Skip to content

· Private foundation

Big Joy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$622k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

International$649kEducation$333kReligion$283kArts & Culture$100kYouth Development$33kPhilanthropy$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $225k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $397k
$39,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$7.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DENVER FILM SOCIETY$100,000
SERVENOW$90,725
SERVLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC$56,450
NDOTO$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
NDOTO$50,000
INTERNATIONAL DEAF EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$42,000
BIG D VISION ORPHANS$39,000
SERVENOW$32,276
MOSAIC INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES$29,500
STEP INTERNATIONAL INC$25,000
SERVENOW$19,500
KIDZ AT HEART INTERNATIONAL$15,500
KIMS OPEN DOOR INC$12,500
EDIFY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $264k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STEP INTERNATIONAL INC: $25k → 15%STEP INTERNATIONAL INC: $10k → 15%SERVENOW: $91k → 9%SERVENOW: $32k → 9%SERVENOW: $20k → 9%SERVENOW: $86k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IN
OH
CA
CO
MO
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Big Joy Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 46% of the giving stays in CO; by stated purpose, 25%.

Big Joy Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 42% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$751k · 6 repeat orgs$682k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$751k
$299k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+6%

Still filing today

67%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $383k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SERVLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $229k · revenue +10%
  • S
    SERVENOW
    2× · 2022–2025 · $229k · revenue +21%
  • KA
    KIDZ AT HEART INTERNATIONAL
    2× · 2023–2025 · $34k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • WV
    WORLD VISION - NORTHERN ZAMBIA WASH
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • WR
    WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS
    one grant, 2024 · $66k · revenue +6%
  • I
    IDEA
    one grant, 2024 · $49k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
2
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
3
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
4
Partners in Development Worldwide

Train ministers, lay people and students who are involved at any level of ministry in small or large churches at local, national, and international levels. We train to go into the world and spread the gospel by helping people meet their…

International
5
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
6
Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International
7
Network Beyond

Network Beyond is a Christian organization serving vulnerable and under-resourced people. We focus on three areas: 1. Leadership development - equipping global leaders with biblically based training. 2. Compassion and justice - support for…

Crime & Legal
8
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
9
International Service Fellowship

Interserve USA recruits, trains, sends, and supports Christian professionals from America who live and work long term, generally among the poor, in places which need their expertise; especially in medicine, development, education, English…

—
10
Partnership for Indigenous Peoples -Pipes - International

We are a global Christian organization committed to partnering with indigenous peoples, local churches, and community-based organizations to make disciples of Jesus Christ and help end extreme poverty. We serve indigenous pygmies,…

International
11
Disciple Maker Ministries

Disciple Maker Ministries is devoted to fulfilling the Great Commission through evangelism and reproducing discipleship.

Religion
12
Empowering Lives International

Empowering Lives International (ELI) ignites world changers. We equip families and orphans to crush poverty, embrace Christ, and share their transformation with others through their God-honoring income, their deepening relationship with…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Edify; the most unlike its peers is Denver Film Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SERVLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $229,068 · OtherSERVLIFE INTERNATIONAL INCSERVE NOW - TEACH HOUSING LAGUTU SC: $194,200 · OtherSERVE NOW - TEACH HOUSING LAGUTU SCWORLD VISION - NORTHERN ZAMBIA WASH: $100,000 · OtherWORLD VISION - NORTHERN ZAMBIA WASHIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIDEA: $48,500 · OtherIDEAInternational Deaf Education Association: $42,000 · OtherBIG D VISION ORPHANS: $39,000 · OtherLUTHERAN HOUR MINISTRIES: $30,000 · Other+5 more: $84,590 · Other+5 moreSERVENOW: $228,751 · Human ServicesSERVENOWSTEP INTERNATIONAL: $35,060 · Human ServicesSTEP INTERNATIONALWORLD VISION INC: $100,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION…WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $65,558 · InternationalWORLD RELIEF…Edify: $10,000 · InternationalEdifyNDOTO: $100,000 · EducationDENVER FILM SOCIETY: $100,000 · Arts & CultureKIDZ AT HEART INTERNATIONAL: $34,000 · ReligionMOSAIC INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $29,500 · ReligionKIM'S OPEN DOOR INC: $12,500 · Youth Development
Other$817,358Human Services$263,811International$175,558Education$100,000Arts & Culture$100,000Religion$63,500Youth Development$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSERVLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $229,068 over 3y, 15% of budgetSERVENOW: $228,751 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNDOTO: $100,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetDENVER FILM SOCIETY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $65,558 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Deaf Education Association: $42,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetSTEP INTERNATIONAL: $35,060 over 2y, 14% of budgetKIDZ AT HEART INTERNATIONAL: $34,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetMOSAIC INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $29,500 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetKIM'S OPEN DOOR INC: $12,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SERVLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVENOW ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds NDOTO ↗
  • Who funds DENVER FILM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
  • Who funds International Deaf Education Association ↗
  • Who funds STEP INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds KIDZ AT HEART INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MOSAIC INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds KIM'S OPEN DOOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Edify ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Big Joy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Big Joy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Big Joy Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Big Joy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Big Joy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph