Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bob Richardson Memorial Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$183k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.2MScience & Tech$4kEmployment$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $173k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE$43,333
WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY$26,388
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$23,333
LINN BENTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE$20,000
PACIFIC UNIVERSITY$10,000
LANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$10,000
DELTA STATE COLLEGE$10,000
TREASURE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$10,000
LINFIELD UNIVERSITY$10,000
PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON$6,666
INDEPENDENT ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS$3,333
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SPIRE TECHNOLOGIES INC: $2k → 10%EASTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%NORTHWEST LINE: $5k → 9%SPIRE TECHNOLOGIES INC: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
OR
PA
RI
CA
UT
MO
VA
AZ
MS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 19 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
15

Total granted

$1.2M
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+11%

Still filing today

16%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    SOUTHERN VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2021–2023 · $44k · revenue +30%
  • LU
    Linfield University
    3× · 2023–2025 · $29k · revenue +5%
  • PU
    PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • OI
    OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • DU
    Drury University
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
9
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
10
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
11
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
12
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Baptist University; the most unlike its peers is Independent Electrical Contractors of Oregon Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $432,941 · OtherOREGON COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGEOREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $231,007 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYWESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $140,813 · OtherWESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITYLinn-Benton Community College: $76,026 · OtherLinn-Benton Community College+27 more: $258,871 · Other+27 moreSOUTHERN VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $43,846 · EducationSOUTHERN …Linfield University: $29,200 · EducationLinfield …PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationPACIFIC U…Drury University: $3,650 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $3,600 · Education+1 more: $1,800 · EducationBROWN UNIVERSITY: $3,600 · Community Improvement
Other$1,139,658Education$102,096Community Improvement$3,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHERN VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $43,846 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLinfield University: $29,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDrury University: $3,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHERN VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Linfield University ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Drury University ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS OF OREGON INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Al & Ib Thomas Ed'L FdWI16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Al & Ib Thomas Ed'L Fd · Joann Hamilton Memorial Fund · Wayne C Stewart Foundation Uma · Eminger Stewart Foundation Uma · Leo Adler Trust · West Scholarship Fnd · Amy Heryford Ousley and James Heryford Ousley · Jefferson Scholarship Fund · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bob Richardson Memorial Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bob Richardson Memorial Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Linfield University: 4% of income from government
  • Pacific University: 2% of income from government
  • University of Portland: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bob Richardson Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph