHTELLING LAB SHUL INC
  • Who funds RETHINK THE CONVERSATION LTD
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PACIFIC HOUSE INC
  • Who funds JEWISH GEN INC
  • Who funds The Carnegie Hall Society Inc
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC
  • Who funds MYRIAD USA INC
  • Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC
  • Who funds FUTURE 5 INC
  • Who funds NORTH COUNTRY CAMPS FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Selkowitz Family FoundationCT20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Selkowitz Family Foundation · Rich Foundation Inc · Stamford Rotary Trust Fund · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Claire L Helsing Foundation · Simmons Family Foundation Inc · The Pitney Bowes Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Herbert & Nell Singer Foundation Inc · Garden Homes Fund · Alexander Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Boehm Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 36%
  • Mill River Collaborative Inc100% of income from government
  • Stamford Land Conservation Trust Inc68% of income from government
  • Pacific House Inc46% of income from government
  • Children's Learning Centers of Fairfield County Inc36% of income from government
  • Stamford Museum & Nature Center Inc9% of income from government
  • Soundwaters Inc4% of income from government
  • Bruce Museum Inc0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph