· Private foundation
Silver Mountain Foundation for the Arts
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k41 grants · $94k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $390k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $180k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Save the Children | $1,000,000 |
| NPR | $80,000 |
| Planned Parenthood Federation Of America | $50,000 |
| Salisbury Housing Committee | $50,000 |
| The Climate Reality Project | $25,000 |
| Oceana | $25,000 |
| Fredonia College Foundation | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| Vassar College | $25,000 |
| New York Women in Film & Television | $25,000 |
| Lakeville Journal Foundation | $20,000 |
| Capital & Main | $20,000 |
| Partners in Health | $20,000 |
| International Rescue Committee | $20,000 |
| Duke University | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $300k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
79 repeat relationships — 64 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VCVASSAR COLLEGE5× · 2020–2024 · $906k · revenue +43%
- NWNATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM4× · 2021–2024 · $355k · revenue +25%
- IRInternational Rescue Committee INC4× · 2020–2024 · $295k · revenue +63%
Funded once
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCone grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +21%- TATHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICAone grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue -24%
Feeding Americagraduatedone grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +40%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ms Foundation for Women Inc and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SCREEN ACTORS GUILD-AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TELEVISION AND RADIO ARTISTS FOUND ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL & MAIN ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION ↗
- Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK WOMEN IN FILM & TELEVISION INC ↗
- Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
- Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds The Danbury Hospital ↗
- Who funds LJMN Media Inc ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SALISBURY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds THEATRE DEVELOPMENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds COLOR OF CHANGEORG EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARTIST BOOK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EUGENE O'NEILL MEMORIAL THEATER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds KAGENO WORLDWIDE INC ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds SALISBURY HOUSING COMMITTEE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Findlay Family Foundation · Middle Road Foundation · Northwest Connecticut Community Foundation Inc · Anne and Rollin Bates Foundation Inc · Block Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · Steven Aresty Foundation · The Bok Family Foundation · Elliott Family Foundation Inc · The Kurtz Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Silver Mountain Foundation for the Arts funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Salisbury Housing Committee Inc — 70% of income from government
- The Salisbury Association Inc — 54% of income from government
- Christopher Reeve Foundation — 49% of income from government
- Housatonic Valley Association Inc — 38% of income from government
- Housatonic Youth Service Bureau Inc — 33% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Artist Book Foundation — 3% of income from government
- Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Eugene O'neill Memorial Theater Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Pilobolus Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Danbury Hospital — 1% of income from government
- Denison Pequotsepos Nature Center — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Silver Mountain Foundation for the Arts?
Find your warmest path to Silver Mountain Foundation for the Arts through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.