Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bill and Dianne Mensch Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$236kScience & Tech$29kHealth$9kArts & Culture$4kInternational$2kAnimals$1kReligion$300Civil Rights$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$180
Median grant
3
States reached
$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STRAY CAT BLUES RESCUE$1,010
XAVIER COLLEGE PREPARATORY$1,000
PENNRIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT$1,000
ASU FOUNDATION$1,000
FRIENDS OF EIGHT ARIZONA PBS$180
FRIENDS OF PUBLIC RADIO ARIZONA$180
Individual grant recipient$130
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION$110
NCC$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%ST JOSEPH' FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MD
AZ
TN
SC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$239k · 16 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
14

Total granted

$239k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+16%

Still filing today

56%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +93%
  • University of Arizona Foundation
    3× · 2020–2022 · $13k · revenue +54%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FNDTN
    one grant, 2017 · $28k
  • IF
    IEEE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • CH
    COMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +93%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
American Society of Civil Engineers Inc

To provide essential value to our members, their careers, our partners, and the public, asce will: facilitate the advancement of technology; encourage and provide the tools for lifelong learning; promote professionalism and the profession;…

Science & Tech
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
5
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
7
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
8
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
9
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
10
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
11
Sigma Xi the Scientific Research Honor Society Inc

To enhance the health of the research enterprise, foster integrity in science and engineering and promote the public's understanding of science for the purpose of improving the human condition.

—
12
American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Computer History Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UofA FOUNDATION: $161,000 · OtherUofA FOUNDATIONTHE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FNDTN: $27,560 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FNDTNXAVIER COLLEGE PREPARATORY ROMAN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL PHOENIX: $9,000 · OtherPENNRIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $9,000 · Other+10 more: $9,383 · OtherARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $26,464 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVER…University of Arizona Foundation: $13,460 · EducationUniversity of Arizon…IEEE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationIEEE FOUNDATION INC+4 more: $885 · EducationST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF PUBLIC RADIO ARIZONA: $1,310 · Arts & CultureCOMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM: $1,200 · Arts & CultureDURANGO ARTS CENTER INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER: $200 · Arts & CulturePARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,400 · HealthPLEDGE THE PINK FOUNDATION: $203 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $100 · Health+1 more: $50 · HealthFRIENDS OF SHIRATI: $600 · Philanthropy
Other$215,943Education$50,809Human Services$8,000Arts & Culture$3,710Health$1,853Philanthropy$600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $26,464 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $13,460 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIEEE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF PUBLIC RADIO ARIZONA: $1,310 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDURANGO ARTS CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF SHIRATI: $600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $510 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLEDGE THE PINK FOUNDATION: $203 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDurango Education Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds IEEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PUBLIC RADIO ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds COMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds DURANGO ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SHIRATI ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLEDGE THE PINK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds THE TAU BETA PI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Durango Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds CaringBridge ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bill and Dianne Mensch Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bill and Dianne Mensch Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bill and Dianne Mensch’s filings →

More from the funding graph