Skip to content

· Private foundation

Blue Sky Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$17MEnvironment$12MCommunity Improvement$6.1MInternational$5.8MHuman Services$990kHousing & Shelter$815kHealth$787kPhilanthropy$621kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $250
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $350k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.8M
$30,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$293k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW LIFE MINISTRIES$2,500,000
NORTHSIDE CHRISTIAN CHURCH$250,000
RIVER HERITAGE CONSERVANCY$150,000
SEED LOUISVILLE INC$100,000
HOOSIERS FOR GOOD INC$100,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA INC$43,000
NADUS FILMS INC$31,500
ARUKAH ANIMAL INTERNATIONAL$30,000
SMILE TRAIN$20,000
PAN AMERICAN SANCTUARY ALLICANCE$15,000
FORGET ME NOT MINISTRIES$10,000
KENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
DISCOVERY INSTITUTE$10,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY SOUTHEAST$10,000
IU FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $424k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SCALA FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%ORPHAN CARE ALLIANCE: $420k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44M · 32 repeat orgs$3.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
37

Total granted

$44M
$2.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+38%

Still filing today

47%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $240k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsInternationalRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    RIVER HERITAGE CONSERVANCY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $12M · revenue ×12 · 91% of their budget
  • AV
    ACCESS VENTURES INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $6.1M · revenue +15% · 43% of their budget
  • NL
    New Life International Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5.0M · revenue +90% · 83% of their budget

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2022 · $570k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $525k · revenue +189%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $500k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
3
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
4
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
5
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
6
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
7
Cintrifuse

To empower Cincinnati entrepreneurs to launch bold, scalable startups; and we work to improve the odds of those startups growing into transformational companies.

Community Improvement
8
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
Nuvance Health

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
11
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
12
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St John Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Access Ventures Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
24/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW LIFE MINISTRIES: $10,000,000 · OtherNEW LIFE MINISTRIESNORTHSIDE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $4,490,000 · OtherNORTHSIDE CHRISTIAN CHURCH+60 more: $5,630,145 · Other+60 moreRIVER HERITAGE CONSERVANCY INC: $11,939,105 · Recreation & SportsRIVER HERITAGE CONSERVANCY I…+1 more: $29,692 · Recreation & SportsACCESS VENTURES INC: $6,100,000 · Community ImprovementACCESS VENTURE…New Life International Inc: $4,955,000 · InternationalNew Life Inte…NADUS FILMS INC: $875,500 · InternationalNADUS FILMS I…+1 more: $2,000 · InternationalJEFFERSON STREET BAPTIST CENTER INC: $1,975,000 · ReligionNF2 BIOSOLUTIONS: $600,000 · HealthNORTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA INC: $493,000 · PhilanthropyMETRO UNITED WAY INC: $116,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$20,120,145Recreation & Sports$11,968,797Community Improvement$6,100,000International$5,832,500Religion$1,975,000Health$625,000Philanthropy$610,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRIVER HERITAGE CONSERVANCY INC: $11,939,105 over 8y, 91% of budgetACCESS VENTURES INC: $6,100,000 over 3y, 43% of budgetNew Life International Inc: $4,955,000 over 3y, 83% of budgetJEFFERSON STREET BAPTIST CENTER INC: $1,975,000 over 3y, 62% of budgetNADUS FILMS INC: $875,500 over 4y, 92% of budgetNF2 BIOSOLUTIONS: $600,000 over 2y, 45% of budgetST JOHN CENTER INC: $525,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA INC: $493,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetORPHAN CARE ALLIANCE INC: $420,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetMaker Mobile Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetFLOYD SERVICE PROJECT INC: $153,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetPAN AFRICAN SANCTUARY ALLIANCE INC: $145,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetMETRO UNITED WAY INC: $116,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $110,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $107,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOOSIERS FOR GOOD INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetDISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $80,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHOMELESS COALITION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA INC: $75,106 over 2y, 25% of budgetARUKAH ANIMAL INTERNATIONAL: $30,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetNorthwestern University: $29,692 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FALLS OF THE OHIO FOUNDATION: $27,530 over 3y, 22% of budgetNORTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKENTUCKY DERBY FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARKINSON SUPPORT CENTER OF KENTUCKY: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetScala Foundation A NJ Nonprofit Corporation: $3,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILIES LEARNING INC: $3,495 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENDEAVOR GLOBAL INC (F/K/A THE ENDEAVOR INITIATIVE INC): $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMTEC ASSOCIATES FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF LOUISVILLE INC: $447 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RIVER HERITAGE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS VENTURES INC ↗
  • Who funds New Life International Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON STREET BAPTIST CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NADUS FILMS INC ↗
  • Who funds NF2 BIOSOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds ORPHAN CARE ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Maker Mobile Inc ↗
  • Who funds FLOYD SERVICE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PAN AFRICAN SANCTUARY ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds METRO UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HOOSIERS FOR GOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ALBANY TOWNSHIP LITTLE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HOMELESS COALITION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Louisville IncKY26.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Community Foundation of Southern Indiana Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Hazel & Walter Bales Foundation · Horseshoe Foundation of Floyd County Inc · Access Ventures Inc · Lift a Life Foundation Inc · Norton Healthcare Inc · Republic Bank Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blue Sky Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blue Sky Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 68%
  • Pan African Sanctuary Alliance Inc: 68% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Blue Sky Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Blue Sky Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Blue Sky’s filings →

More from the funding graph