Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bihun Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$91kArts & Culture$36kEducation$29kHuman Services$18kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,674
Median grant
3
States reached
$422k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION IN SC$8,102
MUSC FOUNDATION$5,349
ROPER ST FRANCIS FOUNDATION$5,349
MAKE-A-WISH$5,020
CHARLESTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$2,674
EAST COOPER MEALS ON WHEELS$2,674
HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE$2,674
DEE NORTON CENTER$2,524
MOUNT PLEASANT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $3k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $3k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $2k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$204k · 14 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
0

Total granted

$204k
$0

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RS
    Roper St Francis Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $29k · revenue +224%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SC INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $22k · revenue +49%
  • CS
    CHARLESTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +63%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    6/7
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    MUSC FOUNDATION: $29,485 · OtherMUSC FOUNDATIONAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION IN SC: $20,362 · OtherAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION IN SCDEE NORTON CENTER: $17,503 · OtherDEE NORTON CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMOUNT PLEASANT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $12,000 · OtherMOUNT PLEASANT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $8,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+1 more: $2,000 · OtherRoper St Francis Foundation: $29,251 · HealthRoper St Francis FoundationMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SC INC: $21,510 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SC INCBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $7,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC+1 more: $1,500 · HealthCHARLESTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $15,396 · Arts & CultureEAST COOPER MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $14,524 · Food & NutritionHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $9,303 · Human Services
    Other$105,850Health$59,261Arts & Culture$15,396Food & Nutrition$14,524Human Services$9,303

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRoper St Francis Foundation: $29,251 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SC INC: $21,510 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCHARLESTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $15,396 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEAST COOPER MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $14,524 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $9,303 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds Roper St Francis Foundation ↗
    • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SC INC ↗
    • Who funds CHARLESTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
    • Who funds EAST COOPER MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
    • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC ↗
    • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
    • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Publix Super Markets Charities IncFL13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Bihun Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bihun Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Bihun Family’s filings →

      More from the funding graph