Skip to content

Connecticut · Private foundation

Bimah Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$607k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
15
Grants FY2024
12
Organizations funded FY2023
25%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$36,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$112,000
Organizations funded a year
8 to 19
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
7
Total assets, FY2024
$14M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 25% of the organizations Bimah Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 20% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
InternationalArts & CultureRecreation & SportsReligionPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving14$599k29%
FY202312$706k25%
FY202213$508k8%
FY202119$517k32%
FY202014$555k64%
FY20199$391k11%
FY20188$313k13%
FY201711$412kn/a
99% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$2.0MHuman Services$883kReligion$476kFood & Nutrition$366kRecreation & Sports$289kPhilanthropy$238kEducation$115kCivil Rights$51kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
CO
DC
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 29 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($282k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Bimah Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 2 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 25 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBelev Echad Inc: $557,400 over 8y, 25% of budgetThe Lawfare Project Inc: $473,000 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $471,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Friends of Leket Israel Inc: $366,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetThe Blue Card Inc: $326,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetIsrael Emergency Alliance: $293,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetNorthwestern University: $284,394 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOpendor Media Inc: $142,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetBirthright Israel Foundation: $140,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGlobal Jewish Assistance & Relief Network: $100,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetFriends of the Israel Defense Forces: $85,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Institute for National Security of America: $65,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetClarion Project Inc: $51,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetThe Israel Project: $40,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJewish Leadership Academy Inc: $36,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFuente Latina Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetJoyce Theater Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWaldorf School Association of Boulder Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Friends of Jewish Statesmanship Center Inc: $22,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetThe Good People Fund Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAmerica's Voices in Israel: $18,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetSlingshot Fund Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAmerican Friends of the Israel Sport Center for the Disabled: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Horticultural Society: $4,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetContina Impact: $3,391 over 1y, 0.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 25.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY19.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Goodman Family Supporting Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Bimah Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bimah Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bimah Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Bimah Foundation

How much does Bimah Foundation give?
Bimah Foundation reported 15 grants totaling $606,500 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 19 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Bimah Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are International (45%), Human Services (20%), Religion (11%).
Who are Bimah Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Belev Echad Inc ($557k), The Lawfare Project Inc ($473k), Central Fund of Israel ($471k).
Does Bimah Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 25% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Bimah Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Bimah Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Communal Fund, Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles.
Where is Bimah Foundation based?
Bimah Foundation is based in CT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bimah’s filings →

More from the funding graph