Skip to content

· Private foundation

Blue Skies Farm Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$248k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$145k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$356kEnvironment$22kHuman Services$15kRecreation & Sports$13kInternational$10kScience & Tech$10kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $195k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sky High Farm$145,000
Stone Barns Restoration Corp$50,000
West Side Campaign Against Hunger$20,000
Madoo Conservancy Inc$10,000
New York Sun Works Inc$10,000
Snug Harbor Cultural Center & Botanical Garden$5,000
MAD Foundation$5,000
New Yorkers for Parks$2,500
Second Chance Foods$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MAD Foundation: $10k → 8%MAD Foundation: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$303k · 4 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$303k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+33%

Still filing today

75%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Food & NutritionEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SKY HIGH FARM INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $245k · revenue -56%
  • WS
    WEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue +4%
  • MF
    MAD FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k

Funded once

  • FS
    Food & Society Aspen Institute
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • NY
    NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDENgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +43%
  • PROVIDENCE FARM COLLECTIVE CORPgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sustainable Growers
—
2
Council On the Environment Inc

Council on the environment, inc. d/b/a grownyc ("grownyc") empowers all new yorkers to equitably access fresh, locally grown food and neighborhood green spaces, reduce waste, and care for the environment.

Environment
3
Brooklyn Heights Community Garden

Brooklyn Heights Community Garden cultivates healthy community through growing food, intergenerational learning and creative play.

Community Improvement
4
New York Sustainable Agriculture Working Group

New York Sustainable Agricultural Working Group (NYSAWG) is a not-for-profit organization located in western New York to raise awareness of issues affecting the sustainability of the food and agriculture system. The Organizations mission…

Food & Nutrition
5
Hudson Yards Development Corporation

See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…

Community Improvement
6
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food, with the goals of cultivating community and alleviating hunger in our city.

Food & Nutrition
7
The Hudson Carbon Research Foundation in

Hudson carbon is dedicated to catalyzing the adoption of regenerative organic agriculture by advancing our scientific understanding of its practices and systems, and their potential to radically reverse climate change and environmental…

Environment
8
Denver Urban Gardens

Denver urban gardens' (dug) mission is to provide access, skills, and resources for people to grow healthy food in community and regenerate urban green spaces.

Environment
9
Farm Training Collective Nyc Inc

The goal of Farm School NYC is to train the next generation of farmers in New York City and beyond, with a focus on limited resourced and socially disadvantaged individuals and communities, and to increase access to healthy, local food in…

Education
10
City Growers Inc

Through our original curriculum design that uses innovative growing spaces on rooftop farms, in school gardens, and public parks - city growers fosters a love of nature and encourages nyc youth to consider their place, agency, and future…

Food & Nutrition
11
Sweet Farm Foundation

Sweet farm is the world's first nonprofit sanctuary to address the devastating impact that factory farming has on climate change from the perspective of animals, plants, and the planet. we must first understand how these pieces are…

Animals
12
City Green Inc

To revitalize urban areas through agricultural and education programming. the organization offers practical, technical, and financial resources in support of environmental stewardship, equitable access to healthy food, and ecologically…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Side Center for Community Life; the most unlike its peers is Mad Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SKY HIGH FARM INC: $245,000 · Food & NutritionSKY HIGH FARM INCPROVIDENCE FARM COLLECTIVE CORP: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $3,000 · Food & NutritionStone Barns Restoration Corp DBA Stone Barns Center for Food & Agri: $50,000 · Arts & CultureStone Barns R…WEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentFood & Society Aspen Institute: $15,000 · OtherFood & Soc…NEW YORKERS FOR PARKS: $12,500 · OtherNEW YORKER…CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $10,000 · OtherCHARITIES …PERFECT EARTH PROJECT INC: $2,000 · OtherMADOO CONSERVANCY INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $10,000 · EnvironmentSNUG HARBOR CULTURAL CENTER AND BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $2,500 · EnvironmentMAD FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Human ServicesNEW YORK SUN WORKS INC: $10,000 · Science & Tech
Food & Nutrition$258,000Arts & Culture$50,000Youth Development$30,000Other$39,500Environment$27,500Human Services$15,000Science & Tech$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSKY HIGH FARM INC: $245,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetStone Barns Restoration Corp DBA Stone Barns Center for Food & Agri: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORKERS FOR PARKS: $12,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNEW YORK SUN WORKS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMADOO CONSERVANCY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE FARM COLLECTIVE CORP: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSNUG HARBOR CULTURAL CENTER AND BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPERFECT EARTH PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND CHANCE FOODS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA11.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blue Skies Farm Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blue Skies Farm Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Blue Skies Farm Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Blue Skies Farm Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Blue Skies Farm’s filings →

    More from the funding graph