· Public charity
Biglife International Inc
BIGLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $5,142,278 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,637,137 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $494,859 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $47k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $405k
- $250k+2 grants · $4.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION | $2,690,000 |
| THE SIGNATRY | $2,000,000 |
| KINGDOM LEADERSHIP NETWORK | $125,000 |
| PRIORITY LIVING SERVANT CATALYST | $107,850 |
| L1A | $72,500 |
| CRU | $50,000 |
| CORNERSTONE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL | $50,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL COVERED MINISTRIES | $29,834 |
| M4 NETWORK | $17,094 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +8% since the first grant, against -25% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NWNEW WATER MINISTRIES4× · 2019–2022 · $192k · revenue +72%
- VIVILLAGEWORX INC4× · 2019–2022 · $107k · revenue +520% · 34% of their budget
- TFTHE FELLOWSHIP OF AILBE3× · 2019–2022 · $30k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- SISERV INTERNATIONAL INCone grant, 2022 · $240k · revenue -15%
AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETYone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue -25%- FCFLORIDA CARIBBEAN BAPTIST CONFERENCEone grant, 2023 · $123k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades
Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ
Missionary support ministry to pastors and missionaries in Africa and India. We encouraging and uplifting them with spiritual and devotional teachings of Jesus using the internet. Partners in winning souls for the Kingdom of God.
Supporing missionaries worldwide
Our mission is proclaiming the message of salvation through the saving power of the Holy Spirit to reach the unreached by evangelizing; motivating, mobilizing and organizing the body of Christ.
Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…
Religious
Religious- Sharing the Gospel and the love of Christ with others.
Provide oversight spititual support, evangelize the word help the poor and needy including aid in the translation of the nible
Religious
Our mission is to carry out the commands of our Lord Jesus Christ to take the Good News of the gospel to the whole world teaching people to obey everything He commanded. We work among mostly low-literacy populations so we do this by…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Serv International Inc and the most unlike its peers is 2414. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Servant Foundation ↗
- Who funds NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SERV INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds NEW WATER MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds 1 Body Ministries ↗
- Who funds KINGDOM LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds VILLAGEWORX INC ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds THE FELLOWSHIP OF AILBE ↗
- Who funds SHARE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds 2414 ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Biglife International Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.