Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bob & Nita Hirsch Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$3.3MHealth$2.1MArts & Culture$1.6MRecreation & Sports$1.1MYouth Development$1.0MReligion$733kEducation$641kInternational$401kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $137k
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.0M
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROVIDENCE CEDARS TARZANA FOUNDATION$1,700,000
LULU'S PLACE$1,000,000
LA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT COMMISSION$305,000
CONCERN FOUNDATION$82,100
HAROLD & CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION$55,000
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$30,000
ALZHEIMER'S GREATER LOS ANGELES$26,000
BEIT T'SHUVAH$23,000
TENNIS HALL OF FAME$20,000
LA JEWISH HEALTH$20,000
ANGEL CITY SPORTS$15,000
DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL$11,160
THE LADYLIKE FOUNDATION$10,000
ENDLESS SPORTS$7,500
CITY OF HOPE$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GOLDEN HEART RANCH: $10k → 14%GOLDEN HEART RANCH: $10k → 14%GOLDEN HEART RANCH: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%ANGEL CITY SPORTS: $15k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%Los Angeles Police Foundation: $10k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NJ
RI
CA
NC
DC
HI
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 99% of Bob & Nita Hirsch Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 1% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Bob & Nita Hirsch Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.9M · 44 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

44 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
48

Total granted

$8.9M
$835k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+27%

Still filing today

50%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER
    6× · 2017–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +26%
  • AG
    ALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $584k · revenue +28%
  • DT
    DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL
    6× · 2017–2024 · $433k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • H8
    HILLEL 818
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +22% · 35% of their budget
  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +8%
  • MAUI FOOD BANK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +138%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
2
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
3
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

4
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

5
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

6
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
7
Clal-the National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership Inc

A leading advocate for pluralism and diversity, clal offers jewish wisdom that enhances public life, deepens civic engagement and cultivates personal growth.

Religion
8
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

9
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
10
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
11
Jewish Communal Fund

To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.

Philanthropy
12
The Jewish Community Center in Manhattan Inc

Together with our community, jcc manhattan creates opportunities for people to connect, grow, and learn within an ever-changing jewish landscape.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is Jewish Life Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFamily Philanthropic Founda…Arts & Culture OrganizationsYouth Education and Develop…Charter School OperatorsHealthcare Providers and Me…Jewish Community Organizati…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr16%6%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr17%30%20–35yr10%11%35–55yr12%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr16%16%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr17%43%20–35yr10%10%35–55yr12%17%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/57
the rest of the field
16%
7,867/49,759

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 103 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/48
Grantees still filing
34/48
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PROVIDENCE CEDARS TARZANA FOUNDATION — $2,481,600 · OtherPROVIDENCE CEDARS TARZANA FOUNDATIONLA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT COMMISSION — $1,070,000 · OtherLA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT COMMISSIONTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $350,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONHAMAKOM — $328,598 · OtherHILLEL 818 — $250,000 · Other+69 more — $2,014,520 · Other+69 moreSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER — $1,399,999 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL CULTU…LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $69,258 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $37,200 · Arts & CultureLULU'S PLACE INC — $1,000,000 · Recreation & SportsLULU'S PL…ALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES — $583,500 · HealthALZHEIMER…PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA — $275,000 · HealthPROVIDENC…THE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION) — $85,000 · HealthTHE HAROL…+5 more — $43,591 · HealthCONCERN FOUNDATION — $423,600 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $200,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $50,000 · PhilanthropyKIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC — $210,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $175,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $150,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $25,000 · International+4 more — $28,500 · InternationalDE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL — $432,760 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION — $60,400 · EducationAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY — $25,000 · Education+1 more — $5,000 · Education
Other$6,494,718Arts & Culture$1,506,457Recreation & Sports$1,000,000Health$987,091Philanthropy$673,600International$588,500Education$523,160

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER — $1,399,999 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetLULU'S PLACE INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES — $583,500 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetDE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL — $432,760 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION — $423,600 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $350,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA — $275,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHILLEL 818 — $250,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetKIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC — $210,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $175,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION) — $85,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah — $74,800 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $69,258 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC — $67,800 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $60,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC — $60,053 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $41,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION — $26,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGOLDEN HEART RANCH — $25,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWISE READERS TO LEADERS — $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetPIECE BY PIECE — $17,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetBEAUTY BUS FOUNDATION — $15,091 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAngel City Alliance — $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ — $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE — $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLADYLIKE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSHAREWELL — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWest Valley Counseling Center A Non-Profit Organization — $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMUSICARES FOUNDATION INC — $9,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEL CABALLERO FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetWINGS OF RESCUE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetConnecting to Cure Crohn's and Colitis Inc — $5,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHALOM INSTITUTE CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER
  • Who funds LULU'S PLACE INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES
  • Who funds DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL
  • Who funds CONCERN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA
  • Who funds HILLEL 818
  • Who funds KIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
  • Who funds THE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION)
  • Who funds Beit T'Shuvah
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds BUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds GOLDEN HEART RANCH
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA31.9× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · Alpert & Alpert Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles Group · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · Lynn & Les Bider Family Foundation · The Marcia Israel Foundation Inc · Richard and Ellen Sandler Family Foundation · The Michael and Lori Milken Family Foundation · The Stanley & Joyce Black Family Foundation · The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bob & Nita Hirsch Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bob & Nita Hirsch Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bob & Nita Hirsch Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 103 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph