Skip to content

· Private foundation

Blue Sky Family Foundation-Ima

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$285k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$369kArts & Culture$183kEnvironment$180kFood & Nutrition$125kEducation$115kPhilanthropy$115kAnimals$58kScience & Tech$48kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $208k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAOLI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$50,000
CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK$35,000
AUDUBON AT MILL GROVE$30,000
PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART$25,000
FRENCH & PICKERING CREEK TRUST$25,000
THE CLINIC$22,500
COMMUNITY COALITION$20,000
LIVING CLASSROOM$20,000
ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
THORNCROFT$10,000
HISTORIC YELLOW SPRINGS INC$7,500
BAKER INDUSTRIES$7,500
NATURAL LANDS TRUST$5,000
STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHESTER COUNTY FUND FOR WOMEN & GIRLS: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MD
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 24 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
4

Total granted

$1.3M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+19%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyScience & TechFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PM
    PAOLI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $170k · revenue +13%
  • PF
    PHOENIXVILLE FREE CLINIC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $95k · revenue +59%
  • CV
    COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $65k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +19%
  • ML
    Main Line Animal Rescue Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +6%
  • MJ
    MICHAEL J FOX PARKINSON'S FND
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Glen Foerd Conservation Corporation

Glen foerd stewards an eclectic riverfront estate for the enjoyment and educational benefit of the community. drawing from the estate's architecture, art, material culture, and history-as well as its gardens and waterways-glen foerd…

Environment
2
Allegheny County Conservation District

The Allegheny County Conservation District is an urban conservation district that engages and leads through partnerships, innovation, and implementation to conserve, promote, and improve Allegheny Countys natural resources.

Environment
3
Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc

The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.

—
4
Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy

We improve quality of life by enhancing and stewarding pittsburgh's parks in partnership with the community.

Recreation & Sports
5
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
6
The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society

Founded in 1827, the pennsylvania horticultural society (phs) uses horticulture to advance the health and well-being of the greater philadelphia region. (continued in sch o)phs's work focuses on four impact priorities: creating healthy…

Environment
7
Chester County Community Foundation

The chester county community foundation connects people who care with the causes that matter, so their philanthropy makes a difference now and forever.

Philanthropy
8
Philadelphia Area Consortium of Special Collections Libraries Inc

Pacscl members collaborate to make their collections broadly available through joint projects and promotion of professional standards, and fosters the special collections community.

—
9
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
10
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
11
Chestnut Hill Conservancy

The Chestnut Hill Conservancy conserves, preserves, and celebrates history, architecture, and landscapes in Chestnut Hill and the lower Wissahickon watershed through inclusive and proactive community engagement, advocacy, and stewardship.

Arts & Culture
12
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Paoli Memorial Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Philadelphia Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRENCH & PICKERING CREEK TRUST: $120,000 · OtherFRENCH & PICKERING CREEK TRUSTLIVING CLASSROOM: $60,000 · OtherLIVING CLASSROOMLIVING CLASSROOMS: $55,000 · OtherLIVING CLASSROOMSAUDUBON AT MILL GROVE: $50,000 · OtherAUDUBON AT MILL GROVEIndividual grant recipient: $38,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBAKER INDUSTRIES INC: $37,500 · OtherBAKER INDUSTRIES INCTHORNCROFT: $30,000 · OtherTHORNCROFTTHORNCROFT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,500 · Other+6 more: $46,500 · Other+6 morePAOLI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $170,000 · HealthPAOLI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUN…PHOENIXVILLE FREE CLINIC: $95,000 · HealthPHOENIXVILLE FREE CLINICCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $65,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDI…PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $110,000 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA M…Brandywine Conservancy & Museum of Art: $47,500 · Arts & CultureBrandywine Con…HISTORIC YELLOW SPRINGS INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC YELLO…CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK: $125,000 · Food & NutritionCHESTER CO…COMMUNITY COALITION: $105,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY…THE JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JORDA…THE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA: $47,500 · Science & TechSTROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER: $25,000 · Science & TechNatural Lands Trust Inc: $20,000 · EnvironmentTHE FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$482,500Health$330,000Arts & Culture$172,500Food & Nutrition$125,000Philanthropy$115,000Science & Tech$72,500Environment$20,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPAOLI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $170,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK: $125,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $110,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY COALITION: $105,000 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetPHOENIXVILLE FREE CLINIC: $95,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $65,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLIVING CLASSROOM: $60,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetTHE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA: $47,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBrandywine Conservancy & Museum of Art: $47,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBAKER INDUSTRIES INC: $37,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSTROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNatural Lands Trust Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORIC YELLOW SPRINGS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMain Line Animal Rescue Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PAOLI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIXVILLE FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds LIVING CLASSROOM ↗
  • Who funds THE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds Brandywine Conservancy & Museum of Art ↗
  • Who funds BAKER INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Natural Lands Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC YELLOW SPRINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds Main Line Animal Rescue Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chester County Community FoundationPA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chester County Community Foundation · Hamilton Family Foundation · Claneil Foundation Inc · Macelree Family Foundation · First Cornerstone Foundation Inc-Ima · Hankin Foundation · Quaker City Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blue Sky Family Foundation-Ima funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blue Sky Family Foundation-Ima. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Blue Sky Family Foundation-Ima’s filings →

    More from the funding graph