Skip to content
Beta Theta Pi Fraternity Group Return at a glance

· Public charity

Beta Theta Pi Fraternity Group Return

Beta theta pi fraternity is formed for the purpose of the promotion of the relations between students of various colleges and universities; and the perpetuation of a fraternity that recognizes mutual assistance in the honorable labors and aspirations of life; unsullied friendship, unfaltering fidelity and the cultivation of intellect, as…

$320k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$88k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$146kEducation$71kFood & Nutrition$17kCrime & Legal$16kYouth Development$12kPhilanthropy$12kRecreation & Sports$7kInternational$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $142,494, the rows itemized in this filing. The $320,049 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $177,555 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $88k
$11,631
Median grant
5
States reached
$9.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE RAPE RECOVERY CENTER$87,910
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$23,084
ABUELOS FOUNDATION$11,631
TEXAS 4000 FOR CANCER$11,000
BETA THETA PI FOUNDATION$8,869
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 45% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%THE MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION: $7k → 11%PERKINS ELEMENTARY: $17k → 11%WOODS HUMANE SOCIETY: $6k → 12%THOMAS MILOSCIA FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $5k → 17%DISABLED OUTDOORSMEN USA: $7k → 7%TEXAS 4000 FOR CANCER: $11k → 10%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TH BRAZOS VALLEY: $6k → 22%BEST BUDDIES INTERNATIONAL: $6k → 15%THE RAPE RECOVERY CENTER: $88k → 8%BETA THETA PI FOUNDATION: $9k → 12%FEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA: $17k → 8%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE NRV: $16k → 21%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $23k → 8%PERKINS K-8 SCHOOL: $15k → 11%THOMAS MILOSCIA FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%FUNDING BRIGHT FUTURES: $9k → 17%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BRAZOS VALLEY: $6k → 22%ABUELOS FOUNDATION: $12k → 15%NAMI - ROANOKE VALLEY: $12k → 8%PERKINS K-8 SCHOOL: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
CA
UT
VA
MD
AZ
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

16%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$48k · 3 repeat orgs$246k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
10

Total granted

$48k
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-10%
+5%

Still filing today

67%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $142k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationCrime & LegalPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PK
    PERKINS K-8 SCHOOL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $21k
  • TT
    THE THOMAS MATTHEW MILOSCIA FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue -10% · 58% of their budget
  • BC
    Boys Club of Brazos County Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $12k · revenue -17%

Funded once

  • SD
    SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY SERVICE ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $17k · revenue -9%
  • FS
    FEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2024 · $17k · revenue -5%
  • CT
    CHILDREN'S TRUST FOUNDATION ROANOKE VALLEY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $16k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
2
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
3
Cystic Fibrosis Research Institute

To fund cystic fibrosis research, provide educational and personal support, and to spread awareness of cystic fibrosis, a life-threatening genetic disease.

Health
4
The Curetivity Foundation

Provide monetary or financial aid exclusively for charitable, religious, scientific, literary or educational purposes and to solicit, receive, maintain and disburse funds for these purposes and for the betterment of children.

Health
5
Childrens Oncology Services Inc

Camp one step by children's oncology services is a leader in providing empowering, supportive, educational, and fun experiences for children (ages birth-19) who have been diagnosed with cancer and their families. we are the only local…

Health
6
Connecticut Cancer Foundation Inc

To provide funds to benefit families affected by cancer and to support cancer research and education.

—
7
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health
8
CureCervicalCancer

Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.

International
9
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
10
Children's Foundation of America

Children's foundation of america (the foundation) is a not-for-profit organization established to raise funds and provide support to children in need. the primary goal of the foundation is to identify and access resources to support foster…

Education
11
Children's Trust of South Carolina

To strengthen families, organizations, and communities to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Human Services
12
CancerFree Kids

CancerFree KIDS exists to raise awareness of the need for more funding for pediatric cancer research and to raise funds that are invested in early stage, potentially game-changing research focused on gentler treatments and cures for…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
5/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RAPE RECOVERY CENTER: $87,910 · HealthRAPE RECOVERY CENTERCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $23,084 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATIONTEXAS 4000 FOR CANCER: $11,000 · HealthTEXAS 4000 FOR CANCERCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $5,127 · HealthPERKINS K-8 SCHOOL: $21,000 · OtherPERKINS K-8 SCHOOLSAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY SERVICE ASSOCIATION: $17,245 · OtherSAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COM…NAMI ROANOKE VALLEY: $12,021 · OtherNAMI ROANOKE VALLEYABUELOS FOUNDATION: $11,631 · OtherABUELOS FOUNDATIONFUNDING BRIGHT FUTURES: $8,643 · OtherFUNDING BRIGHT FUTURESMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $7,243 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICADISABLED OUTDOORSMEN USA INC: $7,000 · OtherDISABLED OUTDOORSMEN USA INCBest Buddies International Inc: $6,307 · OtherBest Buddies International IncWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $6,200 · OtherWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INCFEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA: $17,000 · Food & NutritionCHILDREN'S TRUST FOUNDATION ROANOKE VALLEY INC: $16,389 · Crime & LegalTHE THOMAS MATTHEW MILOSCIA FOUNDATION INC: $15,152 · PhilanthropyBoys Club of Brazos County Inc: $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentBETA THETA PI FOUNDATION: $8,869 · Education
Health$127,121Other$97,290Food & Nutrition$17,000Crime & Legal$16,389Philanthropy$15,152Youth Development$12,000Education$8,869

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAPE RECOVERY CENTER: $87,910 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetSAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY SERVICE ASSOCIATION: $17,245 over 1y, 18% of budgetFEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA: $17,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S TRUST FOUNDATION ROANOKE VALLEY INC: $16,389 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE THOMAS MATTHEW MILOSCIA FOUNDATION INC: $15,152 over 2y, 58% of budgetBoys Club of Brazos County Inc: $12,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTEXAS 4000 FOR CANCER: $11,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBETA THETA PI FOUNDATION: $8,869 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $7,243 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISABLED OUTDOORSMEN USA INC: $7,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $6,307 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $6,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $5,127 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodThe Blackbaud Giving …Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Network for GoodDC9.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beta Theta Pi Fraternity Group Return funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beta Theta Pi Fraternity Group Return. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Beta Theta Pi Fraternity Group Return’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home