Skip to content

· Private foundation

Binstein Family Helping Hand Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$49kRecreation & Sports$20kYouth Development$6kEducation$3kReligion$2kHousing & Shelter$525Philanthropy$500Food & Nutrition$430Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$518
Median grant
3
States reached
$25k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADVOCATE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$9,500
GLENBROOK SOUTH HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI$2,000
QTEGO$1,550
NSSRA FOUNDATION$1,000
LA RABIDA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$555
YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK$518
Individual grant recipient$425
NEDSRA SPECIAL RECREATION ASSOCIATION$325
GLENVIEW PARK DISTRICT$200
LGS FOUNDATION$104
EMWQ WIDOWS & CHILDREN'S FUND$100
CHILREN'S NEUROBLASTOMA CANCER FOUNDATION$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $50 → 14%CHICAGO HELP INITIATIVE: $100 → 14%YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $518 → 14%YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $500 → 14%YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $500 → 14%YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $400 → 14%YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $200 → 14%YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CT
CA
MO
TN
SC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$97k · 20 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +98% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
32

Total granted

$97k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+22%

Still filing today

35%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NSSRA FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $5k · revenue +213%
  • LR
    La Rabida Children's Hospital
    7× · 2018–2025 · $4k · revenue +41%
  • OT
    OFF THE STREET CLUB
    5× · 2017–2023 · $4k · revenue +161%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $900
  • Z
    ZBT
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • NM
    NIGHT MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2018 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Ann & robert h. lurie children's hospital of chicago is dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a…

Health
3
Dana-Farber Children's Hospital Cancer Care Inc

To oversee, coordinate and support the Pediatric Oncology Programs at Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc.

Health
4
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
5
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
6
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
Children's Research Institute

Children's research institute dba children's national research institute conducts and promotes translational and clinical medical research and education programs that lead to improved understanding, prevention, treatment, and care of…

Health
9
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
10
The National Fragile X Foundation

The national fragile x foundation serves the entire fragile x community to live their best lives by providing the knowledge, resources, and tools until, and even after, more effective treatments and a cure are achieved.

Health
11
Pediatric Faculty Foundation Inc

We value excellence and innovation in clinical and basic research, coordinated and comprehensive patient care, ongoing physician education, and evidence-based child advocacy. our goal is to provide leadership in endeavors that promote the…

Health
12
Child Neurology Society

The child neurology society is an inclusive professional organization whose mission is to promote the optimal care of children with neurological and developmental disorders by providing education, advocacy, and support for clinicians and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Shore Senior Center; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADVOCATE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $53,050 · OtherADVOCATE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALGLENBROOK SOUTH HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI: $13,000 · OtherGLENBROOK SOUTH HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNIQTEGO: $4,854 · OtherQTEGONEDSRA SPECIAL RECREATION ASSOCIATION: $3,670 · OtherBACK 2 SCHOOL: $3,230 · Other+33 more: $6,720 · Other+33 moreLa Rabida Children's Hospital: $4,370 · HealthLGS Foundation Inc: $207 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $200 · Health+6 more: $343 · HealthNSSRA FOUNDATION: $4,850 · Recreation & SportsOFF THE STREET CLUB: $4,150 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $2,218 · Human ServicesTHE CHICAGO HELP INITIATIVE: $100 · Human Services+1 more: $50 · Human ServicesTHREE CROWNS FOUNDATION: $400 · Community ImprovementLITTLE BY LITTLE INC: $300 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $54 · International
Other$84,524Health$5,120Recreation & Sports$4,850Youth Development$4,150Human Services$2,368Community Improvement$400International$354

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNSSRA FOUNDATION: $4,850 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetLa Rabida Children's Hospital: $4,370 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOFF THE STREET CLUB: $4,150 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $2,218 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE CROWNS FOUNDATION: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE BY LITTLE INC: $300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY: $230 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLGS Foundation Inc: $207 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetErikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression: $130 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA LAKE COUNTY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHT PINK NFP: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO HELP INITIATIVE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEUROFIBROMATOSIS MIDWEST: $53 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLogan Community Resources Inc: $51 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NSSRA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds La Rabida Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds OFF THE STREET CLUB ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK ↗
  • Who funds THREE CROWNS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE BY LITTLE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds LGS Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND ↗
  • Who funds Erikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression ↗
  • Who funds CASA LAKE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT PINK NFP ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO HELP INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds NEUROFIBROMATOSIS MIDWEST ↗
  • Who funds Logan Community Resources Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL20.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · AbbVie Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · First Bank Chicago Foundation · Baxter International Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Binstein Family Helping Hand Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Binstein Family Helping Hand Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Binstein Family Helping Hand’s filings →

More from the funding graph