· Public charity
Beta Theta Pi Fraternity Group Return
Beta theta pi fraternity is formed for the purpose of the promotion of the relations between students of various colleges and universities; and the perpetuation of a fraternity that recognizes mutual assistance in the honorable labors and aspirations of life; unsullied friendship, unfaltering fidelity and the cultivation of intellect, as…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $142,494 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $320,049 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $177,555 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $46k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $88k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE RAPE RECOVERY CENTER | $87,910 |
| CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION | $23,084 |
| ABUELOS FOUNDATION | $11,631 |
| TEXAS 4000 FOR CANCER | $11,000 |
| BETA THETA PI FOUNDATION | $8,869 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 45% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $142k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PKPERKINS K-8 SCHOOL2× · 2023–2024 · $21k
- TTTHE THOMAS MATTHEW MILOSCIA FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue -10% · 58% of their budget
- BCBoys Club of Brazos County Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $12k · revenue -17%
Funded once
- SDSAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY SERVICE ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2022 · $17k · revenue -9%
- FSFEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIAone grant, 2024 · $17k · revenue -5%
- CTCHILDREN'S TRUST FOUNDATION ROANOKE VALLEY INCone grant, 2023 · $16k · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…
The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.
To fund cystic fibrosis research, provide educational and personal support, and to spread awareness of cystic fibrosis, a life-threatening genetic disease.
Provide monetary or financial aid exclusively for charitable, religious, scientific, literary or educational purposes and to solicit, receive, maintain and disburse funds for these purposes and for the betterment of children.
Camp one step by children's oncology services is a leader in providing empowering, supportive, educational, and fun experiences for children (ages birth-19) who have been diagnosed with cancer and their families. we are the only local…
To provide funds to benefit families affected by cancer and to support cancer research and education.
Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.
Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.
To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.
Children's foundation of america (the foundation) is a not-for-profit organization established to raise funds and provide support to children in need. the primary goal of the foundation is to identify and access resources to support foster…
To strengthen families, organizations, and communities to prevent child abuse and neglect.
CancerFree KIDS exists to raise awareness of the need for more funding for pediatric cancer research and to raise funds that are invested in early stage, potentially game-changing research focused on gentler treatments and cures for…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RAPE RECOVERY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY SERVICE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S TRUST FOUNDATION ROANOKE VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds THE THOMAS MATTHEW MILOSCIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Boys Club of Brazos County Inc ↗
- Who funds TEXAS 4000 FOR CANCER ↗
- Who funds BETA THETA PI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds DISABLED OUTDOORSMEN USA INC ↗
- Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
- Who funds WOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Network for Good · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Beta Theta Pi Fraternity Group Return funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.