Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bill & Marian Cook Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$420k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.6MEducation$2.5MPublic Benefit$1.4MHuman Services$255kEnvironment$238kRecreation & Sports$230kFood & Nutrition$190kArts & Culture$150kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
$40,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Goldwater Institute$150,000
Greater Missoula Family$75,000
Drexel University$75,000
St Patrick Hospital Foundation$40,000
The V Foundation$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Baylor College$25,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LYMELIGHT FOUNDATION: $35k → 7%LYMELIGHT FOUNDATION: $35k → 7%LYMELIGHT FDN: $30k → 7%LYMELIGHT FDN: $25k → 7%LYMELIGHT FDN: $25k → 7%Limelight Foundation: $25k → 7%Greater Missoula Family: $75k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
MI
NV
PA
CT
CA
UT
VA
MD
AZ
NM
NC
HI
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Bill & Marian Cook Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Bill & Marian Cook Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.1M · 33 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
29

Total granted

$7.1M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+40%

Still filing today

58%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH
    7× · 2017–2024 · $960k · revenue +97%
  • MS
    Montana State University Foundation Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $550k · revenue +315%
  • EC
    EYE CORPS INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $417k · revenue +100% · 78% of their budget

Funded once

  • NA
    NO AZ UNIV FDN
    one grant, 2017 · $230k
  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $205k · revenue +57%
  • GF
    Goldwater Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $150k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Roseman University of Health Sciences

Roseman university of health sciences advances the health and wellness of the communities we serve by educating current and future generations of health professionals, conducting research and providing patient care. we actively pursue…

Education
5
Loma Linda University

Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…

Education
6
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
7
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
8
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
12
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yellowstone Boys and Girls Ranch Foundat; the most unlike its peers is Holistic Manangement International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
23/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $536,859 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASU: $439,000 · OtherASUFOCUS ON LYME-LEADERSHIP CHILDRENS: $387,000 · OtherFOCUS ON LYME-LEADERSHIP CHILDRENSALZHEIMERS DISEASE ASSOCIATION: $300,000 · OtherALZHEIMERS DISEASE ASSOCIATIONUNIV OF MISSOULA FDN: $265,000 · OtherUNIV OF MISSOULA FDNNO AZ UNIV FDN: $230,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $225,000 · OtherAMERICAN AUTOIMMUNE RELATED DISEASE: $195,000 · Other+35 more: $2,069,161 · Other+35 moreMontana State University Foundation Inc: $550,000 · EducationMontana State Univers…HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $355,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $345,000 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITYTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $205,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF…GREATHEARTS ARIZONA: $150,000 · EducationGREATHEARTS ARIZONADUKE UNIVERSITY: $106,770 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY+2 more: $39,500 · EducationEYE CORPS INC: $417,000 · HealthEYE CORPS INCTHE V FOUNDATION: $245,000 · HealthTHE V FOUNDAT…ROC SOLID FOUNDATION INC: $180,000 · HealthROC SOLID FOU…ST PATRICK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $160,585 · HealthST PATRICK HO…CAMELOT THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC: $45,000 · Health+1 more: $20,000 · HealthBARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $960,000 · Public BenefitBARRY GOLDW…LymeLight Foundation: $175,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH HOMES: $80,000 · Human ServicesGREATER MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA: $75,000 · Human ServicesYELLOWSTONE BOYS AND GIRLS RANCH FOUNDAT: $60,000 · Human ServicesFOCUS ON LYME FOUNDATION: $118,500 · Arts & CultureCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureBARRY & PEGGY GOLDWATER FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA STORMWATER QUALITY ASSOCIATIO: $75,000 · EnvironmentRange Conservation Foundation: $70,000 · Environment
Other$4,647,020Education$1,751,270Health$1,067,585Public Benefit$960,000Human Services$390,000Arts & Culture$148,500Environment$145,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $960,000 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetMontana State University Foundation Inc: $550,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetEYE CORPS INC: $417,000 over 6y, 78% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $355,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $345,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $245,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $205,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROC SOLID FOUNDATION INC: $180,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetLymeLight Foundation: $175,000 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetST PATRICK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $160,585 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetGREATHEARTS ARIZONA: $150,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFOCUS ON LYME FOUNDATION: $118,500 over 2y, 59% of budgetPRODUCERS PARTNERSHIP INC: $110,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $106,770 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLISTIC MANANGEMENT INTERNATIONAL: $85,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetYOUTH HOMES: $80,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA STORMWATER QUALITY ASSOCIATIO: $75,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetGREATER MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA: $75,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRange Conservation Foundation: $70,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetYELLOWSTONE BOYS AND GIRLS RANCH FOUNDAT: $60,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCAMELOT THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC: $45,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetLYMEDISEASEORG: $41,661 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetCHILDRENS ONCOLOGY CAMP FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY KIDS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBARRY & PEGGY GOLDWATER FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetSWIM WITH MIKE FOUNDATION: $14,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds Montana State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds EYE CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds ROC SOLID FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LymeLight Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ST PATRICK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATHEARTS ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds FOCUS ON LYME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRODUCERS PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HOLISTIC MANANGEMENT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH HOMES ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STORMWATER QUALITY ASSOCIATIO ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds Range Conservation Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE BOYS AND GIRLS RANCH FOUNDAT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Town Pump Charitable FoundationMT15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Town Pump Charitable Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Gianforte Family Charitable Trust · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Arizona Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bill & Marian Cook Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bill & Marian Cook Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bill & Marian Cook Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bill & Marian Cook Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bill & Marian Cook’s filings →

    More from the funding graph