· Private foundation
Boeckmann Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k30 grants · $55k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KING'S UNIVERSITY | $100,000 |
| VIDA CHURCH | $100,000 |
| HERITAGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| FREEDOM CHURCH | $50,000 |
| SAFE HAVEN RESOURCES | $25,000 |
| SHRINERS CHILDREN'S ST LOUIS | $10,000 |
| CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL | $5,000 |
| PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY | $4,000 |
| GLENDALE ADVENTIST ACADEMY | $4,000 |
| THE MASTERS UNIVERSITY INC | $4,000 |
| BETHANY BIBLE CHURCH | $3,000 |
| LOS ANGELES POLICE RESERVE FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| SAFE PASSAGES | $2,500 |
| CHURCH OF THE LIVING WORD OF GOD | $2,000 |
| HOPE THE MISSION | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
63 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HAHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC2× · 2019–2021 · $50k · revenue +2%
- HTHOPE THE MISSION6× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue ×16
- PUPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY6× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- SCSTRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS GROUPone grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue -41%
- PBPebble Beach Company Foundationone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -24%
- CPCOMMUNITY PARTNERSgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +266%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The los angeles mission breaks the cycle of homelessness and poverty, by stabilizing people in a safe and spiritual environment, connecting them to solutions and walking with them on their journey.
None
The mission of the Los Angeles Bible Training School is to come alongside of local churches to train the people of God in a systematic study of the word of God to do the work of God to the glory of God.
His university provides graduate and undergraduate degree and diploma education and training for his family ministry specialists who desire to pursue careers in counseling and ministry.
The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…
Presbyterian theological seminary in america exists to servce the korean presbyterian church abroad (kpca) and the kingdom of god by equipping students for effective service to god, his church, and the world he sends us to evangelize.
Spread the good news of jesus christ to the homeless of the skid row in los angeles.
church praised the word
Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth With a Mission - San Diegobaja and the most unlike its peers is Global Mobility. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 239 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS GROUP ↗
- Who funds HORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE THE MISSION ↗
- Who funds PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds The Adult Skills Center ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Safe Haven Resources ↗
- Who funds Pebble Beach Company Foundation ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds THE HEART FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Master's University and Seminary ↗
- Who funds CAPITOL MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ELNET ↗
- Who funds TIKVAH-ETTA AND LAZEAR ISRAEL CENTER FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED ↗
- Who funds ZOE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds OASIS OF HOLLYWOOD ↗
- Who funds COYOTE CLUB ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Weingart Foundation · Food Forward Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Proverbs 39 Foundation · California Community Foundation · Lon V Smith Foundation · Christian Foundation of America DBA Christian Foundation of The West · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Orange County Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Lawrence P Frank Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Boeckmann Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.