Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Block Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$331k
Granted FY2019
39
Grants FY2019
9
States reached
$41k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Block Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Block Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 29 organizations, $331k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

49
17
48
18
29
19
21
20
0
21
1
22
0
23
0
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$5.8MCrime & Legal$295kHealth$235kHousing & Shelter$147kCivil Rights$127kEnvironment$111kInternational$107kEducation$87kOther$0
02FY2019 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k25 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $270k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$383k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE DOE FUND$41,000
GETTING OUT AND STAYING OUT$30,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$25,500
HARLEM GROWN$25,000
VIEQUES CONSERVATION AND HISTORICAL TRUST$20,000
MICRO AID INTERNATIONAL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
BROOKLYN COMMUNITY BAIL FUND$15,000
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$15,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PUERTO RICO$15,000
WOMEN'S SUPPORT SERVICES$15,000
MUSICIANS ON CALL$13,320
NATIONAL CENTER FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES$10,000
SALISBURY FAMILY SERVICES INC$10,000
NOMI NETWORK$7,750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOMEN'S SUPPORT SERVICES: $15k → 9%WOMEN'S SUPPORT SERVICES: $5k → 9%WOMEN'S SUPPORT SERVICES: $2k → 9%WOMEN'S SUPPORT SERVICES: $1k → 9%SALISBURY FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10k → 9%SALISBURY FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10k → 9%SALISBURY FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5k → 9%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $1k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $1k → 17%HARTLEY HOUSE: $550 → 17%HARTLEY HOUSE: $500 → 17%HARTLEY HOUSE: $250 → 17%TANENBAUM CENTER FOR INTERRELIGIOUS UNDERSTANDING: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
VA
MD
NM
DC
LA
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 60 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

60 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2019, 29 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
31

Total granted

$1.4M
$74k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+23%

Still filing today

68%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEducationHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GO
    GETTING OUT AND STAYING OUT INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $207k · revenue +165%
  • THE DOE FUND INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $96k · revenue +37%
  • CP
    CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $69k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • DV
    DEFY VENTURES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -17%
  • NC
    NORTHWEST CORNER PRESERVATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue -79%
  • MT
    MOVE THIS WORLD INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -98%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
4
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
5
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
8
Long Island University

To provide excellence and access in private higher education to those who seek to expand their knowledge and prepare themselves for meaningful, educated lives and for service to their communities and the world.

9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

12
The Architectural League of New York

The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Learning Disabilities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHospice Care ServicesPublic Library SupportCommunity Health CentersGovernment Accountability R…Volunteer Fire DepartmentsElementary Literacy TutoringEducation Equity LeadershipYouth Sports Booster Organi…Christian Missionary Organi…Cancer Support OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionCommunity Arts OrganizationsJewish Community FederationsClassical Music EnsemblesYouth Development CentersUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Land Conservation Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%6%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr17%16%20–35yr11%34%35–55yr13%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr17%88%20–35yr11%6%35–55yr13%3%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%2/76
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,902

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/71
Grantees still filing
53/71
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $5,752,281 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC+2 more — $13,000 · PhilanthropyPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $125,500 · OtherPLANNED PAREN…THE VIEQUES CONSERVATION AND HISTORICAL TRUST INC — $58,750 · OtherTHE VIEQUES C…HOUSING & SOLUTIONS INC — $43,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PUERTO RICO INC — $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $32,000 · OtherNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES INC — $30,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF RHODE ISLAND — $30,000 · OtherMICROAID INTERNATIONAL INC — $40,000 · OtherHARLEM GROWN INC — $40,500 · Other+76 more — $418,591 · Other+76 moreGETTING OUT AND STAYING OUT INC — $206,564 · Crime & LegalBROOKLYN COMMUNITY BAIL FUND INC — $42,000 · Crime & LegalNOMI NETWORK INC — $38,750 · Crime & Legal+2 more — $10,000 · Crime & LegalTHE DOE FUND INC — $96,000 · Housing & ShelterLEAP INC — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $60,500 · Civil RightsREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $50,000 · Civil RightsALFRED UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · EducationPRATT INSTITUTE — $20,000 · EducationDEFY VENTURES INC — $15,000 · Education+4 more — $2,750 · EducationCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $68,800 · Recreation & SportsFRESH AIR FUND — $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$5,765,281Other$858,341Crime & Legal$297,314Housing & Shelter$111,000Civil Rights$110,500Education$87,750Recreation & Sports$71,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $5,752,281 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGETTING OUT AND STAYING OUT INC — $206,564 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC — $96,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $68,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $60,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VIEQUES CONSERVATION AND HISTORICAL TRUST INC — $58,750 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALFRED UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN COMMUNITY BAIL FUND INC — $42,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetHARLEM GROWN INC — $40,500 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetMICROAID INTERNATIONAL INC — $40,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetNOMI NETWORK INC — $38,750 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetProject Rhythm Inc — $25,800 over 3y, 25% of budgetSALISBURY FAMILY SERVICES INC — $25,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetPROJECT SAGE INC — $22,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetVIEQUESLOVE INC — $21,500 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetPRATT INSTITUTE — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSICIANS ON CALL INC — $19,320 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWATTS OF LOVE — $19,250 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetDEFY VENTURES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLEAP INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPRESERVATION HALL FOUNDATION INC — $13,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE INC — $11,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetTHE HOPE PROGRAM INC — $9,600 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH ACTION PROGRAMS AND HOMES INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTELLA ADLER STUDIO OF ACTING — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST CORNER PRESERVATION INC — $6,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetMOVE THIS WORLD INC — $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMusic Mountain Incorporated — $3,850 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHappy Sonship — $2,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC — $2,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S PRISON ASSOCIATION AND HOME — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KRISTEN ANN CARR FUND — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S HEALTH COALITION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST HARLEM TUTORIAL PROGRAM INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOWER EAST SIDE TENEMENT MUSEUM — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBEHIND THE BOOK INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Express FoundationNY20.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Express Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The New York Community Trust · Silver Mountain Foundation for the Arts · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Steven Aresty Foundation · Middle Road Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Northwest Connecticut Community Foundation Inc · Brooklyn Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Block Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • The Salisbury Association Inc54% of income from government
  • Yale University12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • Music Mountain Incorporated0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Block Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Block Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph