Skip to content
Bethesda Hospital Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Bethesda Hospital Inc

To improve the health status of the people we serve.

$471k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$238k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.5MCommunity Improvement$1.0MHuman Services$446kCrime & Legal$232kPhilanthropy$196kFood & Nutrition$172kEducation$141kHousing & Shelter$94kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $401,089, the rows itemized in this filing. The $470,653 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $69,564 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $138k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $238k
$16,625
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER$237,500
HEALTHY MOMS & BABES INC$47,842
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$28,500
CINCINNATI ARTS ASSOCIATION$19,000
CINCINNATI ZOO AND BOTANICAL GARDENS$16,625
CANCERFREE KIDS$14,250
FREESTORE FOODBANK$11,875
CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER$9,500
FRIAR'S CLUB INC$9,500
PEOPLE WORKING COOPERATIVELY INC$6,497
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $31k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $17k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $8k → 14%EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT HOMES INC: $5k → 16%SWEET CHEEKS DIAPER BANK: $20k → 16%SWEET CHEEKS DIAPER BANK: $8k → 16%OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $13k → 16%OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $10k → 16%OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $10k → 16%OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 27 repeat orgs$358k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
20

Total granted

$3.7M
$346k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+17%

Still filing today

96%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UPTOWN CONSORTIUM INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $959k · revenue +135%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2021–2025 · $599k · revenue +27%
  • HM
    Healthy Moms & Babes Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $387k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $109k · revenue +106%
  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION OF CINCINNATI INC
    one grant, 2018 · $40k · revenue -10%
  • BF
    BETHESDA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $39k · revenue -29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
2
Columbus Community Clinical Oncology Program

Our mission is to deliver state-of-the-art cancer care to patients in their communities through clinical trials. this allows individuals to remain in their won neighborhoods, while receiving the latest and best in cancer screenings,…

—
3
Columbus Medical Association Foundation

The columbus medical association foundation, through the governance and oversight of its board of physicians and other experts, effects change within specific priority areas to improve the health and wellbeing of the residents and…

Health
4
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
5
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber

To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.

—
6
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
7
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
8
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
9
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
10
Mount Carmel Health System

We, mount carmel health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mount carmel health system is a member of trinity health.

—
11
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber Foundation

To develop and promote economic development, talent initiatives and the unique offerings in the cincinnati region.

Community Improvement
12
Catholic Charities Corporation

Respond to those in need through an integrated system of quality services designed to respect the dignity of every person and build a just and compassionate society.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Healthy Beginnings Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/45
Grantees still filing
29/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $599,100 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTERHealthy Moms & Babes Inc: $387,217 · HealthHealthy Moms & Babes IncAmerican Heart Association Inc: $263,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncCENTER FOR CLOSING THE HEALTH GAP IN GREATER CINCINNATI: $198,000 · HealthCENTER FOR CLOSING THE HEALTH GAP IN GREATER CINC…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $77,998 · HealthCENTER FOR RESPITE CARE INC: $69,778 · Health+9 more: $209,185 · Health+9 moreUPTOWN CONSORTIUM INC: $959,259 · Community ImprovementUPTOWN CONSORTIUM INCLegal Aid Society of Cincinnati: $231,628 · OtherLegal Aid Society o…GOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCE: $109,004 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN COLL…Friars Club Inc: $77,062 · OtherFriars Club IncHEALTHY BEGINNINGS INC: $69,400 · OtherHEALTHY BEGINNINGS …United Service Organizations of Central and Southern Ohio Inc: $25,500 · OtherZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI: $47,523 · OtherZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY …+16 more: $163,252 · Other+16 moreUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati: $186,031 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $51,120 · PhilanthropyCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC: $19,800 · PhilanthropyCINCINNATI BLUE LINE FOUNDATION: $9,932 · PhilanthropyFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $150,622 · Food & NutritionAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $55,191 · Human ServicesCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY - GREATER CINCINNATI/NORTHERN KENTUCKY: $43,019 · Human ServicesCOVERD GREATER CINCINNATI: $27,948 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL RETIREMENT HOMES INC: $5,112 · Human ServicesCINCINNATI ARTS ASSOCIATION: $47,560 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER: $18,328 · Arts & Culture
Health$1,804,778Community Improvement$959,259Other$723,369Philanthropy$266,883Food & Nutrition$150,622Human Services$131,270Arts & Culture$65,888

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUPTOWN CONSORTIUM INC: $959,259 over 6y, 7.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $599,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHealthy Moms & Babes Inc: $387,217 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $263,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLegal Aid Society of Cincinnati: $231,628 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCENTER FOR CLOSING THE HEALTH GAP IN GREATER CINCINNATI: $198,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati: $186,031 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $150,622 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCE: $109,004 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $77,998 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFriars Club Inc: $77,062 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetCENTER FOR RESPITE CARE INC: $69,778 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetHEALTHY BEGINNINGS INC: $69,400 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $55,191 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $51,120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI ARTS ASSOCIATION: $47,560 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI: $47,523 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY - GREATER CINCINNATI/NORTHERN KENTUCKY: $43,019 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION OF CINCINNATI INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBETHESDA FOUNDATION INC: $39,298 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $30,186 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOVERD GREATER CINCINNATI: $27,948 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetThe Karen Wellington Memorial Foundation: $26,780 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCancerFree KIDS: $26,185 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUnited Service Organizations of Central and Southern Ohio Inc: $25,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE MATT HAVERKAMP FOUNDATION: $23,755 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC: $19,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER: $18,328 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $16,382 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE WORKING COOPERATIVELY INC: $14,443 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEaster Seals Tristate: $14,235 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO CANCER RESEARCH ASSOCIATES: $12,462 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMARVIN LEWIS COMMUNITY FUND: $12,415 over 1y, 58% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $11,935 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORWINE FOUNDATION INC: $11,875 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNAMI OF SOUTHWEST OHIO: $10,224 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCINCINNATI BLUE LINE FOUNDATION: $9,932 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $7,668 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTENDER MERCIES INC: $5,112 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFound House-Interfaith Housing Network: $5,112 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEPISCOPAL RETIREMENT HOMES INC: $5,112 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $5,112 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $5,060 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Trihealth IncThe Good Samaritan Ho…The Greater Cincinnat…Johnson Charitable Gi…United Way of Greater…Carol Ann and Ralph V…L & L Nippert Charita…Farmer Family Foundat…John a Schroth Family…Spaulding FoundationThe Scripps Howard Fo…Duke Energy Foundation
Trihealth IncOH64.5× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Trihealth Inc · The Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati Ohio · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · L & L Nippert Charitable Foundation Inc Attn Carter F Randolph Phd · Farmer Family Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Spaulding Foundation · The Scripps Howard Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bethesda Hospital Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bethesda Hospital Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bethesda Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home