· Public charity
Biking for Babies
BIKING FOR BABIES proclaims the dignity of human life by uniting cycling with the formation of young adults into missionary disciples of jesus christ
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $75,516 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $450,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $374,484 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $37k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INNERVISIONS HEALTHCARE | $12,404 |
| AGAPE PREGNANCY CENTER | $12,404 |
| MARTHAS HOUSE | $12,404 |
| RUTH HARBOR | $7,564 |
| HOPE PREGNANCY CENTER | $6,148 |
| A BABYS BREATH | $6,148 |
| GENESIS WOMENS CLINIC | $6,148 |
| AMNION PREGNANCY CARE MEDICAL CENTE | $6,148 |
| CHESTER COUNTY CONNECT CARE | $6,148 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
22 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- THTHE HUMAN CHOICE OF IOWA5× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +39%
- APAGAPE PREGNANCY CENTER4× · 2021–2025 · $38k · revenue +42%
- CCCHESTER COUNTY CONNECT CARE4× · 2022–2025 · $28k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- MIMARY'S INN MATERNITY HOMEone grant, 2019 · $7k
- CPCOPE PREGNANCY CENTERone grant, 2019 · $7k
- TJTHE JOHN PAUL II LIFE CENTERone grant, 2019 · $7k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.
Crisis pregnancy counseling.
The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…
To provide support for pregnant women
Consulting for pregnant women. community service referrals.
The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.
Free pregnancy medical clinic with the purpose of helping families through education, medical services, peer counseling, and material support to be fully educated and equipped to carry to term and/or parent if they so choose.
To provide support to unplanned pregnancies.
To provide abortion alternatives, to educate clients, and provide alternative counsel.
Pregnancy information, guidance and assistance
To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pregnancy Aid Clinic Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mary's Shelter Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE HUMAN CHOICE OF IOWA ↗
- Who funds AGAPE PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHESTER COUNTY CONNECT CARE ↗
- Who funds RUTH HARBOR ↗
- Who funds GENESIS WOMEN'S CLINIC ↗
- Who funds A Babys Breath ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY AID CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST OPTIONS FOR WOMEN ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN PAUL II LIFE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Mary's Shelter Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Biking for Babies funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Biking for Babies?
Find your warmest path to Biking for Babies through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.