· Private foundation
Bitton Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $130k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LIST OF CONTRIBUTIONS ATTACHED | $129,688 |
| Individual grant recipient | $18,000 |
| NEDIVIM FOUNDATION | $8,400 |
| Individual grant recipient | $8,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,444 |
| R CHAIM KOLLELIM | $3,000 |
| TOAH IMAGES | $2,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,800 |
| SHAREI CHINUCH DAY SCHOOL | $1,800 |
| EL AMI | $1,800 |
| CHICAGO CHESED FUND | $1,000 |
| CHABAD OF SOUTH BOWARD | $1,000 |
| HIDDEN GEMS | $1,000 |
| CONG BETH HILLEL | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.
193 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 187 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- ZCZOCHER CHASDAI OVOS3× · 2021–2023 · $108k · revenue +134% · 34% of their budget
- CCCHICAGO CHESED FUND6× · 2019–2025 · $37k · revenue +83%
- JOJust One Chesed Inc4× · 2020–2023 · $9k · revenue +487%
Funded once
- DGDONATIONS GIVEN TO INDIVIDUALS UNDER 100000one grant, 2021 · $44k
- AAATERES AYALA INCone grant, 2021 · $36k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $18k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support of religious schools in Israel
Religious School
Provide support to further jewish education
Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.
How this is measured
98 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 98 of the 562 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Aj & Sl Stern Family Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Todd a and Raphaela Stern Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Ojc Fund · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · The Dennis Berman Family Foundation Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Ahavas Avraham Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Bitton Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bitton Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc: 28% of income from government
- Mesivta Keren Orah: 10% of income from government
- Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
- Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Bitton Family’s filings →