Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bob & Nita Hirsch Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.7M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Bob & Nita Hirsch Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Community Foundation Of The Jewish Federation Council Of Greater Los Angeles, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Bob & Nita Hirsch Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $3M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

20
’17
14
’18
12
’20
11
’21
21
’22
21
’23
10
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$3.3MHealth$2.1MArts & Culture$1.6MRecreation & Sports$1.1MYouth Development$1.0MReligion$733kEducation$641kInternational$401kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $137k
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.0M
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROVIDENCE CEDARS TARZANA FOUNDATION$1,700,000
LULU'S PLACE$1,000,000
LA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT COMMISSION$305,000
CONCERN FOUNDATION$82,100
HAROLD & CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION$55,000
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$30,000
ALZHEIMER'S GREATER LOS ANGELES$26,000
BEIT T'SHUVAH$23,000
LA JEWISH HEALTH$20,000
TENNIS HALL OF FAME$20,000
ANGEL CITY SPORTS$15,000
DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL$11,160
THE LADYLIKE FOUNDATION$10,000
ENDLESS SPORTS$7,500
CITY OF HOPE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GOLDEN HEART RANCH: $10k → 14%GOLDEN HEART RANCH: $10k → 14%GOLDEN HEART RANCH: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%ANGEL CITY SPORTS: $15k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%Los Angeles Police Foundation: $10k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NJ
RI
CA
NC
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 99% of Bob & Nita Hirsch Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 1%.

Bob & Nita Hirsch Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.9M · 44 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
48

Total granted

$8.9M
$835k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+27%

Still filing today

50%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER
    6× · 2017–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +26%
  • AG
    ALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $584k · revenue +28%
  • DT
    DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL
    6× · 2017–2024 · $433k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • H8
    HILLEL 818
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +22% · 35% of their budget
  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +8%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
2
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
3
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
4
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

—
5
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
6
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

—
7
Jewish Communal Fund

To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.

Philanthropy
8
Clal-the National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership Inc

A leading advocate for pluralism and diversity, clal offers jewish wisdom that enhances public life, deepens civic engagement and cultivates personal growth.

Religion
9
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
10
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
11
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
12
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles; the most unlike its peers is Jewish Life Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/49
Grantees still filing
35/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROVIDENCE CEDARS TARZANA FOUNDATION: $2,481,600 · OtherPROVIDENCE CEDARS TARZANA FOUNDATIONLA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT COMMISSION: $1,070,000 · OtherLA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT COMMISSIONTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $350,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONHAMAKOM: $328,598 · OtherHILLEL 818: $250,000 · Other+69 more: $2,014,520 · Other+69 moreJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $2,000,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUN…CONCERN FOUNDATION: $423,600 · PhilanthropyCONCERN FOUNDATIONCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY …+1 more: $50,000 · PhilanthropySKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $1,399,999 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL CUL…LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $69,258 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $37,200 · Arts & CultureLULU'S PLACE INC: $1,000,000 · Recreation & SportsALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $583,500 · HealthPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA: $275,000 · HealthTHE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION): $85,000 · Health+5 more: $43,591 · HealthKIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $210,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $175,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $150,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $25,000 · International+4 more: $28,500 · InternationalDE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL: $432,760 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $60,400 · EducationAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · Education
Other$6,494,718Philanthropy$2,673,600Arts & Culture$1,506,457Recreation & Sports$1,000,000Health$987,091International$588,500Education$523,160

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $1,399,999 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetLULU'S PLACE INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $583,500 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetDE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL: $432,760 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION: $423,600 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $350,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA: $275,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHILLEL 818: $250,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetKIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $210,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $175,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION): $85,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $74,800 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $69,258 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC: $67,800 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $60,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $60,053 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $41,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $26,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGOLDEN HEART RANCH: $25,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWISE READERS TO LEADERS: $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetPIECE BY PIECE: $17,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetBEAUTY BUS FOUNDATION: $15,091 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAngel City Alliance: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWest Valley Counseling Center A Non-Profit Organization: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHAREWELL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLADYLIKE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSICARES FOUNDATION INC: $9,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEL CABALLERO FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetConnecting to Cure Crohn's and Colitis Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetWINGS OF RESCUE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHALOM INSTITUTE CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LULU'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CONCERN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL 818 ↗
  • Who funds KIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds THE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION) ↗
  • Who funds Beit T'Shuvah ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN HEART RANCH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA31.9× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · Alpert & Alpert Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles Group · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · Lynn & Les Bider Family Foundation · The Marcia Israel Foundation Inc · Richard and Ellen Sandler Family Foundation · The Michael and Lori Milken Family Foundation · The Stanley & Joyce Black Family Foundation · The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bob & Nita Hirsch Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bob & Nita Hirsch Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bob & Nita Hirsch Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bob & Nita Hirsch Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bob & Nita Hirsch Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph