Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Blackberry Farm Foundation

The BLACKBERRY FARM FOUNDATION is proud to support charitable causes related to children and foodways, with special emphasis on those located in the east tennessee area, the special place that is our home.

$356k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Education$277kCrime & Legal$210kHuman Services$183kYouth Development$110kPhilanthropy$106kEmployment$92kEnvironment$90kArts & Culture$76kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $274k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROSSROADS CAMPUS$140,402
THE BUSYHEAD PROJECT$83,581
PELLISSIPPI STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$50,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TENNESSEE VALLEY$30,000
SPECIAL OPPS INC$27,715
AMERICANA MUSIC FOUNDATION$10,148
YMCA KNOXVILLE & TENNESSEE VALLEY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $274k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HAND IN HAND: $5k → 12%SPECIAL OPPS INC: $28k → 10%CROSSROADS CAMPUS: $140k → 14%YMCA KNOXVILLE & TENNESSEE VALLEY: $10k → 12%SPECIAL OPPS INC: $15k → 10%SPECIAL OPPS INC: $15k → 10%SPECIAL OPPS INC: $13k → 10%HARMONY FAMILY CENTER: $20k → 12%SPECIAL OPPS INC: $11k → 10%HARMONY FAMILY CENTER: $8k → 12%SPECIAL OPPS INC: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
IL
NY
IA
CA
CO
AZ
TN
DC
MS
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$844k · 8 repeat orgs$438k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
16

Total granted

$844k
$194k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+29%

Still filing today

88%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $244k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BLOUNT COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $210k · revenue +18%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL
    6× · 2019–2024 · $105k · revenue +23%
  • SO
    Special Opps Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $92k · revenue +259%

Funded once

  • CE
    CARPENTERS ELEMENTARY FRIENDS PROGRAM
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
  • SH
    Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $36k · revenue +29%
  • BE
    BRETT ELDREDGE FAMILY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $22k · revenue -99%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brooklyn Heights Community Garden

Brooklyn Heights Community Garden cultivates healthy community through growing food, intergenerational learning and creative play.

Community Improvement
2
Nourish Knoxville Inc

To cultivate healthy communities by supporting relationships between local farmers, producers, and the public.

Food & Nutrition
3
Big BrothersBig Sisters of Wnc Inc

Match mentoring volunteers with children in need to build and foster relationships.

4
Black Mountain Center Foundation

BMCF is commited to improving the lives of persons with specialized intellectual developmental disorders and persons with specialized dementia served by Black Mountain Neuro-Medical Treatment Center. We foster a culture of inclusion and…

Philanthropy
5
Brighter Bites Inc

To create communities of health through fresh food. Brighter Bites seeks to improve health outcomes among children and families in under-resourced communities by using data-driven, evidence-based strategies for providing fresh produce and…

Food & Nutrition
6
A Bridge for Kids

To build bridges to brighter futures for teenagers who have big aspirations but face barriers to achieving their full potential. provides financial benefits to teenagers based on applications demonstrating need and a worthy activity that…

Human Services
7
The Heimerdinger Foundation Inc

We nourish the bodies, minds, and hearts of those facing cancer through the power of healthy meals and nutrition education.

Health
8
Kids in Nutrition

Kids In Nutrition (KIN) is a nationwide student-led movement dedicated to food justice, sustainable systems, and improved health outcomes for youth through food literacy and access. Recognizing that lifelong habits develop early, KIN…

Food & Nutrition
9
Walk Bike Nashville Inc

Walk/bike nashville is working to build a more walkable, bikeable, and livable nashville.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Brandworkers International Inc

Brandworkers is a non-profit organization of local food-making workers coming together for a good job and sustainable food system.

Civil Rights
11
My Brother's Keeper Inc

Reduce health disparities throughout the United States by enhancing the health and well-being of minority and marginalized populations through leadership collaboration with the public and with community healthcare practices.

Health
12
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Triangle Inc

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth. the organization's vision is that all youth achieve their full potential.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hand in Hand and the most unlike its peers is Brett Eldredge Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDevelopmental Disabilities …Youth Development CentersYmca Community CentersUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Christian Missionary Organi…Community Arts OrganizationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Food Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%7%<5yr14%22%5–10yr17%19%10–20yr13%26%20–35yr11%11%35–55yr24%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%10%<5yr14%5%5–10yr17%25%10–20yr13%40%20–35yr11%6%35–55yr24%13%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
13%
4,628/36,371

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
16/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PELLISSIPPI STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $250,000 · OtherPELLISSIPPI STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGECARPENTERS ELEMENTARY FRIENDS PROGRAM — $39,770 · OtherCARPENTERS ELEMENTARY FRIENDS PROGRA…UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI — $15,000 · OtherSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc — $35,840 · OtherSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolin…Best Buddies International Inc — $20,000 · OtherUSA CYCLING DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Other+8 more — $41,300 · Other+8 moreTHE CROSSROADS CAMPUS — $140,402 · Human ServicesTHE CROSSROADS CAMPUSSpecial Opps Inc — $91,585 · Human ServicesSpecial Opps IncHARMONY FAMILY CENTER INC — $27,500 · Human ServicesHARMONY FAMILY CENTER IN…Young Men's Christian Association of Middle Tennessee (6273) — $10,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesBLOUNT COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $210,000 · Crime & LegalBLOUNT COUNTY CHIL…THE BUSYHEAD PROJECT INC — $83,581 · PhilanthropyTHE BUSYHE…BRETT ELDREDGE FAMILY FOUNDATION — $22,000 · PhilanthropyBRETT ELDR…KREMPELS BRAIN INJURY CENTER — $15,000 · PhilanthropyKREMPELS B…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL — $105,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GI…Bellas Mentoring Inc — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentGREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS INSTITUTE INC — $80,000 · EnvironmentSIXTEEN THIRTY FUND — $5,000 · EnvironmentGREAT SMOKY MOUNTAIN HERITAGE CENTER — $60,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICANA MUSIC FOUNDATION — $10,148 · Arts & Culture
Other$416,910Human Services$274,487Crime & Legal$210,000Philanthropy$120,581Youth Development$110,000Environment$85,000Arts & Culture$70,148

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBLOUNT COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $210,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetTHE CROSSROADS CAMPUS — $140,402 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL — $105,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSpecial Opps Inc — $91,585 over 6y, 12% of budgetTHE BUSYHEAD PROJECT INC — $83,581 over 1y, 14% of budgetGREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS INSTITUTE INC — $80,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetGREAT SMOKY MOUNTAIN HERITAGE CENTER — $60,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc — $35,840 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARMONY FAMILY CENTER INC — $27,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBRETT ELDREDGE FAMILY FOUNDATION — $22,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKREMPELS BRAIN INJURY CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetUSA CYCLING DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICANA MUSIC FOUNDATION — $10,148 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Middle Tennessee (6273) — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Walk International — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTurning Green — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBellas Mentoring Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHUGS FOR US INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRETHINK FOOD NYC INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKELLER RESTAURANT RELIEF FUND — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHAND IN HAND — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSIXTEEN THIRTY FUND — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Martin Luther King Jr Center For Nonviolent Social Change Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Haslam Family Foundation IncTN15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Haslam Family Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Variety of Eastern Tennessee · East Tennessee Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Blackberry Farm Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph