· Private foundation
Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $323k
- $50k–250k18 grants · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BIG BROTHERS - BIG SISTERS OF THE T | $150,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | $145,000 |
| GOLDEN GIRL INC | $106,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $100,500 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $96,000 |
| CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATES INC FBO CRIDL | $85,000 |
| HUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART | $80,000 |
| HUNTINGTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $75,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $75,000 |
| WALKING MIRACLES FAMILY FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| GREATER HUNTINGTON PARK & RECREATIO | $75,000 |
| YMCA | $68,800 |
| FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF HUNTIN | $67,000 |
| HUNTINGTON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM | $66,000 |
| HERITAGE FARM MUSEUM | $65,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
42 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GGGOLDEN GIRL INC5× · 2020–2025 · $601k · revenue +53%
- HSHUNTINGTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $470k · revenue +14% · 36% of their budget
- HMHUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC6× · 2020–2025 · $315k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- BBBIG BROTHERS - BIG SISTERone grant, 2022 · $100k
- CACHRISTIAN ASSOCIATESone grant, 2022 · $60k
- BBBIG BROTHERS - BIG SISTERS OF THEone grant, 2023 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv
The organization's mission is to provide educational and therapeutic services for children (age 0-5 years) with and without disabilities.
Provide childd care services and preschool for children birth to age 12
Child care and preschool provider
The establishment and operation of a child learning/daycare facility for the use, benefit, and general welfare of the children of rappahannock county, virginia.
Bringing industry and new businesses to the tri-state area, particularly huntington, west virginia.
Supervision of child care providers
Services to challenged individuals in Vocational,Residential, Home Based, and Community settings.
Promote and advance decent, safe and sanitary housing for persons of low and moderate income, the elderly, disadvantaged or infirm, in the cabell- wayne counties and surrounding metropolitan area of west virginia.
Providing access to a comprehensive and coordinated array of needed services, including outreach crisis, intervention, advocacy, parent education, daycare, informational referrals and linkages, and childrens' recreation and educational…
To provide daycare and child development services to children
It is our mission to provide a child-centered environment, treating each child and family with respect.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of the River Cities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mountaineer Autism Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GOLDEN GIRL INC ↗
- Who funds HUNTINGTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS RIVER CITIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPMENTAL THERAPY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF HUNTINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds LILY'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds FACING HUNGER FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Tri State Inc ↗
- Who funds KEITH ALBEE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JOHN W HEREFORD BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUBS OF HUNTINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN ACRES REGIONAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Huntington Children's Museum Inc ↗
- Who funds MOUNTWEST FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Foundation for the Tri-State Community Inc · The Huntington Foundation Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · The Wm M & a Cafaro Family Foundation · United Way of the River Cities Inc · Brown Dog Yoga Foundation · Stella Fuller Settlement Inc · Jeannine y Francis Charitable Foundation Trust · Arthur and Joan Weisberg Family Foundation Inc · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Peoples Bank Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo?
Find your warmest path to Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.