Skip to content

Minnesota · Public charity

Black Visions

To organize powerful, connected communities and to dismantle systems of violence

$1.1M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Black Visions’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Headwaters Foundation For Justice, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’23
3
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2025
$1,100,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$1,100,000
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$12M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Employment$150kRecreation & Sports$68kCrime & Legal$50kCommunity Improvement$50kHuman Services$40kReligion$40kAnimals$25kEnvironment$25k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Our Streets$68,000111%
Minnesota Prison Writing Workshop$50,00018%
Isaiah$40,00010%
Community Power$25,00012%
Black Disability Collective$25,0001n/a
Mypitbullisfamily Com Inc$25,00018%
Sabathani Community Center$15,00010%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($150k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Black Visions with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Black Visions?

Find your warmest path to Black Visions through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Black Visions

How much does Black Visions give?
Black Visions reported 1 grants totaling $1,113,800 in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Black Visions fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2024, its largest causes are Employment (33%), Recreation & Sports (15%), Crime & Legal (11%).
Who are Black Visions's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2024: Our Streets ($68k), Minnesota Prison Writing Workshop ($50k), Isaiah ($40k).
Which funders back the same organizations as Black Visions?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Minneapolis Foundation, The McKnight Foundation, Xcel Energy Foundation.
Where is Black Visions based?
Black Visions is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Black Visions’ filings →

More from the funding graph