Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bignon Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$157k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Animals$238kRecreation & Sports$188kEducation$130kHealth$101kInternational$85kHuman Services$63kReligion$43kYouth Development$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $135k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$453k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$25,000
PAWMETTO LIFELINE INC$25,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$15,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS$10,000
GARNET TRUST FOUNDATION$10,000
RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFFS FOUNDATION$10,000
NFB OF SC COLUMBIA CHAPTER$5,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF THE MIDLANDS$5,000
USO$5,000
PALMETTO FOUNDATION FOR PREVENTION & RECOVERY$5,000
SC ACADEMY OF SCIENCE$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FISHER HOUSE OF COLUMBIA: $5k → 16%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE MIDLANDS: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of Bignon Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 72% of the giving stays in SC; by stated purpose, 70%.

Bignon Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$981k · 20 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
13

Total granted

$981k
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+3%

Still filing today

60%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PL
    PAWMETTO LIFELINE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $263k · revenue +9%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $148k · revenue +87%
  • University of South Carolina Educational Foundation
    5× · 2021–2025 · $125k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA ATHLETICS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • TB
    TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • RB
    ROCKY BOTTOM CAMP OF THE BLIND
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Carolina Ems Foundation
—
2
Servants for Sight

Servants For Sight's mission is to help disadvantaged people, in South Carolina and in third world countries, get the eye care they need to lead productive lives. We provide eye exams, eyeglasses and surgery to poverty stricken and…

Health
3
South Carolina Pharmacy Foundation

Promote pharmaceutical service

Education
4
South Carolina State Firefighters' Foundation

The foundation exists to support sc firefighters and their families. support includes scholarships, need-based assistance, emotional support, grants to support non-government funded fire suppression needs, and public education.

Education
5
Southern Palmetto Foundation

The Southern Palmetto Foundation works to drive positive economic Impact foster regional talent and improve overall quality of life throughout the CSRA with a focus on Barnwell and Allendale Counties.

Community Improvement
6
The Palmetto Trust for Historic Preservation Inc

To protect and preserve buildings of architectural and historial significance in South Carolina.

Arts & Culture
7
Veterans Trust Fund of South Carolina

Serve needs of south carolina veterans

Public Benefit
8
South Carolina Tennis Association Inc

To develop, maintain, and promote the game of tennis.

—
9
South Carolina Public Interest Foundation
Crime & Legal
10
Scbio Foundation

By focusing on the mission to enhance the development and growth of south carolina's life sciences industry ecosystem and by strengthening the state's workforce, education, innovation, and research infracstructure, the foundation works to…

Science & Tech
11
Catholic Foundation of South Georgia Inc

To provide effective stewardship of philanthropic assets entrusted to its care by donors who desire to advance the religious, charitable, and educational works of the catholic diocese of savannah and its schools, parishes, and agencies.

—
12
South Carolina Future Farmers of America Foundation

Promote & support students in agriculture in SC.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Works Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHRINERS HOSPITALS: $50,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITALSTHE SALVATION ARMY: $37,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYALPHA TAU OMEGA FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · OtherALPHA TAU OMEGA FOUNDATION INCRICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · OtherRICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S FOUND…SHARING GODS LOVE INC: $20,000 · OtherSHARING GODS LOVE INCIndividual grant recipient: $17,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientROCKY BOTTOM RETREAT & CONFERENCE CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $15,000 · OtherUSO: $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA ATHLETICS: $10,000 · OtherTRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $10,000 · Other+14 more: $67,600 · Other+14 morePAWMETTO LIFELINE: $262,500 · AnimalsPAWMETTO LIFELINEFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $148,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF C…University of South Carolina Educational Foundation: $125,000 · EducationUniversity of…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $100,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'…Palmetto Foundation for Prevention and Recovery: $25,000 · HealthWELVISTA: $23,500 · HealthLIVING WATER FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · HealthCALHOUN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthGARNET TRUST FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Philanthropy
Other$297,600Animals$262,500Youth Development$148,000Education$130,000Religion$100,000Health$73,500Philanthropy$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPAWMETTO LIFELINE: $262,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $148,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $100,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGARNET TRUST FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetALPHA TAU OMEGA FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPalmetto Foundation for Prevention and Recovery: $25,000 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetWELVISTA: $23,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetLIVING WATER FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALHOUN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetROCKY BOTTOM CAMP OF THE BLIND: $5,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetGOOD WORKS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSaluda Shoals Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PAWMETTO LIFELINE ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds University of South Carolina Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds GARNET TRUST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA TAU OMEGA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Palmetto Foundation for Prevention and Recovery ↗
  • Who funds WELVISTA ↗
  • Who funds RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING WATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CALHOUN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY BOTTOM CAMP OF THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds GOOD WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Saluda Shoals Foundation ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Fisher House of Columbia Sc Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF THE MIDLANDS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Carolina Community FoundationSC25.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Carolina Community Foundation · Michael J Mungo Foundation · Kw Beverage Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bignon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bignon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bignon Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph