Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Blanche Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$343k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

International$970kHuman Services$456kHousing & Shelter$336kHealth$269kYouth Development$98kFood & Nutrition$50kEducation$39kReligion$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $232k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$12,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$100,000
LOVING CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
POSITIVE TOMORROWS$20,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$20,000
FLORISH HOMES INC$17,000
ANTIOCH CHRISTIAN ACADEMY & PRESCHOOL$15,000
Individual grant recipient$14,000
KERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER$12,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES USA$12,000
CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE$12,000
OKC POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE$10,000
ORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN$10,000
OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN$10,000
CITY RESCUE MISSION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $382k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $12k → 9%FLORISH HOMES INC: $17k → 9%CARE CENTER: $6k → 16%COOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $40k → 18%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $12k → 9%FLORISH HOMES INC: $17k → 9%CARE CENTER: $6k → 16%FLORISH HOMES INC: $15k → 9%CARE CENTER: $5k → 16%FLORISH HOMES INC: $15k → 9%CARE CENTER: $5k → 16%CARE CENTER: $5k → 16%CARE CENTER: $5k → 16%CARE CENTER: $5k → 16%CARE CENTER: $5k → 16%CARE CENTER: $4k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 16%OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $30k → 16%OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $30k → 16%OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $30k → 16%OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 16%OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 16%OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 16%OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 16%OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $18k → 16%OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NE
VA
NM
AR
TN
NC
OK

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 21 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
1

Total granted

$2.2M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+1%

Still filing today

57%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalReligionHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $820k · revenue +134%
  • OB
    OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $198k · revenue +18%
  • OG
    ORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $80k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • CH
    COOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
2
One Church One Child Inc

To inform the public the need for bridge family homes and identify families interested in adopting or fostering children of all races with special emphasis on African American children in state custody.

Housing & Shelter
3
Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc

The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…

Crime & Legal
4
Project Orphans Inc dba Tulsa Girls Home

We exist to provide: 1. Community development & care to orphans, vulnerable children, powerless young-women and broken families located in Uganda, Africa. 2. The highest quality residential care for girls needing placement outside their…

Religion
5
Christian Home of Pecos

Christain Home

Crime & Legal
6
Refuge City

Refuge city provides safe places for children in dallas / ft. worth (dfw) who have been sex trafficked or sexually exploited to achieve restoration, education, and reintegration in a family-focused environment through the love of jesus…

Human Services
7
Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…

Education
8
Murrow Indian Children's Home

Residential care facility for neglected and dependent american indian children. the home has three buildings that are used as homes for the children to enable murrow to further the original traditions and purposes as they were established…

9
Every Orphans Hope

We exist to glorify God through the church and see orphans raised to life in Christ, in a home, in a family, and in a community where they are known and loved.

Religion
10
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
11
The Orphans Hands Inc

The Orphan's Hands provides a safe home and education for orphaned youth at risk of being trafficked in high-risk countries while bringing the love and hope of Jesus.

International
12
Habitat for Humanity of Okaloosa County Inc

Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Positive Tomorrows Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAMARITAN'S PURSE — $820,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEIndividual grant recipient — $210,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLOVING CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER — $155,000 · OtherLOVING CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $63,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SALVATION ARMY — $45,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYGOODLAND ACADEMY — $30,000 · OtherGLOBAL FREEDOM PROJECT — $30,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES USA — $24,000 · OtherFOCUS ON HOME INC — $34,000 · OtherKERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER — $24,000 · Other+3 more — $30,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC — $198,000 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA BAPTIST HO…FLOURISH HOMES INCORPORATED — $64,000 · Human ServicesFLOURISH HOMES INCO…Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center — $46,000 · Human ServicesCare Center-Child A…COOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesCOOKSON HILLS CHRIS…The Center of Family Love — $24,000 · Human ServicesThe Center of Famil…+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC — $82,000 · Youth DevelopmentOKLAHOMA CITY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE — $68,000 · Youth DevelopmentORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INC — $80,000 · InternationalONE WORLD INC — $40,000 · InternationalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $80,000 · HealthREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC — $50,000 · Food & Nutrition
Religion$820,000Other$645,000Human Services$382,000Youth Development$150,000International$120,000Health$80,000Food & Nutrition$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $820,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC — $198,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC — $82,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INC — $80,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $80,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE — $68,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetFLOURISH HOMES INCORPORATED — $64,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCare Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center — $46,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCOOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $40,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetONE WORLD INC — $40,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetFOCUS ON HOME INC — $34,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetKERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER — $24,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe Center of Family Love — $24,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC
  • Who funds ORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE
  • Who funds FLOURISH HOMES INCORPORATED
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC
  • Who funds Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center
  • Who funds COOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds ONE WORLD INC
  • Who funds FOCUS ON HOME INC
  • Who funds KERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER
  • Who funds The Center of Family Love
  • Who funds CITY RESCUE MISSION INC
  • Who funds REMERGE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sarkeys FoundationOK17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sarkeys Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Love Meyer Family Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · American Fidelity Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Blanche Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Remerge Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Blanche Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Blanche Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph