Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bishop Fund Fd No 2

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$75k
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Arts & Culture$278kEducation$111kScience & Tech$41kEnvironment$35kCivil Rights$10kHealth$5kRecreation & Sports$4kFood & Nutrition$118Other$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k29 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,200
Median grant
4
States reached
$878k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDEPENDENT CURATORS INTL$15,000
BANG ON A CAN$9,000
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$8,000
COPPER CANYON PRESS$6,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$4,000
JACK STRAW CULTURAL CENTER$3,000
EARLY MUSIC GUILD$2,000
CENTRUM FOUNDATION$2,000
SPACE CITY$2,000
SEATTLE PEACE CHORUS$2,000
SEATTLE JAZZED$2,000
NORTHWEST FOLKLIFE$2,000
MUSEUM OF MODERN ART$1,500
BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC$1,500
WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART$1,200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 53% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $8k → 14%SPACE CITY: $2k → 16%THIRD WAY: $10k → 14%EXTINCTION REBELLION AMERICA: $5k → 12%TAFT SCHOOL: $16k → 9%NORTHWEST ARCHITECTURAL LEAGUE: $10k → 9%COPPER CANYON PRESS: $6k → 11%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $8k → 14%BANG ON A CAN: $9k → 20%SPACE CITY: $2k → 16%TAFT SCHOOL: $11k → 9%JACK STRAW CULTURAL CENTER: $4k → 9%COPPER CANYON PRESS: $6k → 11%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $8k → 14%BANG ON A CAN: $9k → 20%TAFT SCHOOL: $11k → 9%JACK STRAW CULTURAL CENTER: $4k → 9%COPPER CANYON PRESS: $6k → 11%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $8k → 14%BANG ON A CAN: $9k → 20%TAFT SCHOOL: $11k → 9%SPACE CITY: $2k → 9%COPPER CANYON PRESS: $6k → 11%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $8k → 14%BANG ON A CAN: $9k → 20%SPACE CITY: $2k → 9%COPPER CANYON PRESS: $6k → 11%CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE: $15k → 14%MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $3k → 17%BANG ON A CAN: $9k → 20%FREE WAY PARK ASSOCIATION: $2k → 9%CENTRUM FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE: $10k → 14%SPACE CITY: $2k → 9%CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE: $10k → 14%SEATTLE PEACE CHORUS: $2k → 9%INDEPENDENT CURATORS INTL: $15k → 17%INDEPENDENT CURATORS INTL: $15k → 17%INDEPENDENT CURATORS INTL: $15k → 17%INDEPENDENT CURATORS INTL: $15k → 17%INDEPENDENT CURATORS INTL: $15k → 17%ALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION: $5k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $4k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $4k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $4k → 9%JACK STRAW CULTURAL CENTER: $5k → 9%JACK STRAW CULTURAL CENTER: $4k → 9%JACK STRAW CULTURAL CENTER: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OR
OH
CT
CA
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$464k · 31 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
10

Total granted

$464k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+17%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INDEPENDENT CURATORS INTERNATIONAL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $75k · revenue +65%
  • TT
    THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $49k · revenue +106%
  • BO
    BANG ON A CAN
    5× · 2020–2024 · $45k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • TW
    THIRD WAY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +17%
  • NA
    Northwest Architectural League
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • AA
    ALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seattle Chamber Music Festival

Seattle Chamber Music Festival fosters the appreciation of chamber music in our region by presenting performances featuring world-class musicians in accessible and inviting formats, with an emphasis on developing a broad-based sustainable…

Arts & Culture
2
California Institute of Contemporary Art
3
Southwest Washington Center for the Arts
Philanthropy
4
Tacoma Art Museum

Tacoma Art Museum transforms our communities by sharing art that inspires broader perspectives and cultivates a compassionate future

Arts & Culture
5
Seattle Symphony Orchestra Inc

To present symphonic music of the highest quality in a distinctive way for the cultural enrichment, education, engagement and enjoyment of the people of our community.

Arts & Culture
6
Artist Trust

Artist Trust supports the livelihoods of artists working in all disciplines to create a more vibrant and equitable Washington State.

Arts & Culture
7
Pacific Northwest Music Project
Arts & Culture
8
Center for Contemporary Art & Culture

To enliven and expand the understanding of craft and the museum experience for all.

Arts & Culture
9
Seattle Artists

Musical and other cultural performances and music education for youth

10
Ripple Productions

With a commitment to new and innovative storytelling, Ripple Productions seeks to push the boundaries of collaboration by integrating the performing, visual, and culinary arts.

Arts & Culture
11
Emerald City Music

Emerald City Music refreshes the chamber music experience by creating a platform of excellence where artists and audience transform one another. Our core pillars are: 1.Audience: We believe that everyone has the right and capacity to…

Arts & Culture
12
Willapa Bay AiR
Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of Modern Art and the most unlike its peers is Port Townsend Meditation CENTERCamas Meditation Hall. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%3%<5yr15%7%5–10yr21%10%10–20yr21%23%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr10%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%2%<5yr15%2%5–10yr21%8%10–20yr21%18%20–35yr13%47%35–55yr10%23%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/31
the rest of the field
12%
5,670/49,172

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
22/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INDEPENDENT CURATORS INTERNATIONAL — $75,000 · Arts & CultureINDEPENDENT CURATORS INTERNATIONALBANG ON A CAN — $45,000 · Arts & CultureBANG ON A CANCOPPER CANYON PRESS — $30,000 · Arts & CultureCOPPER CANYON PRESSThe Early Music Guild of Seattle — $10,000 · Arts & CultureNorthwest Architectural League — $10,000 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern Art — $9,000 · Arts & Culture+12 more — $47,300 · Arts & Culture+12 moreClaremont McKenna College — $35,000 · OtherClaremont McKenna CollegeJACK STRAW CULTURAL CENTER — $20,000 · OtherJACK STRAW CULTURAL CENTERUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONBROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC — $7,500 · OtherBROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INCKEXP — $7,000 · OtherSPACE CITY — $6,000 · OtherSEATTLE PEACE CHORUS — $6,000 · OtherNIAUSI — $5,500 · OtherALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION — $5,000 · OtherEXTINCTION REBELLION AMERICA — $5,000 · OtherSOLOMON GUGGENHEIM MUSEUM — $5,000 · OtherON THE BOARDS — $5,000 · Other+6 more — $11,118 · Other+6 moreTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION — $49,000 · EducationTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPO…CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $40,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE …PORT TOWNSEND MEDITATION CENTERCamas Meditation Hall — $4,000 · Education+2 more — $3,000 · Education350ORG — $30,000 · EnvironmentTHIRD WAY — $10,000 · Civil Rights
Arts & Culture$226,300Other$138,118Education$96,000Environment$30,000Civil Rights$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINDEPENDENT CURATORS INTERNATIONAL — $75,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION — $49,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBANG ON A CAN — $45,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetClaremont McKenna College — $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOPPER CANYON PRESS — $30,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budget350ORG — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Early Music Guild of Seattle — $10,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHIRD WAY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC — $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSpectrum Dance Theater — $7,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHWEST FOLKLIFE — $7,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE PEACE CHORUS — $6,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetSEATTLE ARCHITECTURAL FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $5,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVelocity Dance Center — $5,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetON THE BOARDS — $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSouth Hudson Music Project — $4,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetPORT TOWNSEND MEDITATION CENTERCamas Meditation Hall — $4,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC — $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNew Museum of Contemporary Art — $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle JazzED — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRUM FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BUSH SCHOOL — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSO PERCUSSION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN RAIL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INDEPENDENT CURATORS INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION
  • Who funds BANG ON A CAN
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
  • Who funds Claremont McKenna College
  • Who funds COPPER CANYON PRESS
  • Who funds 350ORG
  • Who funds The Early Music Guild of Seattle
  • Who funds THIRD WAY
  • Who funds Northwest Architectural League
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art
  • Who funds BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC
  • Who funds Spectrum Dance Theater
  • Who funds NORTHWEST FOLKLIFE
  • Who funds SEATTLE PEACE CHORUS
  • Who funds SEATTLE ARCHITECTURAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART
  • Who funds KUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO
  • Who funds Velocity Dance Center
  • Who funds ON THE BOARDS
  • Who funds South Hudson Music Project
  • Who funds PORT TOWNSEND MEDITATION CENTERCamas Meditation Hall
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds New Museum of Contemporary Art
  • Who funds Seattle JazzED
  • Who funds CENTRUM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE BUSH SCHOOL
  • Who funds SO PERCUSSION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

ArtsfundWA23.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Artsfund · Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Raynier Institute & Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Tides Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bishop Fund Fd No 2 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph